Written by Paul McCartney in India in 1968, ‘Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da’ was an attempt at a ska-influenced recording, although the title phrase came from a Nigerian friend.
We went to a cinema show in a village where a guy put up a mobile screen and all the villagers came along and loved it. I remember walking down a little jungle path with my guitar to get to the village from the camp. I was playing ‘Desmond has a barrow in the market place…’
Anthology
‘Ob la di, ob la da’ was a phrase McCartney had heard from a friend called Jimmy Anonmuogharan Scott Emuakpor (known as Jimmy Scott), whom he met in the Bag O’Nails club in Soho, London. The title was said to be Urhobo for ‘Life goes on’, but was actually just a family phrase.
I had a friend called Jimmy Scott who was a Nigerian conga player, who I used to meet in the clubs in London. He had a few expressions, one of which was, ‘Ob la di ob la da, life goes on, bra’. I used to love this expression… He sounded like a philosopher to me. He was a great guy anyway and I said to him, ‘I really like that expression and I’m thinking of using it,’ and I sent him a cheque in recognition of that fact later because even though I had written the whole song and he didn’t help me, it was his expression.It’s a very me song, in as much as it’s a fantasy about a couple of people who don’t really exist, Desmond and Molly. I’m keen on names too. Desmond is a very Caribbean name.
Anthology
John Lennon, by this point infatuated by Yoko Ono and addicted to heroin, hated working on ‘Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da’. He described the song as “Paul’s granny s**t”.
I might have given him a couple of lyrics, but it’s his song, his lyric.
All We Are Saying, David Sheff
McCartney’s insistence in re-recording the song a number of times with different arrangements didn’t help matters, and the process contributed to the fraught atmosphere that dominated many of the White Album sessions; balance engineer Geoff Emerick quit the sessions the day after ‘Ob-La-Di’ was completed.
McCartney’s hope was for the song to become a Beatles single, although this was vetoed by the others. Instead the Scottish group Marmalade took it to the top of the UK chart at Christmas 1968.
If the recording process was fractious, The Beatles’ version sounds unusually high-spirited. The line “Desmond stays at home and does his pretty face” was sung accidentally by McCartney and left in.
The backing vocals were also full of fun asides: listen out for Lennon and George Harrison singing “Arm!” and “Leg!” after the line “Desmond lets the children lend a hand”. Harrison can also be heard saying the word “Foot” in the final verse, after McCartney sings “Molly lets the children lend a hand”.
In the studio
The Beatles spent around 42 hours completing ‘Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da’. Recording began on Wednesday 3 July 1968, although the song was subsequently remade twice.
On the first day the rhythm track was recorded, with Paul McCartney on acoustic guitar and Ringo Starr on drums. McCartney overdubbed vocals and more guitar onto take seven, before deciding take four was better and adding guitar to that too.
The next day he added lead vocals onto take four, together with backing vocals from John Lennon and George Harrison. McCartney then recorded an additional lead vocal part.
More overdubs followed on 5 July. Three saxophones were taped, along with bongos played by Jimmy Scott. A piccolo flute was also recorded, although this was wiped during the session and replaced by another guitar part by McCartney – deliberately recorded at a high level so it distorted and sounded like a bass. That version of ‘Ob-La-Di’ can be heard on Anthology 3.
There were a lot of primitive things that we used to use in the Beatles — prehistoric machines. One of my theories about sound nowadays is that the machines back then were more f**k-upable. I’m not sure if that’s in the dictionary. But they were more destructible. You could actually make a desk [recording console] overload, whereas now they’re all made so that no matter what idiot gets on them, they won’t overload. Most of the old equipment we used, you could get to really surprise you. Now a brand-new desk is built for idiots like us to trample on. We used to do a great trick with acoustic guitars, like on ‘Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da’. I played acoustic on that, an octave above the bass line. It gave a great sound — like when you have two singers singing in octaves, it really reinforces the bass line. We got them to record the acoustic guitars in the red. The recording engineers said, ‘Oh my God! This is going to be terrible!’ We said, ‘Well, just try it.’ We had heard mistakes that happened before that and said, ‘We love that sound. What’s happening?’ And they said, ‘That’s because it’s in the red.’ So we recorded slammin’ it in the red. And these old boards would distort just enough, and compress and suck. So instead of going [imitates staccato ‘Ob La Di’ riff] dink dink dink dink, it just flowed. So, a new fuzz box just won’t go as crazy as an old one would. And it does make it all a little bit cleaner, which I’m not wild on, actually. I’m a big fan of blues records and stuff, where there’s never a clean moment. Nothing was ever clean. It was always one old, ropey mike stuck somewhere near the guitar player, and you could hear his foot more than some things.
