‘Within You Without You’ was composed on a harmonium following a dinner party at the London home of Klaus Voorman, the German artist and musician whom The Beatles first met in Hamburg. Written by George Harrison, it was the only non Lennon–McCartney song on the Sgt Pepper album.
The song was Harrison’s second full-blown Indian recording, after Revolver’s ‘Love You To’. Although regarded by some as a dull interlude in the otherwise masterful Sgt Pepper, ‘Within You Without You’ encapsulated the exploration of spiritual themes that had become popular in 1967’s Summer of Love.
Clear references to the counterculture (‘Are you one of them?’) and the LSD-related ego death (‘And to see you’re really only very small and life flows on within you and without you’) can be found amid the more other-worldly exploration of spiritual philosophy and religious teachings.
The laughter at the end of the track was Harrison’s idea. While some listeners initially thought it was the sound of the other Beatles mocking his songwriting effort, it was in fact meant to lighten the mood after five minutes of sad, almost mournful, music.
‘Within You Without You’ came about after I had spent a bit of time in India and fallen under the spell of the country and its music. I had brought back a lot of instruments. It was written at Klaus Voormann’s house in Hampstead after dinner one night. The song came to me when I was playing a pedal harmonium.I’d also spent a lot of time with Ravi Shankar, trying to figure out how to sit and hold the sitar, and how to play it. ‘Within You Without You’ was a song that I wrote based upon a piece of music of Ravi’s that he’d recorded for All-India Radio. It was a very long piece – maybe 30 or 40 minutes – and was written in different parts, with a progression in each. I wrote a mini version of it, using sounds similar to those I’d discovered in his piece. I recorded in three segments and spliced them together later.
The Anthology 2 album, released in 1996, featured an instrumental version of ‘Within You Without You’ slowed down to its original key and speed. The song also featured on the 2006 remix album Love, in which it was blended to the rhythm track of ‘Tomorrow Never Knows’.
One of George’s best songs. One of my favourites of his, too. He’s clear on that song. His mind and his music are clear. There is his innate talent; he brought that sound together.
All We Are Saying, David Sheff
In the studio
George Harrison was the only Beatle present during the recording of ‘Within You Without You’. He and Neil Aspinall played tamburas while Indian musicians performed traditional instruments.
Recording began on 15 March 1967. Initially it had the working title Untitled, and on the first day just one take of the basic track was taped. Although Harrison claimed that the song was recorded in three parts and later edited together, it was in fact taped as one, initially lasting six minutes and 25 seconds.
The Indian musicians were recruited from the Asian Music Circle in Finchley, north London. They were Anna Joshi and Amrit Gajjar on dilruba, Buddhadev Kansara on tamboura, and tabla player Amiya Dasgupta. Another two dilruba parts were overdubbed on 22 March.
On 3 April – the final day of recording for Sgt Pepper, apart from the album’s run-out groove gibberish taped on 21 April – George Martin conducted eight violinists and three cellists playing a score written to Harrison’s suggestions.
That evening Harrison also recorded his lead vocals, a sitar part and some acoustic guitar, and ‘Within You Without You’ was complete. The final mixes of the three parts were edited together on 4 April 1967.
Just great
The song is a big turnoff. Can’t believe we had to listen to that. Try dancing to it or humming it at work. Not a song I want to listen to as I drive in my car.
It isn’t for those sorts of things. It is for listening to relax (at least how I listen to it) it really is a great song to put on the Sgt Pepper album, probably one of the best.
Its my 2nd favorite song of all time
Oh please. You know, since the ’60s, there have also been people who thought of LSD as a party drug. It is not that. It’s for introspection and contemplation. Some music is like that too.
Wha? You’re not serious are you? This is one of the best in the Beatles’ entire repertoire. That and, another George song, Something. I listen to it in my car all the time. Keeps me mellow during the commute.
