John Lennon’s most acerbic song on the White Album, ‘Sexy Sadie’ was a barbed tribute to Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, and was written during Lennon’s final hours in India.
That’s about the Maharishi, yes. I copped out and I wouldn’t write ‘Maharishi, what have you done? You made a fool of everyone.’ But now it can be told, Fab Listeners.
Rolling Stone, 1970
Shortly after Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr left India, Lennon’s friend Alexis Mardas, also known as Magic Alex, arrived.
Mardas had previously been known as Lennon’s ‘guru’, and was reportedly alarmed at seeing his influence upon Lennon waning. He is said to have started a rumour that Maharishi had made a sexual advance towards one of the women on the meditation course.
Alexis and a fellow female meditator began to sow the seeds of doubt into very open minds… Alexis’s statements about how the Maharishi had been indiscreet with a certain lady, and what a blackguard he had turned out to be gathered momentum. All, may I say, without a single shred of evidence or justification. It was obvious to me that Alexis wanted out and more than anything he wanted The Beatles out as well.
Mia Farrow has occasionally been identified as the object of the Maharishi’s desires, but McCartney and Harrison both denied this.
It was a big scandal. Maharishi had tried to get off with one of the chicks. I said, ‘Tell me what happened?’ John said, ‘Remember that blonde American girl with the short hair? Like a Mia Farrow lookalike. She was called Pat or something.’ I said, ‘Yeah’. He said, ‘Well, Maharishi made a pass at her.’ So I said, ‘Yes? What’s wrong with that?’ ‘He said, ‘Well, you know, he’s just a bloody old letch just like everybody else. What the f**k, we can’t go following that!’They were scandalised. And I was quite shocked at them; I said, ‘But he never said he was a god. In fact very much the opposite. He said, “Don’t treat me like a god, I’m just a meditation teacher.” There was no deal about you mustn’t touch women, was there? There was no vow of chastity involved.’ So I didn’t think it was enough cause to leave the whole meditation centre.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
Regardless of its veracity, the rumour gave Lennon an excuse to leave India. As he waited to leave, he began writing the song that would become ‘Sexy Sadie’.
That was written just as we were leaving, waiting for our bags to be packed in the taxi that never seemed to come. We thought: ‘They’re deliberately keeping the taxi back so as we can’t escape from this madman’s camp.’ And we had the mad Greek with us who was paranoid as hell. He kept saying, ‘It’s black magic, black magic. They’re gonna keep you here forever.’ I must have got away because I’m here.
Lennon began singing his ode to the Maharishi as he and George Harrison drove to Delhi.
John had a song he had started to write which he was singing: ‘Maharishi, what have you done?’ and I said, ‘You can’t say that, it’s ridiculous.’ I came up with the title of ‘Sexy Sadie’ and John changed ‘Maharishi’ to ‘Sexy Sadie’. John flew back to Yoko in England and I went to Madras and the south of India and spent another few weeks there.
Anthology
The opening lines may have been inspired by Smokey Robinson’s song ‘I’ve Been Good To You’, which begins with the lines: “Look what you’ve done/You made a fool of everyone”. One of Lennon’s favourites, the song was briefly busked by The Beatles during the Get Back/Let It Be sessions in January 1969.
Derek Taylor recalled Lennon scratching the lyrics to ‘Sexy Sadie’ into a piece of wood in the Apple offices. The wood was kept by Maureen Starkey, and was later sold to a Beatles collector.
The Beatles recorded a demo of ‘Sexy Sadie’ at George Harrison’s Esher bungalow in May 1968, along with 22 other contenders for the White Album.
In the studio
Although it was originally titled Maharishi, it was never recorded as that. However, during the first session for ‘Sexy Sadie’, on 19 July 1968, Lennon demonstrated to McCartney how it was originally conceived:
You little t**t
Who the f**k do you think you are?
Who the f**k do you think you are?
Oh, you c**t
Mark Lewisohn
The Beatles spent much of the session jamming and rehearsing ‘Sexy Sadie’, but eventually taped 21 takes of the song. According to Lewisohn, these varied between 5’36” and 8’00”.
Take six from this day – featuring just vocals, electric guitar, drums and organ – was released on 1996’s Anthology 3. Slower than the final version, the distinctive piano part is absent, as is the extended winding finale.
The group began a remake on 24 July, recording 23 takes. None of these were used, however, and on 13 August 1968 they began a third attempt. They recorded eight takes, numbered 100-107, the last of which was the basis for future overdubs.