Guitar Player, July 1990
On 8 July, however, The Beatles scrapped the recordings to date and began a remake. A dozen takes were recorded, with the group playing live. The line up was McCartney on fuzz bass, Lennon on piano, Harrison on acoustic guitar and Starr on drums, with the session taking place after the band attended a press screening of Yellow Submarine.
By this point Lennon had grown tired of recording the song. He reportedly came into the studio under the influence of drugs, sat down at the piano and banged out the introduction on the keys.
John Lennon came to the session really stoned, totally out of it on something or other, and he said, ‘All right, we’re gonna do ‘Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da’. He went straight to the piano and smashed the keys with an almighty amount of volume, twice the speed of how they’d done it before, and said, ‘This is it! Come on!’ He was really aggravated. That was the version they ended up using.
The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions, Mark Lewisohn
The 8 July session saw the group record 12 takes of ‘Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da’, after which lead and backing vocals and percussion instruments were overdubbed onto the final attempt.
The next day Paul McCartney began yet another remake, but after two attempts this was scrapped and work resumed on the first remake. The lead and backing vocals recorded the previous night were redone, along with assorted sound effects, handclaps, ho-ho-hos and what Mark Lewisohn describes as “vocal percussion”.
On 11 July three saxophones were recorded together with a bass part. The sax players’ names are not known. Four days later McCartney re-recorded his lead vocals, and ‘Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da’ was finally complete.
For all the aggravation that took place recording it, The Beatles sound like they’re having a great time! My best memory of “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da” was December 1968 when I was eight years old that a local radio station (in Hartford, Connecticut) where I lived played the song every three hours and I never missed listening to it I enjoyed it so much!
that was a time when we would hear a song and remember it most of them were that good today they are written and recorded by untalented people and the sound produced i call vomit they are puking out the tunes even the beloved country singers tunes are not memorable. i listened to cds by faith and her husband i cant remember 1 tune or lyric. i wouldnt buy their music except to feed hungry people with that said look how long these oldies have lasted including my fave ob la di we always used those words as we used come see come saw (makes no difference to me). thank you
I’m tempted to call this the ultimate Beatles single that wasn’t, except there was one of those on every album, wasn’t there?
yep
Usually more than one. Maybe as much as 50% of what the Beatles recorded was good enough to be a single, and as good, or better ,than many singles being produced at the same time by other artists.
The Beatles, unlike most other artists in the 60s didn’t just have filler on the albums around a couple single hits, but tried to fill their albums with good music. In fact, lots of their single hits never appeared on albums.
and many album songs were never put on 45’s. we white boys loved sly stone. someone said buy the albums there are songs you never hear on the radio my buy had on it 1 i had never heard . ( dont call me n_g whitey )
Technically, it WAS released as a single years later, backed with “Julia”.
https://www.discogs.com/release/3150143-The-Beatles-Ob-La-Di-Ob-La-Da
Not in the UK it wasn’t.
This a great song. I don’t understand why some people hate it. A Times poll in the UK said it was the worst song of all time! The worst songs of all time are by rubbish bands nobody knows. ‘Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da’ is far too upbeat and fun-sounding to be anywhere near the worst song in the world.
Dear Matt, clearly they’ve never heard Ted Nugent’s, “Wango Tango” ! Worst piece of musical crap of all time !
I totally agree. But then MOST of Ted Nugent’s stuff is mindless s**t.
My vote goes to the insipid “We Built This City” by the infernal Starship.
“We Built This City” was written by Elton John’s primary lyricist, Bernie Taupin. Although Bernie was a sometimes great lyricist, he also gets credit for one of the worst lines in music, in the otherwise wonderful song “Amoreena”: “And when it rains, the rain falls down…”
‘Passengers’ by Elton John
Perhaps the nadir.
