‘Glass Onion’ was John Lennon’s answer to those who looked for hidden meanings in The Beatles’ music. It was a song deliberately filled with red herrings, obscure imagery and allusions to past works.
Fully aware of the power of The Beatles’ own mythology, and with a general dislike of those who over-interpreted his work, Lennon deliberately inserted references to ‘I Am The Walrus’, ‘Strawberry Fields Forever’, ‘Lady Madonna’, ‘The Fool On The Hill’, and ‘Fixing A Hole’.
The effect is a kaleidoscopic look through the group’s back pages. ‘Lady Madonna’, whose protagonist reappears in ‘Glass Onion’, contained a reference to ‘I Am The Walrus’ (“See how they run”).
That song, in turn, featured the line “See how they fly like Lucy in the sky”, a clear reference to Sgt Pepper’s psychedelic masterpiece. The effect is of a continual strand running through The Beatles’ works, even if such a strand was never intended in the first place.
That’s me, just doing a throwaway song, à la ‘Walrus’, à la everything I’ve ever written. I threw the line in – ‘the Walrus was Paul’ – just to confuse everybody a bit more. And I thought Walrus has now become me, meaning ‘I am the one.’ Only it didn’t mean that in this song.It could have been ‘the fox terrier is Paul,’ you know. I mean, it’s just a bit of poetry. It was just thrown in like that.
All We Are Saying, David Sheff
Although it was written in 1968, Lennon later claimed the line was written because he was intending to leave The Beatles.
Well, that was a joke. The line was put in partly because I was feeling guilty because I was with Yoko and I was leaving Paul. I was trying – I don’t know. It’s a very perverse way of saying to Paul, you know, ‘Here, have this crumb, this illusion – this stroke, because I’m leaving’.
All We Are Saying, David Sheff
McCartney later revealed that he wore the walrus costume during the photo shoot for the album and EP cover, but Lennon who wore it during the film.
The big one. Very good question. I tell you what it was. In the stills we had taken, I was the one with the walrus head on – in the film it’s different. So John then immortalised it in ‘Glass Onion’, ‘I’ve got news for you all [sic], the walrus was Paul’. Obviously at the time you don’t care, it’s just a walrus head.
Q magazine, January 1998
As well as the references to past Beatles songs, Lennon also inserted a number of new images to assist further myth-making. These were bent backed tulips, the cast iron shore, a dove-tail joint and the glass onion of the title.
‘Glass Onion’ was a name suggested by Lennon for The Iveys, a Swansea group who signed to Apple in 1968 and later became Badfinger. Lennon retained a liking for the phrase ‘glass onion’, which had apt connotations of both transparency and multiple layers.
The Cast Iron Shore is a real place in Liverpool, sometimes known locally as the Cassie. A dovetail joint, meanwhile, is even less enigmatic, being a common feature of woodwork joinery. However, Lennon may have liked the use of the word ‘joint’, presumably expecting many to see it as a reference to a cannabis reefer.
The bent backed tulips are believed to have been inspired by the table arrangement at Parkes, a then-fashionable restaurant on London’s Beauchamp Place.
You’d be in Parkes sitting around your table wondering what was going on with the flowers and then you’d realise that they were actually tulips with their petals bent all the way back, so that you could see the obverse side of the petals and also the stamen. This is what John meant about ‘seeing how the other half lives’. He meant seeing how the other half of the flower lives but also, because it was an expensive restaurant, how the other half of society lived.
A Hard Day’s Write, Steve Turner
Anthology 3 contains two versions of ‘Glass Onion’. The first of these was a demo recorded at Kinfauns, George Harrison‘s bungalow in Esher, Surrey. It features Lennon on acoustic guitar and double-tracked vocals, and lapses into gobbledigook where the lyrics were unfinished.
The second version was recorded in Abbey Road, and contains a selection of sound effects assembled by Lennon. These include a telephone ring, smashing glass, an organ note and a loop of the BBC football commentator Kenneth Wolstenholme exclaiming “It’s a goal!” The effects were later replaced by the string arrangement which ends the song.
In the studio
The Beatles began recording ‘Glass Onion’ on 11 September 1968. They taped 34 attempts at the basic rhythm track, of which take 33 was the best.
The next day John Lennon recorded his lead vocals and Ringo Starr taped a tambourine part. On 13 September piano and another drum track were added, and three days later Paul McCartney recorded a brief recorder part.
The sound effects, later discarded, were assembled on 20 September. Their replacement was recorded on 10 October: eight string musicians playing a short score by George Martin.
