The last song recorded for Rubber Soul, ‘Girl’ was mostly written by John Lennon. It explored the notion of the ideal woman, and touched upon Lennon’s feelings towards Christianity.
This was about a dream girl. When Paul and I wrote lyrics in the old days we used to laugh about it like the Tin Pan Alley people would. And it was only later on that we tried to match the lyrics to the tune. I like this one. It was one of my best.
Of the Rubber Soul songs, musically it is most closely related to McCartney’s ‘Michelle’, with its acoustic instrumentation, minor chord changes and skillful vocal harmonies. Part of the music for ‘Girl’ was actually written by McCartney while on a Greek holiday in September 1963.
In the song ‘Girl’ that John wrote, there’s a Zorba-like thing at the end that I wrote which came from that holiday. I was very impressed with another culture’s approach because it was slightly different from what we did. We just did it on acoustic guitars instead of bouzoukis.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
Lyrically, meanwhile, it presented a femme fatale figure, ‘the kind of girl you want so much it makes you sorry’, whom the song’s protagonist finds himself helplessly drawn towards.
‘Girl’ is real. There is no such thing as the girl; she was a dream, but the words are all right. It wasn’t just a song, and it was about that girl – that turned out to be Yoko, in the end – the one that a lot of us were looking for.
Anthology
The sharp intake of breath during the chorus was either an approximation of lascivious heavy breathing, or a none-too-subtle reference to marijuana smoking. Much of Rubber Soul was recorded during The Beatles’ heaviest pot-smoking phase, and by late 1965 they had become adept at inserting drug references into their songs.
My main memory is that John wanted to hear the breathing, wanted it to be very intimate, so George Martin put a special compressor on the voice, then John dubbed it.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
The group’s fondness for innuendo extended to the middle section’s backing vocals, in which Lennon and McCartney repeatedly sang the word ‘tit’.
It was always amusing to see if we could get a naughty word on the record: ‘fish and finger pie’, ‘prick teaser’, ‘tit tit tit tit’. The Beach Boys had a song out where they’d done ‘la la la la’ and we loved the innocence of that and wanted to copy it, but not use the same phrase. So we were looking around for another phrase, so it was ‘dit dit dit dit’, which we decided to change in our waggishness to ‘tit tit tit tit’, which is virtually indistinguishable from ‘dit dit dit dit’. And it gave us a laugh.It was to get some light relief in the middle of this real big career that we were forging. If we could put in something that was a little bit subversive then we would. George Martin might say, ‘Was that “dit dit” or “tit tit” you were singing?’ ‘Oh, “dit dit”, George, but it does sound a bit like that, doesn’t it?’ Then we’d get in the car and break down laughing.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
After The Beatles split up Lennon claimed that ‘Girl’ was inspired in part by his feelings towards Christianity. In March 1966 the journalist Maureen Cleave conducted an interview in which Lennon asserted that the group were “more popular than Jesus now”, a remark which jeopardised The Beatles’ career in many countries.
While considerably more subtle, ‘Girl’ nonetheless betrays Lennon’s fascination with religion. He later told Rolling Stone that his opposition to the church was due to his upbringing.
I was just talking about Christianity in that – a thing like you have to be tortured to attain heaven. I’m only saying that I was talking about ‘pain will lead to pleasure’ in ‘Girl’ and that was sort of the Catholic Christian concept – be tortured and then it’ll be all right, which seems to be a bit true but not in their concept of it. But I didn’t believe in that, that you have to be tortured to attain anything, it just so happens that you were.
Rolling Stone, 1970
On 8 February 2011 the Love album went on sale on Apple Inc’s iTunes Store. Two bonus tracks were also made available: ‘Girl’ and ‘The Fool On The Hill’.
The remix of ‘Girl’ was the less adventurous of the two, but featured acoustic guitar from ‘And I Love Her’, drums from ‘Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite!’, and a tambura drone.