Even that, as bad as it is, isn’t nearly the worst song of all time.
i heard the worst country song playing in a shopping store, these lyrics, (if i only had a million dollars), coupled with terrible music made me hurry up and finish my shopping
Yeah it’s so much fun!
A “great” song??? Seriously ? This was not worthy of the Beatles!
This song is a piece of crap not worthy of the Beatles!
Even if it didn’t make a Beatles single, the group Marmelade took it to #1 in the British charts in January 1969, staying there for a total of three weeks[should really be mentioned in the article], which is one week more than Lady Madonna had managed nine months previously, and equal to The Ballad of John and Yoko five months later.
Even if John is supposed to have referred to this song as ‘Paul’s granny s**t’, it’s hard to find an ‘actual’ quote of John’s suggesting he hated the song – his Playboy comment is very matter-of-factly: ‘Paul wrote it, I may have contributed’. Paul has even suggested otherwise; that John liked the song, but hated the process of recording it. John wasn’t really into the idea of working too much on other people’s songs from this stage on.
its my childhoods favourite song, that time i really didnt know the meaning of it i used to just familiar with the word O bloodi O blada..now i can understand little bit of it. Thanks to the composer??
This isn’t even the worst Beatles song. I Love it!
Neither do I.
I think the term “worst song” in polls is more applicable to “Revolution 9” and not “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da”. This propaganda about The White Album sessions being dominated by constant infighting has been denied by Ken Scott, who said that the only arguments that happened were more or less forgotten about 15 minutes later.
I think the most likely reason why John didn’t like working on the song was that the slow tempo must’ve made him irritated and he was absolutely right to speed up the tempo on the piano for the released version.
Why Paul even bothered doing an unnecessary remake and wasting John and George’s time, only to abandon it after two takes, I don’t know, but perhaps he was convinced by John’s persuasion that the final performance was good enough. He also played an acoustic guitar bass as well as a fuzz bass – the so-called “acoustic guitar bass” was actually him mimicking his bassline on his acoustic guitar, so this was proof that he is not afraid to try new things or play basslines on instruments other than a conventional bass guitar, something that he himself has admitted by saying he’d try anything once, even using a capo on his bass part on “Michelle”.
Yeah, I’ve loved this one since I was a child too! I’ve always suspected John & George wouldn’t have hated it so much if Paul hadn’t stubbornly insisted upon recording take after take/remake after remake.
I personally understand why people like the song but I detest the song
Von Bontee I think Harrison at least wouldn’t hated it if they didn’t spend day after day on it
John and George should have just left if Paul was so much of a perfectionist…didn’t the same thing happen with “Maxwell”?
John, George and Ringo’s gripes about the “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer” sessions going on for weeks or even 100 million takes were not only exaggerated, but also poppycock. That song only took three days to record plus a fourth session prior to mixing involved a Moog overdub and I agree with Paul saying, “Big deal. It took three days and a Moog overdub” (this may not the exact quote – I’m just paraphrasing him).
It’s simply a great song. I think Paul can be a bit too silly, while John can be a bit too serious. However, it’s interesting to note that Lennon pushed the final upbeat tempo stealing away from the reggae and turning it into um-pa music.
Which makes me think about how John & Paul worked together with irritation sometimes that sparked genius. It seems that Paul pushed John’s Revolution to a single hard rock tune not in the original concept of Lennon. Ob La Di Ob La Da and Revolution are probably two of my most favorite songs. The history is very interesting.
I know john plays the piano but do you you think he plays the little “floating fills”. Seems like maybe it was George Martin.
That’s an interesting question. Actually, the “floating fills” don’t really seem that complicated. While Martin certainly played along and influenced at the same time the musicians seemed to learn on the fly.
Also the boys had played all day gigs. It wasn’t all rock and roll either. One Beatles’ documentary contends that their musical influence was very wide in such that although not having formal training they still possessed and played formal music. In one sense you can say that Martin helped put the pieces of their musical puzzles together they already had.
Then again we don’t know who the sax players are nor every detail of this great song. Anything was possible.
Those fills are as simple as it’s possible. Just two arpeggiated chords. I read that Paul added this part on July 11th. But it wouldn’t be a surprise for me if john was responsible for that.