A thought about the “Walrus Was Paul” line – I have read John’s quote how this was his way of thanking Paul for keeping things together.
At the same time, John also mentioned that after saying “I am the Walrus” he later realized that in actual story, the Walrus was the big capitalist who took all the oysters for himself.
This causes me to wonder if John’s remarks about thanking Paul (made years later) aside, as to whether this line was actually a sly swipe at Paul at the time he wrote it. Paul becoming the greedy one etc.
Remember the White Album was the beginning of their disintegration as a band and as partners.
Thoughts?
I seem to remember reading the “thanking Paul” comment by John for the first time in the Rolling Stone interview “Lennon Remembers” which was released in January 1971.
It didn’t read as though the Walrus story line and Paul were somehow being connected by John in the interview.
This is called over-interpretation. It doesn’t mean anything.
I heard that Paul had died in 1966, I told you about strawberry fields you the place where nothing is real .that verse was referring to Paul , the one you’re seeing now it’s not the real Paul
I don’t think Lennon realized his “mistake” of not being calling it “I am the Carpenter” until much later, but I guess no one really knows…I don’t think it was a “swipe” at Paul, I just think he threw it in there for fun, which is the way John intended this song to be. See, we’re doing it, by even discussing the lyrics I suppose we’re proving Lennon’s point of looking too hard at the lyrics, but it’s so much fun!
StarrTime,
You said it.
Glass Onion means not having to think .
sounds bout right..john…rebelliously delicious
I believe Lennon realized his mistake about the Walrus being the bad guy pretty soon after the song came out. I believe it’s covered in the Hunter Davies “authorized bio” which came about before the White Album.
I’m not saying for sure if it was a swipe – however at that time period, Lennon never wrote lyrics without understanding their full impact.
Just one view on it.
What were some of the elements used on the Love album for this song?
My favorite Paul bassline. Not saying it was the best – just my fave.
I LOVE this song not for the intricasies and ambiguities of lyrics but just the SOUND of it. What a groovy 4/4 tempo. And the cello parts are fantastic. One of my faves of theirs.
I know exactly what you mean the bass tone is unusual for Paul sounds like he’s playing a Fender a Jazz bass using a pick and mutes for that lovely percussive tone.
I also really like the bass–a very White Album tone. To me it sounds like two bass parts, both mixed left, one with a conventional bassy tone and one with a very trebly tone, playing almost but not quite in unison. As you say the trebly one could be the Jazz Bass; or it could be the Fender Bass VI.
The bass on “Glass Onion” really stands out and both this webpage and Walter Everett confirm that it was in fact Paul playing his Fender Jazz Bass with its typical clicky sound similar to what John Paul Jones played on “Whole Lotta Love” by Led Zeppelin.
Here’s some trivia about Ringo’s drumming: he isn’t just using his Ludwig Black Oyster Pearl drum kit, but he is also using his 5-piece Ludwig Hollywood drum kit as well – yes, the same one that he played on “Let it Be”, the Get Back sessions at Twickenham, Savile Row and the Apple rooftop concert and the sessions for Abbey Road. He just set it up alongside his existing Black Oyster Pearl bass drum and if you want to see a photo of it, just click here. He also had a second crash cymbal too and I’ve seen other photographs of this hybrid double bass kit.
Always found the addition of strings spoilt the groove on Onion.
I agree. Too much George Martin, not enough George Harrison. They should have encouraged Mr. H. to play slide guitar on this one.
George wasn’t playing slide guitar yet and he is still very prominent on the song on his distorted electric guitar; besides, the idea for strings and not John’s tape loops came from George Martin and you can listen to the tape loops version on Anthology 3.
The strings are actually a very nice accompaniment, not a distraction, and as far as the tape loops, they contained a telephone ringing, an organ note (presumably played by John himself), a shattering window and BBC sports commentator Kenneth Wolstenholme announcing a goal.
I’m a huge Lennon fan, my favorite Beatle, but sometimes when he talks about his disdain for people retrospectively interpreting his lyrics, and then he goes and says something like well, the walrus line was actually about me planning on leaving the Beatles…eh, that comes off like an after-the-fact interpretation of what he may have subconsciously been thinking at the time.
I have heard that Paul used a baritone guitar to double his bass lines on many songs on the WA – something you can clearly hear on Glass Onion. Definitely he used the same technique on While My Guitar Gently Weeps…the bass sounds are pretty similar on these two WA songs. A really unique sound!