‘Sexy Sadie’ was completed on 21 August. John Lennon recorded another lead vocal, and organ, bass, tambourine and two sets of backing vocals were added.
Seems to me the piano part on “sexy sadie” sounds distorted. Do ya think they recorded it at one speed & then slowed it down for the vocals to get this sound? George’s “isn’t it a pity” version 2 has even more of this sound to it. Anyone out there to enlighten me?
It sounds like some tape delay echo is used also. I think it could be a combination of that and some varied speed recording. I have always loved that sound.
The piano opening for this song really has a great sound, whether it’s distorted or not.
I heard that distortion the first time I heard the song, it is mystical. It is the basis for this being one of my favorite Beatle’s recordings.
I had read the piano was recorded from a distance. Half-way down a narrow hallway to give it that beautiful echoing, distant sound. I’m sure effects were applied as well. I’m a keyboardist, and this is one of my favorite piano parts in any Beatles song.
Compare Radiohead’s piano part for their song Karma Police on OK Computer to what Paul plays on Sexy Sadie.Beatles influence everyone.
Yeah, we know. It’s a nod and a homage. It isn’t news.
Just adding a bit of info. At 2:55 there’s a cut, around 39 seconds. The song it would last 3:58. In Bootlegs there’s is the complete version.
Again, as happened on Don’t Pass Me By, the song was cut from 3:58 to 3:16.
They cut around 39 seconds of instrumental ending.
The cut is on 2:55 but it’s unoticable.
In several bootlegs of White Album is the complete version.
I used to think this song was just you know pretty good but I have recently ,after 34 years of listening to the white album, suddenly fallen in love with like never before. It is just beautiful. I love the sarcasm of “How did you know, the world was waiting just for you”. I could write more but I won’t.
Personally I think Don’t Pass me by, is one of the worst songs on the album. As far as songs go, Id much rather hear Not Guilty. Sexy Sadie to me is one of the coolest sounding songs, with the combination of the music progression and Lennons vocal melody and even pulling out an old early Beatles sound with the falsetto ooh oohs part. Within a more mature Beatles writing style it was cool for John to bring that back.
I would love to hear some more takes of this…. especially the second day attempts.
Duly noted
I am curious more about how George felt about this song? There is a reference about it in the article and all, but he seemed to be the most involved in the whole India thing. Even if he did get him to change the title, wouldn’t it bother you to play on a song that is mocking a person that you respect so much? Or is changing the title enough for him? Was he also in any way offended/scandalized by the behavior. Was a pass ever really made at anyone? If there had been would that have been any sort of corruption or abuse of power? I know little about that religion, so could be that Paul is right. As long as he was not in any way using his power unethically to meet women wouldn’t he have the right to a consensual interest in someone. Or would it bother John because of how old he was (of course, Paul ended up marrying someone like 25 years younger, than him later in his life)? Or because he is obviously in a position of teacher/master and to take a woman from this is sort of like the same thing as a college instructor using his position to influence students (while they are in the class and prone towards admiration). Any links to this subject in more detail somewhere else on the website forum, or good articles about what exactly did or did not happen in India, and if the leader was an honest and sincere man, or in any way corrupt/abusing power on some level?
I guess this article deals with some of my questions. https://www.beatlesbible.com/features/india/
I suppose I was just curious if history rendered any specific answers as to the integrity of Maharishi and if he actually had acted inappropriately, or i fit was a rumor. Even that last conversation Lennon recalls with him, seems to not be very detailed. Though I guess George was somewhat convinced that something was wrong.
All I can say is I feel blessed I never met John Lennon. As much as I love satire I would hardly say that Maharishi deserved his rath. I imagine that the Beatles used there fame to get woman just as this teacher had. If anyone wants to take issue with Maharishi about something I would say they should slam him for allowing the TM movement to ban Andy Kaufman from one of there retreats. But I don’t think he did anything out of line at that camp in 1968, but seeing as I was less than 2 years old when it happened I wasn’t there.
Hi. You raise good questions. I have just posted a comment. I don’t know where all my research is, but I think the guru was guilty. I did a lot of good research three years ago.
It really depends on whatever the impression that the Maharishi left with all of them about overcoming their desires, and then the Bestles seeing him as a hypocrite, I could see John getting upset. Feeling he was duped by what John would consider a fraud.