It’s time for a stupid theory! John was one of the sax players!
On Nicky Hopkins site it is stated he did alot of piano overdubs on Beatle tracks. Might be him.
its my childhoods favourite song, that time i really didnt know the meaning of it i used to just familiar with the word O bloodi O blada..now i can understand little bit of it. Thanks to the composer??
I love the Beatles and most of Paul’s “granny s**t” like Honey Pie and maxwell’s silver hammer but this might be the most skipped Beatles song in the catalogue for me. I absolutely see how John went nuts recording a hundred takes of this song and just started losing it.
Its ironic the song is so damn cheery given how much damage it did to the group dynamic
Hard to criticize Paul, but this is not a favorite of mine. It’s like he doesn’t have an edit button. Just because you can do it, doesn’t mean you should. It would have been better to give it to Marmalade and leave it at that.
I think this song is too colorful to be called one of the worst songs ever. Its actually fun, colorful, tells a story and its the Beatles’ attempt to SKA or Reggae related stuff back then.
But I heard the Anthology version of this song and it sounds better to me than their released version cause it sounds more colorful and the vocals and guitars sound breezy and refreshing to me in this Anthology version. So I think this song would have been better if they released the Anthology version instead. Here’s a Youtube link.
In the comments, a lot of people have said that they liked it better than the released version.
100% agree! Just listened to them side-by-side on Spotify- wow, the Anthology version is great!
Totally agree that the Anthology 3 version is way better. Paul definitely got this one wrong.
Corn + cheese = ob-la-di,ob-la-da. It is, I confess, a guilty pleasure on occasion when I have a hankering for those two.
Obladi, oblada, has nothing to do with the Yoruba culture or language. Secondly, the guy’s name is not of Yoruba origin even though he might have grew up amongst the Yorubas. It’s possible the guy had actually said a yoruba phrase that meant something else but, the hearer perceived it as such and decided to write it out as it sounded phonetically. On of such is a common phrase heard from the mouths of the colonial masters in Nigeria when they wanted their workers or slaves to lift heavy stuffs, and they yell out, “Eh sho bey,” while unbeknownst to their slaves at that time and to so many till this day who still spit it out of their mouths as a way to garner support and inner power to lift a heavy object, was derogatory and a nasty reference to the color, shape of their skin etc. The actual english phrase was ” Apes Obey” and they in turn yell back with a heave, hey, until the work gets done. Hopefully, we can all agree that the song for what it meant was just an understanding of one man about what he perceived and the eventual translation of it into a money maker. All power to the Beatles.
jimmy scott-emuakpor is my late uncle… we are urhobo from the village evwreni near warri!
They actually sound like they are having fun in the song and the piano sounds more Mccartney than Lennon but maybe he played it
I’ll have to listen for “Arm” and “Leg” and “Foot.” And also, I didn’t know that the reversing of Desmond and Molly in the last verse was accidental. I thought it was a clever twist planned by Paul.
John also says, “Home. H-o-m-e.”. LOL!
there are reports now on some sites that Nicky Hopkins overdubbed quite a few Beatles piano parts. anyone know anymore bout this?? I know he did Revolution
What’s your source on “quite a few Beatles piano parts”? Because he’s not mentioned at all by Lewisohn, who is, of course, authoritative.
Nicky Hopkins site for one
I like this song a lot and surprised to hear that this was considered one of the worst songs of all time. It is a fun, life-affirming song. I find it much better than The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill. According to Wikipedia, Ob La Di Ob La Da was a number one hit in Australia, Austria, Switzerland, and Japan as well as the cover version by Marmalade in the UK. It was the theme song for the highly regarded TV show Life Goes On in the late 80s/early 90’s.
I’ve listened to this song for over 45 years, and never once thought “reggae” or “ska” (not that I knew what either of those were when I was 8, but, now I do, and I still don’t hear it). Maybe it’s more apparent in the alternate version? I had also heard that at one point Paul was sued by a gay Montreal (?) night-club owner who said that the song referred to him and his partner, especially the last, flipped line. But I’d never heard that that was mistake and they left it in, and now I can’t find any reference to the nightclub owner (probably read it in some book back in the 70s).