It’s just a Fender VI on this track. This short-scale 6-string bass/long-scale baritone guitar (the distinction is blurry with this model) was also featured on several other White Album/Let It Be/Abbey Road tracks (when George and John played bass, it was always this one after 1968). No doubling here, it’s somehwere between a baritone and a bass!
Yes sounds like a Fender VI to me too. Which leads to the question. Did Paul have one? Don’t think so but … Or is it the right handed Fender VI John (Helter Skelter among other things) and George both played on occasion? If so who is playing? Its a great bass line and I think any of the 3 of them were capable of it, I had always thought it was my favourite McCartney line and now I am wondering.
It’s Paul playing his Fender Jazz Bass with its trademark clicky tone and flatwound strings as well as a heavy picking style – just follow this page http://www.thecanteen.com/mccartney7.html and it confirms that the bass playing on “Glass Onion” was Paul on his Fender Jazz Bass.
No, it’s Paul playing his Fender Jazz Bass and given the combination of its clicky tone, flatwound strings and a heavy picking style, it can be easily misconstrued for a Fender Bass IV.
There are certainly two basses at play. One at the left channel, one in the middle. The thick bas being in the left channel.
No, there isn’t – it’s Paul playing his Fender Jazz Bass.
A glass onion is a type of light fixture, basically a squashed globe with a bulb in it.
The things you learn while remodeling your house…
That’s a nice discovery! This sheds some new light on matters, although we will probably never be sure if that’s actually where Lennon got the title from.
Ive heard it is also a like a derrogatory slang for a window on a coffin so the corpse/spirit can see out and people can see in if the body was too putrified to be exposed before the viewing i imagine the stench would be terrible as well, making a pun about double entendres as the the onion has many layers where you can expose deeper meaning (or more onion ) as you peel away, also the closer to the truth you get the smell gets stronger . There is way more to this song than that, that is if you are seeking clues about events in pepperland
It always surprised me that John believed the other Beatles (hell, the whole world in his mind) were “jealous” of his relationship with Yoko. It’s the height of arrogance and presumption, and a weird self-justification for his actions (the “I had to take heroin, and so did the often pregnant Yoko – because THEY were all so uncomfortable and jealous of our unmatched love”). Here on Glass Onion, John is claiming that he’s “throwing Paul a crumb of niceness – cos I have Yoko and I am leaving him!” Considering Paul had Linda (and could of had any woman he wanted then), and George had Patti Boyd, WHY would they be “jealous” of John and Yoko? Did John think so little of Paul that he had to pity him with cryptic references in his song?
That is a truly fascinating insight. I mean that.
And the contemptuous tone of John’s explanation of the crumb thrown to Paul – interesting how such unpleasantries get excused or rather ignored when John gets lorded on the one hand as a figurehead of peace. There was a hell of a lot of self-delusion and self-righteousness in the bubble he inhabited with Yoko Ono.
If you had read Francie Schwartz’s “Body Count” you would have discovered that in the summer of 1968 Paul sent John and Yoko anonymous letters criticizing John for being with “that Jap”. When John asked Paul about the letters all Paul did in response was that he tried to shrug it off as nothing.
The press in London described Yoko as “ugly” and for being “that Japanese woman”. The British Press were still thinking with World War Two mentality like the British soldiers were still fighting the Japanese in Burma.
I used to glance at the British newspapers back then and I couldn’t believe the flak that John and Yoko took (on the front page) for just being together.
Don’t believe what Francie Schwartz wrote in her book and neither John nor Yoko ever confirmed or mentioned the alleged incident involving Paul leaving an insulting note with an ethnic slur for a Japanese person.
Paul does not wear the walrus costume in Magical Mystery Tour. It is John sitting at the piano who turns into the walrus. Also on the cover of MMT the hippo (Paul) is wearing a wristwatch on his right wrist. The rabbit (George) and chicken (Ringo) are wearing watches on their left wrists.
I was going to say, Scott, and you are right: Paul isn’t wearing the walrus costume in the video. Since John wrote it, it made sense for him to wear it, and I can’t find any quotes of Paul saying he wore the walrus costume either. If he watches the clip on YouTube, it’ll perhaps refresh his memory and he’ll realize that he actually wore the hippo costume.
Funny how James Bond left his mark on the boys (You only live twice came out in 67), since this is one of two songs on the White Album featuring the Bond theme (“Oh yeah”). The other one being “Savoy Truffle”.
Good point. And on Hey Bulldog around the same time.
