Written primarily by John Lennon, ‘It’s Only Love’ first appeared on the second side of the Help! album. It originally had the working title ‘That’s A Nice Hat’.
Lennon later spoke of his embarrassment at the triteness of the lyrics. He told Hit Parader magazine: “That’s the one song I really hate of mine. Terrible lyric.” In another interview he named ‘It’s Only Love’ and Rubber Soul’s ‘Run For Your Life’ as his least favourite Beatles songs.
‘It’s Only Love’ is mine. I always thought it was a lousy song. The lyrics were abysmal. I always hated that song.
All We Are Saying, David Sheff
Paul McCartney, who co-wrote the song at Lennon’s home in Weybridge, was slightly more forgiving.
Sometimes we didn’t fight it if the lyric came out rather bland on some of those filler songs like ‘It’s Only Love’. If a lyric was really bad we’d edit it, but we weren’t that fussy about it, because it’s only a rock ‘n’ roll song. I mean, this is not literature.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
In his book Revolution In The Head, Ian MacDonald explained how Lennon’s melodies tended to be ‘horizontal’ in nature, often based around a single repeated note, whereas McCartney’s would climb up and down the scales ‘vertically’.
‘It’s Only Love’, however, is more melodically ‘vertical’ than many of Lennon’s compositions of the time. The winding tune and explorative chord sequence showed that he wasn’t simply going through the motions of songwriting, and he evidently regarded both highly enough to rework them in 1967 for the Sgt Pepper song ‘Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite!’.
In the studio
The Beatles recorded ‘It’s Only Love’ during an afternoon session on 15 June 1965. It took six takes to get right, though only four of those were complete.
Lennon double-tracked his vocals onto take six, and five guitars were recorded: two acoustic, including a 12-string; and three electric guitars, with a tremolo effect applied to Harrison’s 12-string Rickenbacker.
Take two of ‘It’s Only Love’ was included on Anthology 2 in 1996, along with the aborted take three from the session. Interestingly, Ringo Starr’s drum part on take two was very similar to that later heard on another Lennon song, Rubber Soul’s ‘In My Life’.
Harrison also played acoustic guitar (in addition to his lead guitar) when the backing track was recorded. He played the 12-string acoustic capoed at the fifth fret. You can hear it clearly on the early take on Anthology 2, entering at 00:06. In the final mix this backing track was mixed to the left channel (compare the two versions).
The right channel has Harrison’s lead plus a dry “chick” electric guitar playing chords in the verses (probably Lennon).
Lennon may have thought “It’s Only Love” was one of his more lousy songs but I’ve always thought it was a pretty classy one.
Brian, I too have always had a fondness for this song. It’s quite pretty and kind of dreamy. The middle is especially good too. Wonder what Paul’s contribution was?
I couldn’t agree more. One of my favourite Lennon tunes. It really expresses his unique voice brilliantly. And DIFFERENT again!
me to. wonder if John hated it because it showed to much of his “human side” for lack of a better term. Loved the guitar parts on here. those 12 strings just made the song for me
I remembered this song years after it came out. I absolutely love it and love singing it. Too bad, John and Paul didn’t like it. Why do I love this song? Who knows why anybody love a particular song. I saw The Beatles when I was 13 years only in Baltimore, Maryland and have followed music my whole life. While I like all The Beatles music really, another one I not is “In My Life.
Thanks for the Who KNOWS WHY. my favorite songs by the Beatles(it is a 3 way tie) are ones most people would not pick out as their favorites-I’ll Follow The Sun, Oh Darling, I Will. and some of the ones that other people really liked I don’t care that much for
It is a wonderful tender gorgeous song!
John seemed to base his liking for his own songs purely on the lyrics. If the lyrics meant something to him then he would like the song (Help, Don’t Let Me Down, etc) but hated this song which is by far the Beatles worst lyric IMO …. if he’d written better lyrics he’d probably have liked it.