In the studio
‘Girl’ was recorded on the evening of 11 November 1965, on the final night of recording for Rubber Soul.
The rhythm track was completed in just two takes, with a number of overdubs then added. These included a fuzz guitar part played by George Harrison, which was left off during the mixing stage.
Both, Lennon and Harrison played acoustic guitars on the basic track. In addition, George overdubbed the acoustic 12-string (muted -though leaking – through the first two verses but remaining for the third verse).
George also sings backing vocals.
That’s true and it was also George and Paul who sang “tit-tit-tit” in the bridge. Even the “Rubber Soul” back cover confirms that Paul and George were on backing vocals to support John’s lead vocal.
The feelings I had when I heard “Girl” for the first time are seared into my memory. I was 16 and I remember John’s sexy, SHOCKING intake of breath into the microphone while singing about a girl he admired for being able to torture him in this bad relationship. All of “Rubber Soul” was the first time that complicated, adult relationships were offered to us by anybody, and who better than the Beatles-who always respected their audience- to do it.
Odd for me to read a comment like this because I *literally* grew up with this song and had for many years a child’s view of John not as a sexy music idol but more like an uncle I’d never met. “Sexy” is just not something I think when I hear John sing, no matter how much I love his voice, and I’ve heard this song so many times ever since I was a very little I’ve never given that breath much thought–it was just part of the song to me. The song’s very musical to me in a very charming, lovely way. It’s an old favorite of mine, but like many thing that you’ve had as part of your life that long, you get overly familiar with it and don’t think too much about certain details until someone else points them out to you.
When I first put on a Beatles record as a little girl (it happened to be Beatles for Sale), sexy was the first thing I thought when I heard John’s voice. I guess it didn’t hurt that my parents also had a Herman’s Hermits album lying around. He put all those 60’s teenybopper voices to shame. They just sounded like dorks in comparison.
Love this comment, Rachel. It really hits the spot ?
It’s a great comment. As Keith Richards has said many times, “Really it’s just us and the Beatles who really came out of that British Invasion thing.” (The Who came along a bit later.)
Rubber Soul is truly fantastic but I think “Girl” should have been thrown away or better still never recorded. The only and repeat only Beatles song I never liked. To me it just doesn’t fit in with any other music the Fab Four ever made. Sorry John !
Maybe because of the musical complexity of it? All those time signature and key changes? It certainly doesn’t sound like anything else of that era, and even today it’s probably too out there for some ears, particularly younger ones. It’s also one of the few Beatles songs I’ve never been able to settle on an arrangement of to do myself. It is hard work for a solo guitarist in the way most songs are not.
Yet you come here to comment on it.
All comments are important however strange they may seem
Girl is one of Beatles best compositions. It’s a masterpiece. A Lennon composition. McCartney composed the instrumental ending.
Shocking…seriously
After the last verse an unusual instrument can be heard as a solo (along with the 12 strings acoustic guitar middle strings), it`s like a greek instrument, but it might be a 12 strings acoustic again with a studio technic work, if somebody knows…
It´s not a greek instrument. It´s just a greek arrangment. Very simple, by the way, and it´s played with just two acosutic guitar. I never heard three guitars.
what is a greek arrangement?
Gyros are a greek arrangement.
and it is beautiul, one reason why i like this song. also and this may sound strange, the song reminds me of girls i have known in the past who were so pretty that guys followed them every where even if they didn’t care about them. the lyric/ she’s the kind of girl who puts you down when friends are there/ you feel a fool.
Hi Carlos, the instrument is called a bazouki. Interestingly enough there was a group from Greece during the 60s called “Trio Bel Canto”, who had a very western approach to greek music, and modeled their arrangements in similar fashion to the beatles who were their (and everyone else’s) biggest competition at the time.
Hello:
I sincerely wish to ask about the Beatles’ song called, “Girl”.
I am trying to find out the names of the bands that had played the latest or later versions of that song.
I remember that in the very early 1980’s and maybe before, I did hear that song on radio stations that plays only instrumental versions of that song, such as KJAX in 1980 (in Stockton, California).