The Scottish band Travis were originally called Glass Onion. I remember watching them in a Glasgow pub (Nice n’ Sleazy’s), probably around mid/late nineties under this moniker.
Surprised Ringo’s snares weren’t mentioned. The first few snare crashes (such as the one that opens the song) have extra snares overdubbed (this is the “second drum part”).
When it came to overdub a part (probably the recorder), Ken Scott did not trust Chris Thomas to deal with the tape machine, and so insisted on doing it himself. After several aborted attempts, Scott accidentally wiped the overdubbed snare at 1:19. Fortunately, Lennon liked the new sound – he didn’t want the loudest part of the song to contrast too sharply with the soft recorder.
You went to the Sound Of Abbey Road talk as well? I learnt that too!
Those wonderful snare crashes sound like Ringo announcing “I’m back!” after two songs featuring Paul on drums and they always bring a smile to my face for that reason.
There’s a restaraunt in South Carolina called the Glass Onion.
Good thing Paul “revealed” to us it was him in the Walrus costume. The walrus playing a lefty bass wasn’t a dead giveaway. hehe
“Glass Onion” is a great John Lennon composition off the wonderful “White Album”.It is well explained on this websites editorial how this was Lennon’s way of answering those that read too much in to The Beatles lyrics. In so doing he creates another brilliant song.
Love Johns witty tongue in cheek lyrics on this songs and others. Brilliant!
“I told you about the walrus and me, man
You know we’re as close as can be, man
Well here’s another clue for you all
The walrus was Paul.”
This is his loving line to Paul. Just as Hey Jude is about encouraging John to go for it with Yoko.
Hey Jude was written for Julian Lennon as his mother Cynthia and John Lennon had just split. Paul explains this in the Anthology. John thought it was written about him, but it was for Julian to help cope with the split.
“Glass Onion” is a very interesting song, one in which the lyrics are truly reflected by the song’s title. If we gaze into a glass onion, we would see fragmented prisms of light and distorted images. Lyrically, the song is composed of a series of fragmented images of Lennon’s life as a person and as a Beatle. You can see this in his references to Beatles’ songs, his poetic creativity, his reality distorted by drugs, etc. Also, Lennon was a huge fan of Lewis Carroll. The “Walrus and the Carpenter”, I’m sure, must have visually and imaginatively come into play for Lennon on multiple levels. Maybe what John is saying, is that when he looks back on his life, it is like looking into a glass onion. The Glass Onion is both a symbol and an image. It is literal and figurative. Lennon uses “light” (and reflection and distortion) for us visually and to illuminate us. It is poetic and brilliant. It is: John Lennon!
Brilliant. Close to 70 now,and this is one of the best comments made. My only hope is that the love for these masters will live on.
I take it to mean we perceive everything distorted by our own biases like we’re looking through a glass onion.
Even though Lennon explained the song people still read none existent meanings into it! Waste of time song writers explaining anything isn’t it!
Love this song, and with the self-referential lyrics it becomes an important part of the Beatles’ mythology. It seems a bit out of place on the White album though, the psychedelic imagery seems more in tune with Sgt Pepper or MMT. Good decision to scrap the sound effects in an earlier version of the song, the coda by George Martin is great and a perfect transition into “Dear Prudence”.
Love this little gem. Not one of The Beatles most well known but such a funky little tune.
This is one of their songs which shows how much George Martin really was a 5th Beatle. It’s a great song, but without Martin’s funky string arrangement it would be utterly forgettable rubbish. It’s the strings that really make this song special.
It’s an enjoyable song to listen to, but doesn’t mean anything. Another “bunch of words and phrases” mumbo-jumbo from this Lennon-period.
I love the little recorder notes after John sings about “The Fool on the Hill.” Paul’s clever nod to his own song, I imagine.
I always considered this a throw-away, a number of which populate the White Album. On a good listen, it actually is a neglected gem. Its allusiveness is superb and its artistry is exquisite. It uses the crazy search for (at the time) Beatle clues to – nuttiness, and mocks it exquisitely. The Beatles play extremely well here. Much to appreciate tonally, especially the step to a minor key, and has been mentioned, the acidic bass playing by Paul!
Can’t find any references or images relating to “bent backed tulips.” That may have been the term in 1968, or just Lennon’s own description. Today, it seems they’re called “reflexed” tulips. Have to admit, it doesn’t have the same ring.
https://education.teamflower.org/learn/design/ssl/video-reflexing-tulips-and-roses
I always wondered why this song was slowed down on the album? When pitched up to the original speed it rocks much better.