“One of George’s best songs. One of my favourites of his, too. He’s clear on that song. His mind and his music are clear. There is his innate talent; he brought that sound together.” —
John Lennon
I’ve been humming/singing/speaking this song at work for the last four days, which is amazing, considering I first heard it almost 50 years ago. A couple of incidents of late virtually excavated it from my memory.
You have a great opportunity to seek the meaning of life in that song. Don’t miss it.
Absolutely, couldn’t agree more.
You have got to be kidding! This song just proves how talented, and genius and diverse ALL the Beatles were. They were so outstanding that they couldn’t be confined in a box. Why do you think it was such a tragedy to their fans when they split up? Then add to that the tragic, early death/murder of John Lennon and the early passing of George Harrison. We have been robbed of fantastic music they were sure to make. Thankfully we still have Paul and Ringo who keep touring and keep the Beatles alive. I feel privileged to have lived during their too short career. I hope your appreciation of the Beatles music matures because your missing out if it doesn’t.
Not seeing the big picture. Sign and song for its times. I like it personally. Good tune. Masterful lyrics.
One of my absolute favorites. It wasn’t made to dance to. It is introspective. When I was a teenager and heard this for the first time it was almost like a religious experience. I remember thinking, “WHAAAAT!! What IS this?” 50 years ago it was jaw dropping. There really hand’t been anything like it mass produced commercially. But that song changed my whole way of thinking after I’d listened to it several times. It was then that I stopped following the negative, unyielding, organized religion of the deep south and started to think there was more out there. The object was not to fear but to love. It set me on a whole new path which upset the apple cart but I didn’t care. I was in it for me and not what others thought. The sound was so familiar to my soul. It took me years but I figured out it was the drone music that struck a chord in me – pun intended. But the lyrics made me think. I’ve played it thousands of times over the years but decades after it came out I heard it on a very high end sound system with fantastic speakers and it blew me away AGAIN. It set the tone for the 60’s that’s for sure. Everybody had that album and listened to it constantly that summer. If you weren’t talking about it then you were considered a nerd.
I strongly disagree. It’s one of the most beautiful pieces of music in the world and one of the most original compositions by a band famous for original compositions.
That’s debatable. It’s similar to what Ravi Shankar had been doing, and on top of that it’s basically an overlong retread of George’s “Love You To” (from the “Revolver” LP). I actually put the needle on “When I’m Sixty-Four” when playing the Sgt. Pepper LP, just to avoid listening to it.
Your criticism is short sighted.
It’s a beautiful example of George Harrison getting a piece of himself into an already McCartney/Lennon dominated band. He expressed his feeling a separation as well as a oneness with those around him in a way which we rarely get to hear. The only other example would be ‘While my guitar gently weeps’ and I’m perfectly comfortable with the fact that this was a positive song while the other is not quite in the same vain.
Stunningly beautiful
I was born in 1968 as the Fab Four were winding down! But this is the music that I grew up with in the 70’s! First through radio play, then moving on to buying their albums. Although I had heard this song before, I hadn’t really appreciated it for what it was: a masterpiece, until I tried LSD for the first time and had an out of body experience while listening to this fantastic song! Over the years I have grown to appreciate George’s Indian inspired tunes, and I am ashamed to admit that I have never listened to Wonderwall! But now that I have revisited Beatle music for the umpteenth time, I think I will purchase it through Amazon but I think I will disburse with the mind-altering substances as I am in my 50’s now and I am more of a tea-totaler these days!
Arguably George’s first great song.
Prior to Sgt. Pepper I thought his songs were up and coming along quite nicely especially on Revolver. Apparently Only A Northern Song almost made it to Sgt. Pepper.
In one breath George wrote a spiritual song and in another breath he writes a secular song where he is cheesed off.
Ah duality!