Listen to the Anthology version, and you’ll hear a touch of ska, not least in Lennon’s hilarious bookends.
My mother would never us kids sing it. She thought it was Oh Bloody! Oh bloodah(?)
My aunt didn’t want us to sing the song either. A big fan of the game “Scrabble”, she whispered with a mysterious undertone in her voice that the name “Desmond” could “include some other word”. Than she mentioned that even the Name “Molly” could be open to dubious speculation, which she did not wanted “to pursue further”, and finally, just to confuse us completely, she mentioned Ezekiel 23 and droped the names “Oholaha and Oholibah” (which are definitely not in the song, of course). I still can’t make any sense of it.
Lol it could be heard that way, I never thought of that.
jimmy scott-emuakpor was my uncle. he wrote the entire song obladi oblada, mc cartney doesn’t even know what it means, nor does the average nigerian because it is a family joke. john lennon didn’t like working on the song because it wasn’t theirs. the reason for which he took his name of the songwriting credit, as the song was first said to have been written by lennon and mc cartney. the song doesn’t sound like reggae cuz it’s highlife. we’re nigerian remember?!! https://soundcloud.com/shinri/uncle-jimmy
oh yes we are Urhobo not Yoruba
Other than the similarity in the titles of the songs, that’s where the similarities end. There have been many songs with the same titled, like ‘Best of My Love’, which had nothing to do with each other, musically.
What does bra mean in life goes on bra
my dad told me it was british royal airport, but now with the story about how that guy said it, doesn’t at all make sense. i have no other conclusion that he made that up. jerk.
Brah, not bra. Short for brother. lol
Jimmy said to me he just wanted a photo on the album and he didnt get any money. According to Jimmy its a saying like cest la vi, etc.Jimmy was a manager for bad manners and died in 1984 ,buster had a memorial concert in clissold park in stokie for him .Be honest for once paul.
it sounds more like calypso to me! love the intro, though the song is a bit corny, it was a hit by the marmelade, i remember, or was it?
More than Yoko Ono; this song was the beginning, the front cover of The End. Give the boys credit for giving us twelve more months after this ordeal. The back cover, obviously: Maxwell’s Silver Hammer. Macca schmacca.
I think Honey Pie and Maxwell’s Silver Hammer are detestable, but Ob-la-di Ob-la-da has always been toe-tapping. I almost think I prefer the Anthology version, for its purity. And McCartney’s bass playing is so good it redeems the thing — not to mention Lennon’s hilarious bookends of the song. Sounds like he was having fun, at least at the beginning…
What are bookends of the song? I’ve never heard that term?
“The Bookends’ to the song refers to John’s comments at the beginning and end of the Anthology 3 version of the song.
Lennon’s hilarious bookends of the song – what is this referring to? I’ve not heard of this term.
According to Paul McCartney “Then I put the bass on and I double tracked it with an acoustic guitar”, this is supported by The Beatles Gear and at the beginning of the song, the bass part starts an octave higher than usual because it’s being played by a guitar instead of a bass.
How cool is it that on such a quintessential McCartney pop tune, the piano–both the hilarious rapid-fire opening that launches the song, and the little calliope
hook on the verses–was John’s contribution? Another great thing about their partnership – the spur-of-the-moment things like this (or Paul’s guitar on John’s “Good Morning” or his piano, drums and harmonies on BOJAY).
It’s odd how these stories get told and retold until they become fact. While they seemed to spend a great deal of time on this song (42 hours!), much of it was Paul alone or with the other musicians. The others’ contributions, at least for the first set of takes, was limited to what appears to be just singing and maybe hand claps. It wasn’t until they decided to redo it that they all played instruments. And then it was just 12 takes. That’s not a lot for them. How many takes of other songs did they do, for all three of them. 12 doesn’t seem a lot. Now, John may have been frustrated because he didn’t like the song in the first place, and he may have been the driving force to changing the tempo, but this whole story about how they spent way too much time on this song is ridiculous.
Oh, and the tempo of the song isn’t faster in the released version. It’s actually slightly slower.
This is a fun, catchy song that you can’t help but sing along to. Plus, it’s a great song for beginners to play on piano and guitar.