I agree. “It’s Only Love” is a bittersweet, ironic ode to young love. We play it as a cover song in our Classic 60s Rock band.
Agree! I just played it on my acoustic. I’ve always really liked it quite a bit
After listening to It’s Only Love on the remastered mono CD, I wondered why the first (“I”) and third (“high”) words contain a noticeable warble that I never picked up on before. I also checked out the remastered stereo CD, and then the vinyl, and it appears on all of them. Almost sounds like there was a problem with the master tape, or some mild feedback. Any idea what caused it to sound like this, and not “smoother”?
Agreed, but I always thought it was simply distortion. After the word “high” it was very Clean the rest of the way. My guess is -the engineer simply brought the fader down a pinch. Lyric-wise…sure,a little Weak, BUT with every collection of “Masterpieces, there’s bound 2 b a so-so track,now & then.
Could be the compressor pumping.
The anthology version is just beautiful.
That can’t be a Leslie creating that warbling guitar tone – wasn’t “Tomorrow Never Knows” famously their first occasion to employ one for anything other than the intended Hammond organ?
To me, it just sounds like a guitar amplifier with a vibrato or tremelo unit; and, indeed, a Google search turns up many guitarists who, independently of one another, specifically cite a Magnatone amp as the probable source.
You’re right – it was a tremolo effect, not a Leslie speaker. I’ve amended the article.
Well according to many the guitar is sent through a leslie. This site has some of the songs that have the leslie guitar effect. Apparently not on this site “You Like Me Too Much” has the leslie effect on piano.
http://www.nmia.com/~vrbass/vibratone/VibratoneSongs.htm
According to that site it may a Fender amp effect. I don’t think Leslie speakers were removed from Hammond organs until 1966, though I may be wrong.
That’s an informative page Nelson linked to! To my ears, “It’s Only Love” still doesn’t have that distinctive swirly Leslie sound, the way that “Bumble Bee” and “The Birds And The Bees” and everything else I recognize on that page does, but I suppose it’s possible I’m wrong. (Even though the guy who compiled the page invites people to make corrections of any mistakes he may have made…)
Lesley speakers were never “removed” from Hammond organs, as they were manufactured and marketed by a third party and housed in a separate cabinet that was sold separately from the Hammond organ from day one. The organs typically had an onboard vibrato effect, but once the Lesley speaker became the standard, the onboard effect was somewhat unnecessary and many players opted to leave it turned off in favor of the Lesley. Also, chances are that if a studio, church, or club had a Hammond, it would have been a console model without internal speakers, whereas the spinet models with the built-in speakers would have been more commonly found in people’s living rooms.
George is using a tremolo effect on one of his overdubbed guitar tracks, and uses his volume pedal on another. The volume pedal (often mistaken for a wah-wah pedal) was also used by George on “I Need You” as well as “Yes It Is”.
I heard a local band in north Wales do this one live in 1966. At that time, the lead guitarist and singer used a Selmer Zodiac Twin 50 with the green coloured blinking eye on the front, set at a very high speed. Playing a Rickenbacker through it, he really captured John’s guitar sound. I know JL used a Selmer on occasions. It’s not impossible it could have been this setup.
Consider what equipment they were using. If you try the vibrato effect on a Vox AC30 I reckon it’s that. I’m sure it’s not a Lesley.
There seems to be a misunderstanding on the part of most folks here regarding “tremolo” vs. “vibrato” at least as these terms have come to be understood in the context of electric guitar. The latter indicates pitch modulation while to former indicates volume modulation. These terms are commonly confused… in fact, Fender and Vox amps refer to their onboard tremolo effect as “vibrato”!