Totally agree. George came up with a real gem here, and thank God, because if they had to put Only a Northern Song on Pepper,It would have detracted from the feel of the album. The dilruba introduces the song wonderfully, and carries it beautifully to it’s end. Although some critics argue that WYWY doesn’t really fit on pepper, I strongly disagree. You leave the circus atmosphere of Mr. Kite and your carpet ride brings you eastward through India before depositing you into a 1920s caberet club for When I’m 64.
A wonderful trip.
Well said George! Whether it be on a magic carpet ride or a Magical Mystery Tour or even a Magic Bus, Sgt. Pepper does bring you on a journey and to have left this song off would have been a tragedy!
In my book his first GREAT song is “Think For Yourself”
Fascinating song. Georges’s “out of this world” voice and lyrics, as well as the Indian instruments and Oriental resonances invite to daydream and abandon.
(If there must be a “dull interlude” in the incredible Sgt Pepper, well, than it’s When I’m 64–although I really love the song. It’s just different from the other songs.)
Within You Without you is one of the defining pieces of Sgt Pepper.
Yes, defining as in the most skipped song of all time on any album
You can lead a horse to water…
Here George captures Eastern spirituality and mysticism masterfully on a record. This is a song that brought a new world of color to The Beatles’ repertoire. It’s not just a defining song for Sgt. Pepper, it’s a defining song for The Beatles. I would argue that those who skip this track or cite it as a “dull interlude” are people who do not understand music very well, and have not opened themselves or their mind to their music.
You either like it or you don’t. Both are valid and allowed, despite the thought-police who seem so pervasive here.
Personally, I agree with Nick. While I won’t call it unbearable or unlistenable, I will say I skip it with regularity.
This is definitely my favourite Beatle song. The lyrics are so deep and true, and the music is so hypnotic yet soothing. This is the song that made Sgt Peppers, and the only song that seperates me from Sgt Peppers and Revolver. This song made me love The Beatles, and made George Harrison my favourite Beatle. Nothing can be in league of these lyrics.
George should have had more spiritual conversations with Klaus Voorman, which was the circumstance that inspired this song.
I believe this song and Day In The Life are the two main reasons that Pepper deserves its reputation.
When I first heard Pepper in the spring of 1967, these two songs struck me as the pillars of the album.
They still resonate.
While I can’t disagree with you:
1 the acid of Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds
2 the suburban melodrama of She’s Leaving Home (with those glorious second vocals) &
3 the brooding menace of Being For The Benefit Of Mr. Kite
all add to the album’s unique overall effect.
Very good addition to my comment.
These five songs we’ve mentioned together, plus Good Morning, Good Morning, are the main Pepper songs for me.
She’s Leaving Home is a throwaway, along with Getting Better.
Yeah, this song is horribly underrated. The writing is just unbelievable, and there is no better LSD song in my opinion. Very beautiful and true. I’d like to hear any argument against this song.
Except maybe “Across The Universe”
I apologize, my first reply came out of order and is intended for the comment that nothing can be in a league with these lyrics. For the record, I don’t see “Across The Universe as an LSD song, and Love Within You Without You.
I don’t understand these problems with George’s writing. I think several Harrison songs surpass McCartney/Lennon in lyricism, and Within You Without You is just beautiful. It is one of the most soothing, if not the most soothing Beatles song ever created. Give me the man a little more credit.
Absolutely fantastic. If it werent for the fact that Sgt. Pepper obviously had to be the opening track on.. well, Sgt. Pepper, I would have liked for this to be the opening track. It would have made a nice transition between Revolver and Sgt. Pepper when listening to them back to back, as I so often do 😉 It’s so smooth, it’s like listening to silk in musical form 🙂
It was the first track on side two, however, which in the days of vinyl was like the opening of act 2.
Actually, being 1st on Side 2 was great for those unfortunate enough to want to skip over this song.
I used to hate this but now I’m older I know better. george was way ahead of his time when he wrote this or probably back to a better time.
Does george actually play the sitar on this? He struggles with the guitar until 1969 but picks up the sitar so quickly. It just does not make sense that he would be so compentent at the sitar so fast.