Does anyone know exactly when it was revealed that the song was about Maharishi?
I always thought John first revealed it in the 1970 Rolling Stone interview (as quoted above), but I’ve found a 1968 Rolling Stone review of the album where Wenner says “Sexy Sadie is Maharishi”: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/review-the-beatles-white-album-186863/
John and Paul had said some slightly negative things about Maharishi during their Apple launch interviews, but I don’t think they’d said anything about writing a song about him or Mia Farrow etc.
So were Rolling Stone guessing? Might Lennon have told it off-the-record to Rolling Stone when they interviewed him in 1968? Was it a common rumour at the time before John confirmed it?
I love this song. In the final version, the singer’s attitude towards Sexy Sadie doesn’t really seem scathing. It seems more wistful and admiring. And the “you’ll get yours yet” line sounds like the inevitable fate of any superstar after the press turns on her.
This and “I’m So Tired” have the same cool chord change–I to V/III ( Gmaj to F#maj and Amaj to G#maj, respectively). I love it and can’t off the top of my head think of another song built from this change. Can you?
Martha My Dear has the same change right at the beginning of the intro as well as the verse. Eb to D7.
Also the chords in the bridge where the lyrics go ‘Sexy Sadie, she ‘s the greatest of them all” The chords go A7, Ab, G.
The Ab chord ( a combination of piano and guitar )has a dominant 7th at the bottom and a major 7th on top ( technically Ab7-15 chord! ) is a real unique harmony when placed after the A7 and before the G–which subliminally gives this song-if not the entire album–a sound purely of its own.
And this is what I feel actually gave the Beatles the musical power they had. Everything they did sounded like it came from no where else–even when they did a lot of covers earlier in their career.
In order to be complete and correct, it would be also interesting to quote what Yoko One has said to Rolling Stone Magazine in 2008 about this song and the Maharishi : “If Lennon were alive today, says Yoko Ono, he probably would have reconciled with the man he accused of having “made a fool of everyone.” “John would have been the first one now, if he had been there, to recognize and acknowledge what Maharishi has done for the world and appreciate it,” she says”.
I guess, but I’d posit even Ono couldn’t know that for sure.
Lennon spoke about all his Beatles songs to Rolling Stone in 1980, and notably didn’t go back on this one.
The Ono quote was also issued in wake of Mahesh’s death. That is usually the time to make nice about someone. Especially over single incidents 40+ years prior.
So a useful tidbit, and thanks for posting it. But I don’t think it settles anything about the song, at the time, in that moment.
Sexy Mia. Sexy Prudence.
That’s my thinking in the matter. How the Maharishi rationalized everything.
I would have to dig up my research, but three years ago, I read a lot, plus used a lot of reason, and my keen understanding of that era’s culture, as well as that of India.
Of course, I wasn’t there, and please understand that a huge percentage of entertainers’ public statements, are not to be fully believed.
But the entire culture then, was just to have, well, “relations”, with anyone, anytime, for any reason, and people did. I don’t believe in that.
Consider: There is this famous guru. They are all involved in so much 60s thought. If, in fact, he took Mia, Prudence, another girl, or whoever, into the cave or whatever it was, to ostensibly meditate, his rationale was going to be, to do “it” with her, not mediate only.
What the Sam Hill, should they have expected? They should have known this might happen.
I mean, come on. Most religious guru types, or cultists, do this.
Further, as much as John was given to doing the bizarre or unusual, I cannot accept that he would write, and record a song, to chastise, or to get back at someone, unless the facts were true.
Of COURSE, everyone is going to deny it, just as several people who knew John Phillips, steadfastly deny what he did, to his daughter.
Lastly, remember that all the people on that India trip, were into LSD, etc, either then, or in general, and that distorts all realms of reason, decency, and truth.
I believe that when the Beatles went to India it was a matter of NO DRUGS, ALCOHOL, or possibly even Cigs, to free the mind of restricting or controlling vices…so I think their minds were a lot clearer during this period, and remember also, this is when and where they found out about Brian Epsteins death.
Brian died before they went to India. But they were with the Maharishi (in Wales) when they heard of his death.
If I’m So Tired is to be believed there must have been access to cigarettes and alcohol.
I don’t know about alcohol, but there are photos of them in India with ciggies hangout out of their mouths.
“If, in fact, he took Mia, Prudence, another girl, or whoever, into the cave or whatever it was, to ostensibly meditate, his rationale was going to be, to do “it” with her, not mediate only.