To my ear, the warbling sound on the intro is very clearly vibrato. And this would explain why people have theorized that it is a Lesley speaker (which produces modulations in pitch and volume) or a Magnatone amp, which has a true vibrato onboard effect. I have no idea if they had a Magnatone amp in the studio or if George owned one, nor do I know if an outboard vibrato effect was available in 1965. Nor do I know when the Beatles first started putting piano and electric guitar through a Lesley speaker. BUT… it definitely sounds like vibrato to me.
the tremolo effect guitar riff is played twice by George, or are George & John playing together ?
They were overdubbing alot by and it could be Paul on some of the guitars.
Paul didn’t play any guitar on this song – only bass guitar.
What a beautiful melody. George’s playing with the 12-string acoustic guitar (heard best on the Anthology CD) is magnificent. And the Anthology version offers a good contrast in the strumming styles of George and John. Obviously, George Martin and the three surviving Beatles thought the song quite good enough for inclusion in the Anthology CD.
I always thought the repetition of the long “i” in the lyrics was unique and beautiful…
“I… high… I… by… my… my… sight… nighttime… bright… sigh… insides… fly… Why… I… shy… I’m… beside… etc.”
Most groups would kill for what John calls trite and abysmal. No slam necessarily to Paul, but truly the lyrics approach Paul’s candy lightness and, quite frankly, still out performs many of his solo outings – especially the ‘Wild Life’ collection.
One of my favourite, lesser known Beatles songs, for which I have a great fondness. One I learned to play as a budding guitarist, there is some good/unusual chord sequencing in it.
A great melody. I can even relate to the words – it’s boy-girl stuff.
Anyone noticed how similar this song is to “Mr Kite”? Seems like J subconciously liked the melody!
Right you are–good observation, I had never noticed!
Yes…definately…I made a comment years ago on I believe Facebookabout these two songs!! We’ve got good ears…even with my hearing disability?
I was quite surprised to find John and Paul weren’t fans of this one. I quite like the admitedly cheesy lyrics, and the melody is very beautiful to me.
Is there any other example of John (jokingly) “trilling” the r, in a rhotic way, like he does in the word “bright”: “Just the sight of you makes nighttime bright”. I always laugh at that.
I think John has to laugh as well, does´t he? The “very” sounds as if he can´t suppress a short laughter.
I know! It’s so endearing. He doesn’t “trill” the r in the demo/”Anthology” version, I think, so one has to assume it was a spur of the moment kind of thing that ended up in the final version.
Yes, on Maggie Mae he trills the word ‘robbing’ ….:-)
Not John, but Paul does it in When I’m Sixty-Four: “Grrandchildrren on yurr knee”, in which I believe is an impression of a rustic dialect.
Ever notice the lead singing credit for this song on the British Help! is for John but on the American Rubber Soul the singing credit goes to “John and Paul”? Who added Paul and what was he or she hearing?
Great observations on John’s wit in his songwriting. However, not to throw a wet blanket on everyone,but this is perhaps the first reference to any drug use in their songs. “I get high….” Not many listeners at the time may have picked that up – sounds innocent enough – but things were changing in the lives of the boys. I don’t think that that phrase was in common use for any type of “good-feeling” in 1965. Looking back at the progression of time and songs they wrote, this little subtle reference may tell volumes about a change of direction in both life-style and song craftsmanship.
Ha! I noticed that too. “She’s A Woman” mentions turn-ons, but “It’s Only Love” has the first get-high, as far as I know. And both mentions escaped the broadcast censors?….
I think It´s Only Love is one of The Beatles best songs! It´s a masterpiece. A straight melody — it´s very difficult to compose a seemingly simple melody, Lennon was always able to that — and the hook “butterfly” in a +chord on the guitar. And Lennon´s fantastical voice; tender and desperate. The song was released together with Yesterday in the Help album in August 1965. I always thought that Only Love was as good as Yesterday, or better.
There is something strange with Lennon´s contemt for the song. I am sure the reason why he hated it was another than he said. And because Lennon despised it, McCartney said it was a filler, and all later critics said the same.
It’s Paul’s fault again. None of the critics could think for themselves. Balderdash!