George struggling? See the Ed Sullivan Show Performance of Till There Was You.
Great point, Kelvin. And remember he was only 20 years old on that historic first show. What pressure for such a young guy and he nails it – perfectly!
George “struggling ” with the guitar ? You’re bananas !
I just have to ask where this “struggling” thing came from? I’ll always point people to watch his live “Til There Was You” solo on ed Sullivan.
I have no proof, but I’m pretty sure he didn’t learn that from YouTube.
Definetely George’s best and most famous work with the sitar, and my favorite song off of Sgt. Pepper’s. I understand George was rather uninterested with the majority of the album and this song is his amazing contribution to it… not to say his guitar/sitar/tampura work throughout the rest of the album isn’t also important.
I must ask, aren’t there two harp lines in this song just before the tabla comes in, as well as after the instrumental bridge and just before George begins singing again? Or is that just creative use of the sitar?
That’s either a regular harp or an Indian ‘swarmandal’. And it may or may not have echo, but I don’t think it’s two separate lines. (But I’m relying on memory here – I’ll have to give a proper listen later on!)
Count me as another one who found this to be a singular track within the context of Pepper’s; I definitely agree that this is right near the top of George’s catalog, if not at the top.
I always thought Lucy was facile and somewhat insipid, nothing more than an attempt to be deliberately ‘out there’…Within You is, as someone above mentioned, the *real* exploration of the confluence of late sixties drug experimentation and spirituality.
Also…for all you fans of this track…I highly recommend you check out the Easy Star All-Stars “Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Dub Band”. The album is a track-for-track re-creation (*not* a re-mix, an actual re-creation) of Pepper’s, featuring a number of reggae and dub artists.
The version of Within You, Without You is pretty stellar…the vocalist is Matisyahu, who’s main schtick is a whole reggae/hebrew spiritualism crossover (sounds strange, I know). Anyway, he absolutely nails this track; it’s by far the best of the re-creations on the album (2nd best is Kirsty Rock on ‘She’s Leaving Home’). His treatment of the song is pretty inspiring.
As with (actually) many Beatles songs, this one is one I have never appreciated until I started to pick up musical instruments myself. I’ve never played a sitar, but I’ve been playing guitar lately and you gain large respect for those who are talented on musical (especially stringed) instruments.
This song is haunting and I believe that is entirely do to George’s philosophical lyrics and the Indian backing track.
i think i found a part in the stereo version of within you, without you that your can hear George count back in the song. I cant hear it on the mono mix, but im sure its there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljnv3KGtcyI
Listen at 3:44
When George wrote “and to see you’re really only very small” refers to how the Vedic literatures refers to the soul or atma as being the size of one ten thousandth the tip of a hair in size. It is a statement meant to humble us, to give up our false pride that we think that we are so “big”, deluded by false pride. The teachings that George delved into are not “Hindi” as mentioned above. The Vedic literatures were compiled in Sanskrit over 5000 yrs ago, and Hindi is a much later derivative of it. The word Hindu was fabricated by the Muslims who lived north of the Sindhu or Indus River, who referred to those south of that river as “Hindus”. It is inaccurate and sectarian.
I am doing an essay on this song for my English class, & I’m really trying to research and explore the message behind these lyrics. This was tremendous help, thanks!
How this song is positioned on Pepper (Side 2, cut 1) interests me. The opening lyric “we were talking about the space between us all and the people who hide themselves behind a wall of illusion” can plausibly be interpreted as a reference to the songs from Side 1, which deal with themes of isolation and fantasy. It seems to me the songs which follow WYWY deal with more hum-drum, reality-based themes like aging (When I’m 64), meter maids, daily routine (GMGM) and “I read the new today oh boy”. That this songs seems to serve as a natural “bumper” between the two sides of the album may be (a) happy coincidence, (b) very clever positioning by the boys or GM in selecting the order of the cuts, or perhaps someone would like to chime in with another explanation.