What the Sam Hill, should they have expected? They should have known this might happen.”
Wow. Time hasn’t been kind to this comment. OK, it’s been six, seven years, and I’m writing this in 2021.
Let’s just say if you go to a spiritual retreat overseas, having the expectation of going to a spiritual retreat overseas is not out of bounds, and you’re not a fool for expecting it to be a spiritual retreat.
Even in the sixties, there wasn’t an Orgy around every corner. Though it is worth noting, with your IMO inexperienced tug at the nature of LSD, research suggests this was a relatively sober environment, and the thing to me had elements of detox.
So no, you don’t need to give excuses to someone who abused his position. As for if John was right…. Tricky. I see Paul’s “well, he only said he was human too” as fair, but then, there are reasons and they are excuses and “being human” is not a reason for misconduct.
So. Not sure what drove you to say it. But I for one think “the girls should have known what they were getting into” to be an increasingly tired excuse.
this is one of my favorite Beatles songs. One of the most beautiful ones in my opinion.
I just thought:
This doesn’t fit for Maharishi. I suppose John was projecting his own Image onto Maharishi.
The song makes completely sense, if he’s singing about himself and the attractive image he created with the beatles. Maybe he wasn’t aware himself.
Love this John Lennon song. Lennon at his “acerbic”best as Joe said. In later years he would write “How Do You Sleep?” and “Steel and Glass” in the same vein.George Harrison and Paul McCartney disagreed with his view of events regarding the Maharishi. But whatever the truth this song is another great song off the “White Album”.
after a long time of listening to this song, i tend to hear a problem with the speed of the tape machine at 0.19sec and more obvious at 1.19min. every time i ask myself if i m crazy.can somebody have an opinion about that.
Well that makes two of us.
Actually, I found this post while searching for some confirmation for the weird transition I always hear. Glad to know I’m not alone.
The further you get away from the original inspiration, the more you can play with this viciously funny song. One could now apply it to Hillary Clinton or Lady Gaga or Melania Trump or even Donald T! Clever Johnnie!
Nicky Hopkins played piano on this song. Why does everyone get it wrong??????
Source? I’ve read he plays on the Revolution single but that’s all I’m aware of…
Because they aren’t wrong?
Why do so many people not-involved know more than the people who were there??????
Wrong like you are!
Nicky Hopkins does not play on Sexy Sadie.
Is it possible John is having a go at himself and George in the lyrics ?
I love the song. I think it’s hilarious. But I cannot believe it’s about the Maharishi, a male. All the references are geared toward a female. I think the explanations and history – emphasis on “story” – are a smokescreen. Who considered herself No. 1? And what did this Superstar – whoever she was – do or say to or about the Beatles?
I think it is far, far, far more plausible that George’s cover, “sexy Sadie”, sounded “about a female” thus necessitating a pronoun change in the song, than your theory the entire thing is a lie and it’s a woman who was scandalised.
To me it’s a pretty basic change. They talked John out of it being a straight Maharishi song. So change a couple things here and there – a writer’s trick as old as the hills.
Is there any connection between their song “Sexy Sadie” and the nickname of Susan Atkins (one of Charles Mansons chicks)?
Manson co-opted the name for Atkins as part of his White Album obsession.
Mia Farrow wrote in her 1997 autobiography that she was groped by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi while she was at the ashram at the same time the Beatles were there. “Magic Alex” didn’t make the story up. The Beatles may have felt the least they said about it the better, but it does in fact come down to do you believe Mia or the Maharishi. Yes, groping a student at the ashram would have been considered at the least hypocritical of the yogi and his teachings, although the man never claimed to take a vow of abstinenance as far as I know.
As much as I love the White Album (it’s my definate favorite), there are a few that I could easily do without.
This is one of them. Languid and , frankly, boring. Helter Skelter follows and picks the energy back up…
gotta love that dissonant note Lennon repeats on the guitar riff outro;
badha-badha- ‘bleh’………..lol!
I love this song even if it was about an untrue rumor
According to The White album remix book, Paul plays both the organ and piano.
If you want to present yourself as «The Bible» you should fix that error.
Anyone knows what piano they used on this song? There are some VST emulation of various Abbey Road pianos, would like to try out this one!
According to Dave Rybaczewski, the author of one of the most interesting websites dedicated to our beloved Beatles, it was a Hamburg Steinway Baby Grand piano.