I do really remember the instrumental versions of the Beatle’s song “Girl” played by bands that were not Beatles themselves–I was so fascinated and awestruck and would really love to hear such later instrumental version(s) of it.
Can you find out who are the major instrumental bands that played that song??
A quick search of Amazon produces all kinds of instrumental covers. Is there a particular style you’re looking for?
Allmusic.com is an excellent site that allows you to search any song and find virtually all the cover versions ever done of it. Many of the songs have samples you can listen to as well.
Listen really closely at about :58, it sounds like there is a chime or something in the background.
My opinion is that doesn`t matter what John may want to say about his inspiration for the lyrics, but definetely “the girl who came to stay” could not be anybody else but Cynthia, who being the mother of his child would be with him till death. And understanding that his “story” was “all about” her, well, that is. Can’t find another reason for her having to stay.
Read the article (Link Below)…
Paul McCartney has admitted to feeling “frustrated” that the murder of John Lennon in 1980 elevated him to the status of a “martyr” – meaning the rest of the Beatles were relegated to the background.
And he argues that the perception that Lennon led the band is usually supported by offsetting his best work against McCartney’s worst.
https://www.loudersound.com/news/beatles-paul-mccartney-frustration-john-lennon-legend
Isn’t there sitar in the background while they sing the chorus? I read somewhere there was sitar in this song, plus Norwegian wood.
Beautiful arrangement, soulful vocal, wonderful song, nice Greek style guitar passages.
I can relate to Paul’s lines about ‘A man must break his back to earn his day of leisure’ as I’m sure most men can…
These songs really stand the test of time…Just compare with some current tripe like ‘You Can Blow My Whistle Baby’…LOL, what have we become!?
That line you’re referring to is most likely John’s, not Paul’s. John more than once spoke of these lines as his own critic against the catholic church. Then Paul, after four decades of memory-manipulating pot smoking suddenly claims he wrote them. Who do you believe? I can’t see such clever writing coming from him anyway.
I don’t see a reason not to believe Paul.
If he says he added this “working like a slave for that woman” stuff, why should he lie?
Could you give us the excact John quote about this line, or what “lines” are you talking about?
And sorry, but your last sentence doesn’t sound as if you were much interested in the truth anyway because of a very clear bias against Paul.
I agree the last sentence sounds a bit harsh, i have no bias against Paul. I just don’t like it when the wrong guy gets the credit for someone else’s work, which i believe may have happened in this case. I don’t believe Paul’s been intensionally lying about it either. Pot smoking does that (manipulate) to your memory.
And here is why i believe this is what happened in this case(from wiki):
“According to McCartney, he contributed the lines “Was she told when she was young that pain would lead to pleasure” and “That a man must break his back to earn his day of leisure.”[2] However, in a 1970 interview with Rolling Stone, Lennon claimed that he came up with these lines as a comment on Christianity which he was “opposed to at the time”. He explained: “I was just talking about Christianity in that – a thing like you have to be tortured to attain heaven. […] – be tortured and then it’ll be alright, which seems to be a bit true but not in their concept of it. But I didn’t believe in that, that you have to be tortured to attain anything, it just so happens that you were.”[6]
Funny he didn’t mention that he didn’t actually write this himself then, don’t you think?
Done a bit research, and found that the first sentence in the wiki-quotation weren’t accurate. This is how he put it: “Girl I liked because I was, in a way, trying to say something or other about Christianity which I was opposed to at the time.”
https://web.archive.org/web/20100216123905/https://imaginepeace.com/archives/4385
I see no contradiction. John could well have come up with the idea of what he wanted to say, and Paul with the lyric. The song doesn’t say “was she told when she was young you have to be tortured to attain heaven”, does it?.
Either way, Paul said he wrote them, like “i came up with that”. If you’re right, he only phrased it. A significant difference.