Btw, Joe, only recently found your website and really enjoy it. Thanks!
I was one of many people who didn’t think too highly of “Within You, Without You” when the album first came out. It took about 6 months for it to grow on me and, having done so, it remains one of my favourite Beatles’ tracks. The whole album was – and still is – astonishing, and I don’t understand the detractors who want to diss such a groundbreaking work of art.
This song might have been the reason the Beatles broke up- Not because of Yoko.
They must have realized after listening to this masterpiece that they probably only scratched the surface of what they could really do. An entire world must have opened up for them. It was probably at this point that each of them started to think to themselves,
“I don’t need the others to play on my song” and that’s where it probably started to unfold. Regardless, this is an important piece of music and a beautiful one at that.
Billy Boy, I agree with you. Anyone who blamed the breakup of the Beatles on Yoko had not been paying attention.
Besides, when you have that many brilliant musicians in the same room, it’s awfully hard for things to hang together for long. Look at Buffalo Springfield for another example.
It’s amazing the Beatles stayed together as long as they did.
Quote “I believe this song and Day In The Life are the two main reasons that Pepper deserves its reputation.
When I first heard Pepper in the spring of 1967, these two songs struck me as the pillars of the album.
They still resonate.”
Very good point…A stunning piece of work from George Harrison, and still a high point in the use of Indian music in the pop realm, if you can call it pop music.
Perfect opener for side B.
In 1967 listening to Sgt Pepper in our basement for the very first time, our jaws were slack already as we flipped side one over to side two – at this point no idea what to expect. Then the opening sitar notes and tabla sounds – George’s voice – we knew, there was no turning back . . .
A beautiful melding of Eastern and Western instruments. And part of George’s dissatisfaction stemmed from his spiritural awakening and how his music fit into it, as well as his dissatisfaction with his role in the group
I’ve been playing this song for weeks. I love it, although my family has tired of my efforts. I should mention that I play an open back banjo, and with a mute attached. The drone works, it works very well. I can’t imagine that a guitar works as well.
Wow, my take is a little different. This is possibly my least favorite of any Beatles song. Musically it is so tedious as to be mind-numbing. The melody is annoying and never goes anywhere. The song is way too long.
I am fine with Indian music, and the general message of the song. But the words sound like they were copied out of some book or guru. So heavy handed! And I can only think of one element I like of the entire musical arrangement- a little repeating sitar line early in the instrumental break.
And I think George was deservedly treated as the second-tier songwriter in the band. If I remember correctly, all he came up with in the incredibly fertile 1967 was this and Blue Jay Way.
It has always seemed to me that if they took this out of Sgt Pepper and put back in the first two songs recorded for the project- Penny Lane and Strawberry Fields- Sgt Pepper would have truly deserved all the hype still made about it. This song may be nice for musical diversity but in my opinion it really cramped the album.
Don’t you forget about It’s all too much. A fantastic Harrison’s festive song from that period.
Within You departs from everything, standing light years beyond the attempts of his psychedelic contemporaries at grafting the sitar on to western music. George was really expressing himself in this song. For George, the Indian mystical tradition was not a superficial late sixties fad, it resonated with his soul to his dying day and beyond. Within You is such a beautiful song and has made time irrelevant, because it will always sound fresh.
I used to skip this song, but for the last 5-7 years or so, it’s become one of my favorites. I can only imagine listening to this on vinyl for the first time in 1967 and flipping the album over after the crazy circus carnival music of Mr. Kite only to hear the sitar come in to begin side 2.
I have listened to Sgt Pepper’s and to Abbey Road so many times, literally hundreds of times. I think WYWY is a perfect fulcrum where both sides of the album balance. I was 17 when it came out, I am 64 now and it is still so fresh. I cannot listen to one song or two, I have to listen to the whole album every time, I don’t even think of each song separately. This album is a unit.