This is my favorite song. All I see here is the reason John was aggravated was because he was stoned most of the time and wanted to keep doing drugs. The song is awesome, I don’t understand how is it that people hate it.
funny Paul was the pothead
Just found your website. Take a bow. This is great and all your
hard work is much appreciated. Passing it along to others for sure.
There will never be a band even close to the Beatles …. I was there
in college in the ’60’s … saw them in SF. Never have or will see
the crowds they drew … no one ever will. What a treasure.
So much in so little time unprecedented. Thanks much.
Bobby
This song is the worst song the Beatles ever did. Happy, cheerful music puts me into a rage and this one is no different. It should have stayed on the cutting floor.
Who were the two little girls that sang La (x8) lahhh (really high!,) lah lah lah lah life goes on, heard starting on the Ob-la-da ONLY in the second chorus? I’d heard the story before but can’t remember. They were like sisters that had won a singing contest or something.
There actually John and George singing three semitones lower than the basic track being played at normal speed. Another George Martin studio trick.
Rearranged it spells diabla la Boda , ie satanic wedding, story of uniting james pauls soul with sir pauls body, so life could go on after james paul died, is why she (james paul) was a singer in a band, they get married and both take care of HIS face (Not an accident left in, intentional show in the soul of Jim shares the body of spm). Not saying Paul really died just saying they really played the hoax and this is the paul is dead meaning of this goofy but dark song, sing along now if you can, miss him.
This song is a piece of garbage, not worthy of Paul.
It is not garbage. John’s granny music jibe underlay his inherent snobbery. And this from the man who went on to write the truly worst song of all time, the execrable Woman is the * of the World. But of course, if McCartney had written this song it would be yelled from the roof tops to this very day. Lennon and his fans have always managed to keep it under the radar. And they call the Paul the PR Beatle.
John also wrote ‘Goodnight’ which if had it been Paul, he would have also labelled it ‘granny music’ lol
I was never a fan until I heard my 5 year old sing it with abundant joy. That’s the magic, it continues to reach multi generations old and young.
it’s a great song,it’s actually white reggae but very advanced for its day.Its never a granny song,John had some funny views at times.You can hear the off the wall approach in its making.
They even resurrected it for a bit during Get Back, so clearly not black-listed by the others at the time.
I love Desmond’s apparent sex change at the end. I know it was an error that they just left in, but it really gives the song a fun punch line
This site is a godsend. You should consider updating the personnel list to include the saxophones and percussionist mentioned in the session info –
https://www.beatlesbible.com/1968/07/05/recording-ob-la-di-ob-la-da-3/
That wasn’t the final version – the song was re-recorded after that session. I put the saxophonists’ names in because there’s a good chance that they were used again, but I don’t think Jimmy Scott appears on the album.
One of the most uplifting songs in the entire Beatles catalog! The sax parts are absolutely brilliant. Perfect get-together song that anyone can learn in minutes. The trick is to play it in A, like the original, before it was raised to Bb. The bass part is ten times easier in A. So are the guitar chords.
Can’t reconcile that the man that wrote this silly piece of pap is the same man responsible for
“Here There and Everywhere”, “For No One” and “Golden Slumbers”. I agree with the poster above
who said that Paul had a problem with self-editing.
Everyone has Beatle songs they don’t care for as much as others, but considering the amount of people this song has brought happiness and joy to, seems his self-editing is fine.
Enjoy it for what it is. Happy-go-lucky pap is no different from some of the cosmic pap John and George wrote. Self-editing was a problem for all of them after 1967 because of over-reliance on certain substances in my opinion
I listed three songs (of many) that show Paul’s brilliance. Does that mean I have to like them all? And I would say that when one describes a song as “pap” you can pretty much infer they’re not going to enjoy it.
The first version, which appeared on Anthology, sounds like Ringo on drums. But when you listen to the released version, and the drums isolated, it sounds more like Paul playing. The style is different from how Ringo plays on the earlier version, plus the drum fills sound more like how Paul would play, than Ringo.
Can anyone tell me who sings the first line of this song? Paul or John?
Ming,
Paul McCartney sang the first line of the song “Desmond has a barrow in the marketplace”. Since Paul wrote “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da” he is the Lead singer.
IMO it has a “barrelhouse” bass line. I LIKE it.