Interesting that you chalk up Paul’s version to pot use yet eagerly accept John’s word, who was using acid heavily at the time. At the time of the interview he was still dropping acid and having his problems with heroin. Are you sure there’s no bias?
The problem, Vince, is that you DON’T KNOW if someone is taking credit for someone else’s work. You only assume it based on your own biases.
You weren’t there. Neither was I .
Stating your opinions as opinions is one thing; stating them as fact with wrong or non-existent “proof” is another.
Why must everything become a John v Paul debate? They most likely wrote this song together, with John having the bulk of lyrical and musical ideas and Paul helping out and fine-tuning. Also to suggest that Macca never writes clever lyrics is selling him extremely short.
See my answer above.
I want to know why it’s always called a ‘John v Paul debate’! I think in all fairness it should be called a ‘Paul v John debate’ – at least 50% of the time – I mean after all!
Girl’s melody, the part “when you say she’s looking good, she acts…” is very similar to “Young love”, a song from the early sixties (or late 50s?) that may have been known to the Beatles, given that it was later covered by Apple artist Mary Hopkin. This is a very fine recording as well, worth listening to. Anybody agrees?
Just listened to Sonny James perform that song, and the first thing I thought of was Girl by The Beatles. Absolutely they sound very similar!
Given John’s incredibly bad memory in 1970-71, given his flat-out lies (cf “How Do You Sleep?”), given that any number of independent sources have verified virtually all of Paul’s recollections, and given that a good many independent sources have flatly discredited John’s (cf Pete Shotton’s book, etc. etc. etc.), I am inclined to believe Paul.
A real McCartney fan, I see.
1:53, Right channel, what’s that?? sounds like a piano…
I think it’s one of the acoustic guitars mistakenly left in the mix.
Lennon´s Girl is a masterpiece. Typical Lennon is his sad melody, and the resolve in “…girl!…” In his letter number 148 in the book John Lennon´s letters, Lennon writes about his song Oh My Love: “The oriental sounding note in the “heart” bit is not Yoko´s influence–I need the same kind of “flats” in an old song I recorded with the Beatles “girl”!
i can hear an istrument like a kind of pianno or somethng like that back in the mix (at 01:54)
Great song . John Lennon of course wrote this with fine input by McCartney. I love Lennon’s much talked of ” pain will lead to pleasure” line. First hear this on “Love Songs”. I got the brilliant”Rubber Soul” album, which of course it was originally off.This is one of it’s many gems.
In The Beatles Complete: Guitar edition, the lyric goes: Was she told when she was young that FAME would lead to pleasure? And, listening to the song again, I think that’s correct.
That makes no sense. It’s obviously “pain”.
I always thought it was “fame” not “pain” as my older brother ridiculed my using the word “pain” as in sadomasochistic behaviour. But “fame” leading to “pleasure “ does make sense. This girl does what she can to make a name for herself and her “teasing “.
Thanks Jan for the correction. Anyway, a great song.
I have just checked, I was initially correct. John Lennon uses the word “pain” not”fame”. A long with Joe’s editorial and many others say so.
The editorial is of course quoting John Lennon himself from a 1970 Rolling Stone interview in referencing the word “pain”.
Often in published lyrics a few words are changed to preserve the copyright in some intellectual-property way. The old Hit Parader is a most unreliable source.
The article mentions the sharp intake of breath. I always heard it as sort of a sigh when listening to Rubber Soul on vinyl, like John was closing his eyes and wistfully thinking of her. I never thought of it as heavy breathing. Ever since the CD version came out, it is nothing but smoking a joint to me. It was probably the biggest difference I noticed between any of the vinyl vs. CD versions. Well, apart from the ILTY false start, maybe!
Classic Lennon love ballad, very beautiful. This song is the perfect tandem for Michelle, as bith songs are exotic and beautiful on my ears.
I’ve always believed the sharp intake of breath was a ‘core, look at her’ type of response. And this was a common expression at the time. The smoking a joint connotation makes no sense in the context of the lyrics.