Only a northern song should be in sgt peppers.it has the same stmosphere as being for the benefit. It s a pitty that George Martin acted like the Beatles boss and decided to cut it out. The song is absolutely part of the package that s why there s only six tracks at the the b side and not seven as most beatles records.
That’s not the reason there are only 6 songs on Sgt Peppers 2nd side.
A Hard Days Night also only has 6 songs on side 2 of the UK album.
The reason there are only 6 songs on side 2 is the running time of the side and the fact that they were not going to give George 2 songs on the album when one of them is 5:05 mins. in length.
Besides George Martin did not think …Northern Song was up to standard.
I actually disagree with George Martin on that point.
I think Only A Northern Song is marvellous.
Great article Joe. I’m never able to hear the laughing at the end, but I think I heard a small giggle towards the end. Otherwise, that was it. Love this song forever?
I don’t have any tattoos but am @ 65 contemplating getting Jai Guru Deva Om or Within You Without You somewhere on my being . As I get older some of the Beatle songs now sometimes elicit a teardrop from my eye . I picked up the guitar a few years ago and playing these quite simple songs is like therapy and rejuvenates me every time . Another stunning effort by George is Be Here Now . My whole body might be covered with Beatle song titles once I get going .
A top 5 Beatles number. Beautiful middle instrumental bridge. Thoughtful, melodic, inspiring, and just a stunning composition.
Please, do not treat “Love” as a part of discograghy. It’s a ill part of work, useful in Las Vegas mayby but not between thinking people. Good bye & good luck, jz
Off topic, but I agree. I got Pandora for the Beatles station but found it to be mostly mash-ups from Love so I dropped it.
Read a review of Pepper written a couple years ago that stated “of all the songs on this album, Within you Without you didn’t stand the test of time, stuck in the hippy dippy past”. Well, yeah, because 64 and Lovely Rita are such timeless masterpieces!! I think it rises like a lotus above what especially clever Paul was fanning his ego with.
Critics of this song obviously haven’t listened to it sitting still with 2 or 300 micrograms of LSD on board.
One of the truest and deepest meanings is expressed in this song making it perhaps the most insightful and crippleware musical expression in all of popular music. Lyrics to like can’t you realize it’s all within yourself no one else can make you change? You can’t get better than that.
I was 13 and a besotted Beatles worshipper when sgt. Pepper was released back in 1967. And I was totally blown away by it, except for this song. I thought: “My, this is so boring! Nothing’s happening…!”
And it wasn’t until many years later I understood that this piece of music was way over my head at that age; the lyrics, the droning tambouras, it just wasn’t really comprehenceable for a 13-year old kid (at least not for me).
It’s more like a state of mind than a song, really, and should be listened to in that way, I believe. In that sense it’s a bit similar to “Tomorrow Never Knows”. It’s an extraordinary piece, and deserves its place on Pepper.
I also find the lyrics quite comforting; the thought of life going on within you and without you..
It’s a privilege being part of Life.
The “unknown musicians” on this recording have since been identified, as detailed in this great write-up. It would be nice to see this entry updated with their names!
“Those musicians are the late Anna Joshi and Amrit Gajjar (dilruba); and Sikh temple musician Buddhadev Kansara (tamboura) and Natwar Soni (tabla)”
Thanks Brendan. I’ve amended the page. I think there’s also a svarmandal player unaccounted for, so I’m happy to add info if it comes to light.
I am a bit mystified by those who regard this song as “soothing.” Not as mystified as I am by people who hate it it, but their minds probably won’t—“No one else can make you change.” The song is hypnotic, yes, but if you pay attention to, and take to heart, what it’s telling you, you should be very unsettled by the message: you’ve got a lot to do; a lot of illusions and delusions to dispel to achieve what the song recommends.