Roll my eyes and shake my head….
You’re Lennon/Love – McCartney/Hate is really beginning to sound psychotic. (Seriously, you are a master troll, or ……). One of the Beatles best songs? As good or better than Yesterday? My goodness.
This is a pleasant song, it’s melody certainly outshines the lyrics. But great it is not.
Lennon hated it because he hated it, and McCartney recognized it for what it is. Album filler. End of story.
I absolutely agree with you. Very often the fans know better than the critics.
And neither knows better than the writers themselves.
No matter what John said about this song one things for sure I have yet to meet a Woman who didn’t like it 🙂 thanks John
Through the years of John’s interviews, I believe at some point he hated every song he wrote. This was on the American Rubber Soul. That whole period in my life was special, as I was just going into high school, leaving many old friends behind. Love this song. And yeah, its descending melody line would be repeated in Mr.Kite.
I wouldn’t call it a masterpiece, but it is still a very nice song. I have always liked it.
I hear John supressing a laughter after , or during “very bright”, makes me cheer up everytime since 76! beautiful melody, cheesy lyrics, was that the reason why he almost cracked up ? because this set of lyrics wasn’t comparable to Dylan’s output at the time? only he knows!
John particularly did not like this, but I love this songs melody. It is beautiful. Loved it when I first heard this on “Love Songs”. Would have fitted in well on the film and soundtrack of “Help!”, but ended up on side two. Love George Harrisons 12 string acoustic guitar work on this.
Someone could write me the line of rhythm guitar in a sketch scheme, please? Many thanks!
It’s still my favorite song from that album.
On Thursday, May 20th of 1971 John selected “Working Class Hero” as his favorite composition and stated that “It’s Only Love” was at the other end of the scale.
I love this one, talks ’bout me…
“..why am I so shy, when I’m beside you”…
“…but it’s so hard loving you,
yes it’s so hard loving you,
loving youuuu”
“It’s Only Love” is a great song! What did John Lennon know, anyway? He’s just the greatest songwriter ever. LOL! Great Songwriters have higher standards and perceive songs differently than us peasant listeners. I think John Lennon wanted any old excuse to leave the Beatles even back then. The song is on the “Help!” album after all…
Not a very clever tune, but still better than most else non-Beatles.
I swear I hear Paul on it
Just heard this song today on Sirius and I must say I remember it fondly. I like it!
When John said it was a lousy song he had to be in a bad mood that day. There’s no more Beatles feel of that period than it’s only love. It’s soulful John. It doesn’t get much better than this.
I wouldn’t mind writing so “lousy” a song as It’s Only Love, and performing it so “abysmally”!
It’s only love is one of the songs that break my heart. To me the lyrics are deeply honest and give me shivers. The corus is,a killer
The Anthology version is pretty good; John strums hard and sings it like he means it, they should have put that on the album. Unfortunately, they used the last take by which time John sounds bored and smeared it with sickly leslie guitar, less was more in this case.
how about a shoutout for the gorgeous part in the end, where he goes into
falsetto- gives me butterflies!
Been going back and forth with a guy on Quora about the meaning of this song. He says it’s Lennon creating a character who is in love for the first time; I say it’s at least partly about Cynthia (fighting every night, so hard loving you). I base this also on the fact that by ’65 John is clearly writing about himself and his unhappiness in his life/marriage (Nowhere Man, Hide Your Love Away, Help, etc.). I really can’t imagine him at that point deciding to write a song from a lovestruck 15-yr-old’s point of view.
However there are indeed all those lovebird lyrics–why am I so shy when I’m beside you, butterflies, etc. But could it be he’s mixing lyrics about conflict with Cynthia with lyrics about someone else he’s in love with? The girl in Norwegian Wood maybe? Or, assuming it’s not about homosexuality (as some theorize), the “love” in “You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away”?
Interested in others’ thoughts about this. I do love the song, even though some of the verse lyrics seem a little sloppy.