Agreed. Sorry Peter Asher!
It could easily be about Mary Jane. A wistful ode to reefer. Beatles were high into it at the time, and Girl was a slang term for pot. The sharp inhale sounds like a deliberately planted taking of a toke. People of that generation still use girl as a reference widely. Mom talking about her 20-something son- ” I thought he was going to leave the girl behind after he graduated school, but she is still with (or bothering) him”. Mary Jane’s last dance, anyone?
i’m wondering if anyone can help me place the middle 8, “she’s the type of girl…” melody. it sounds very close to that of a girl group of the era. imagine 2 or 3 teenage girls singing in unison, perhaps a bit slower than in “girl”, sort of a “stroll” tempo, and it’s either the middle 8 or verse of their song. the melody is either lennon’s, or a 3rd above and climbing against it like a harmony, only extends beyond the “cool” with a few more descending notes.
The line “She’s the kind of girl who puts you down…” is fabulous, one of the best lyrics that John wrote.
She doesn’t sound like a very nice girl, does she?
No, but it fits, because Yoko wasn’t a very nice girl either.
I discovered “The Beatles Bible” quite by accident. I love Beatles songs that feature acoustic guitar. Being an acoustic guitar player, I perused some Beatles’ guitar tutorial sites on the internet. In one site, the instructor gave all of this great background information on the song, “Michelle” which he discovered on The Beatles Bible. I originally thought that this was a book! (I have been a daily visitor to The Beatles Bible once I discovered that it was an internet site.) Anyways, I checked out the instructor’s site, and he had an excellent lesson on the song, “Girl”. He put a capo on the 8th fret, and the sound was magical. You can tell that he loves The Beatles, and that he has great respect and awe for their beautiful, creative songs. One of the highlights of his tutorial was when he stressed the subtle transition from the Em chord to the Em7 chord and then to an Am. It’s just so beautiful and poignant and perfect. Its beautiful art! It’s The Beatles at their natural best. My appreciation of their music has no limit!
The guitar tutorial site is called: Shutup and Play. I have absolutely zero affiliation with the site other than the fact that I’m a huge fan of the fellow’s playing ability plus he’s an excellent, methodical teacher. He accurately teaches a number of Beatles’ songs which I thoroughly appreciate.
I don’t know if Joe will allow this plug, but I would never have heard about Joe’s excellent site had it not been for “Shutup and Play”.
Quite agree, Shut up and Play is an excellent site and he really nails a brilliant song.
The intake of breath through one’s teeth on this song is more like a sigh, indicating an impossible and perhaps fatal realization — like seeing a car wreck on the side of the road. Or the sound your mechanic makes before he tells you your car has a cracked block.
another exampe that Lennon’s melodies were every bit as intricate, complex and lovely as Paul’s, when he wanted them to be, on more tender material like this…the major difference is John’s stuff is usually more sad/tragic-sounding, Don’t u guys think this song is kind of criminally-underrated? It’s not nearly as well known as, say, Michelle, and I see no reason for that! IF Michelle is better, its not by much..
To me this song was playing on the radio the day my mother had a still birth baby girl.
I was six years old living in Cape Verde Islands. Did not know a word of English. The beat of the song matched my Pain. Yesterday My mom passed away, I revisited the song. I dedicate this song to two very special “girl” my mom and the sister i lost when I was six,
Thank You to the Beatles
For me “girl was and always is real.
I just happened across this brilliant website while looking for some information on this song.
I was playing My Gypsy Girl (Moye Tziganochki) sheet music from 8 notes when I thought the melody sounded familiar. Take a listen, it sounds like one of those classical crossover arrangements of a pop tune but is actually a Russian or Eastern European folk melody. https://www.8notes.com/scores/25982.asp
Back to praise for this site, I do not have the words to describe how fantastic it is. Growing up I had a lot of books about the Beatles but nothing comes close to this. Thank you very much for all of your hard work, it is very much appreciated.