According to Richard Lush Either Paul, John or Ringo sneaked into the studio playing a little bit of tamburin. You can hear it at approximately 3:25, which actually is the very end of the recoding of the Indian instruments.
I can hear a tambourine at the point, so perhaps it was Ringo, given that he was the Beatles’ drummer.
It was George’s choice to recruit Indian musicians to support him on “Within You Without You”.
I find the Anthology take to be superior than the LP version. I think that the mysticism of the song shines better in that instrumental version. So, that’s why i take Love You To and The Inner Light over this as the bests “indian” songs of George.
I can’t hear any Acoustic Guitar in the recording can someone help me find it please.
This deconstructed video shows a segment for isolated dilruba, sitar, acoustic guitar and strings.
This is an extremely melodious song all the more impressive when you realise it is written on only one chord.
I like the arrangement more than I like the song. That’s OK; everyone isn’t going to love everything…or any one thing.
I started playing tabla a while back, partly after rediscovering this song. Going to ask my tabla teaqcher for help transcribing the tabla part. After all these years, this is the one song on the album I can play day after day and still find fresh.
Jenny Boyd, Pattie’s sister, tell the story of finding the sentence “life flows on within you and without you” in the book “Karma and Rebirth” by Christine Humphreys, and being so blown away by it that she called Pattie to talk to her about it. However, George answered the phone and she had the conversation with him. According to Jenny, “As we were all sort of on that sense of a spiritual search, those ideas were sort of spread across the zeitgeist of that time. We would share things. Anything that was an inspiring tidbit, and so it was a natural thing for me to do.”
I wasn’t looking forward to hearing this song again after more than fifty years, but I’m glad I made the effort. It’s very different from how I remembered it. The predominant instruments are the tabla and dilubra, rather than sitar. The recording of the tabla is stunning – a beautiful melding of percussion and bass. And while George Martin’s orchestration could easily have spoiled the song, it complements the Indian instruments perfectly.
This is the psychedelic album the Beatles made. Removing two songs and adding three, this is a complete trip. Within You Without You following Strawberry Fields Forever is amazing.
I know it’s silly to mess with classic album history by rearranging songs but… this is all the psychedelic songs they wrote for this session and it’s fun to play the order of what might have been. I know… it’s 56 years later. Let it go.
Sgt. Pepper
With A little Help from My Friends
Lucy in the sky With Diamonds
Getting better
Fixing a Hole
Being for the benefit of Mr. Kite
Only a Northern Song
Penny Lane
Strawberry Fields Forever
Within You Without you
Lovely Rita
Good Morning
Sgt. Pepper Reprise
A Day in the life
… and She s Leaving Hone and When I m 64 – songs you obviously dislike but which contribute positively to the diversity of the album – would end up in the nirvana … or would they be released as single instead? They were not finished in early 1967.
I never understood the notion that George’s songs were not given proper consideration by John and Paul. I find this song to be unlistenable. I don’t care about the deeper message in the song. It doesn’t make it any better a song. Awaiting On You All has an equally sanctimonious message, but is an absolutely fantastic song. How did this song get on Pepper and Blue Jay Way on Magical Mystery Tour? Seems to me they did him a favor. When he had good songs, they got featured. Taxman. Something. Here Comes the Sun. It was all about the best songs. John songs dominated on A Hard Day’s Night, as well as their originals on Beatles for Sale. On Revolver, and afterwards, Paul dominated. I’m speaking it terms of volume of songs…they both had epic songs throughout. Then, of course, there’s debate on many songs of whether they were co-written, etc. , but it seems to me they didn’t care who wrote the songs. The best songs were ones they recorded.
Anyone who doesn’t love this song just doesn’t “get it”. Are you one of them ?
Well I hate this song, so no I don’t get “it”, whatever that is. Is “it” the message in the lyrics? The words are fine. It would make an excellent poem. But it’s not a poem. It’s a song. I cannot listen to this song. Is there something else I’m missing? Hmm…maybe if I play it backwards…