On 31 January 1967, while The Beatles were in Sevenoaks, Kent, making a promotional film for ‘Strawberry Fields Forever’, John Lennon wandered in to an antique shop close to their hotel. There he bought a framed Victorian circus poster from 1843.
The poster announced Pablo Fanque’s Circus Royal, coming to Town Meadows in Rochdale. It grandly announced that the circus would be for the benefit of Mr Kite, and would feature “Mr J Henderson the celebrated somerset thrower” and Zanthus the horse.
Lennon set the words to music, which became ‘Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite!’, which closed the first half of Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band.
Mr Kite was William Kite, a performer and the son of circus owner James Kite. In 1810 he had founded Kite’s Pavilion Circus and later moved to Wells’ Circus. It is thought that he worked in Pablo Fanques’ fair between 1843 and 1845. Fanque was Britain’s first black circus owner. He was born William Darby in Norwich in 1796.
Lennon hung the poster in his music room at his home in Weybridge, and began to use it as inspiration for a song. Some of the facts he changed – the circus was coming to Bishopsgate rather than Rochdale; the horse became Henry; the circus became a fair; Mr Kite was ‘late of Wells’s Circus’ rather that of Pablo Fanque (pictured below); and Mr Henderson, rather than Mr Kite, promised to challenge the world.
Minor changes aside, the words of the poster found their way almost unchanged into ‘Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite!’, which closed the first half of The Beatles’ Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. Lennon sat at his piano and sang phrases from the poster until he had the song, possibly with help from Paul McCartney.
Lennon was later dismissive of the song, as revealed in a range of interview snippets collated in the Anthology book.
I wrote that as a pure poetic job, to write a song sitting there. I had to write because it was time to write. And I had to write it quick because otherwise I wouldn’t have been on the album. So I had to knock off a few songs. I knocked off ‘A Day In The Life’, or my section of it, and whatever we were talking about, ‘Mr Kite’, or something like that. I was very paranoid in those days, I could hardly move.
Lennon Remembers, Jann S Wenner
He also denied there were hidden drug references in the song.
The whole song is from a Victorian poster, which I bought in a junk shop. It is so cosmically beautiful. It’s a poster for a fair that must have happened in the 1800s. Everything in the song is from that poster, except the horse wasn’t called Henry. Now, there were all kinds of stories about Henry the Horse being heroin. I had never seen heroin in that period. No, it’s all just from that poster. The song is pure, like a painting, a pure watercolour.
All We Are Saying, David Sheff
Paul McCartney added ‘Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite!’ to the setlist of his Out There tour in 2013. In a July 2013 interview with Rolling Stone he said he had co-written the song with Lennon.
‘Mr Kite!’ is such a crazy, oddball song that I thought it would freshen up the set. Plus the fact that I’d never done it. None of us in the Beatles ever did that song [in concert]. And I have great memories of writing it with John. I read, occasionally, people say, ‘Oh, John wrote that one.’ I say, ‘Wait a minute, what was that afternoon I spent with him, then, looking at this poster?’ He happened to have a poster in his living room at home. I was out at his house, and we just got this idea, because the poster said ‘Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite!’ – and then we put in, you know, ‘there will be a show tonight,’ and then it was like, ‘of course,’ then it had ‘Henry the Horse dances the waltz.’ You know, whatever. ‘The Hendersons, Pablo Fanques, somersets…’ We said, ‘What was ‘somersets’? It must have been an old-fashioned way of saying somersaults. The song just wrote itself. So, yeah, I was happy to kind of reclaim it as partially mine.
Rolling Stone
The most psychedelic song of this album.
I’ve always thought this too! The circus-ish sounds and parts in this song is so much like a floating acid trip.
It’s kind of sad that John felt this song was a throwaway. I think we all love it dearly!
John felt that many songs of him were throwaways, when i read those articles i felt so sad because i like those beautiful songs but he hates them jaja it’s weird.
It is always sad to hear John undermine songs (his own and those by the others) with his cynical, often negative recollections of them. I understand the man had “issues” but it is kind of a slap in the face of fans who enjoy and/or praise the songs to have the author come in after-the-fact as simply dismiss it as garbage. Sadder, for me, was George’s minimal role on Sgt. Pepper. On Mr. Kite Harrison “only” plays harmonica? Why did he even bother to show up for the session if that’s all they are going to use him for? George had already proven himself a superb guitarist and was growing as a songwriter by ’67, yet he seemingly “regressed” on Sgt. Pepper. I know some of it was his own doing, prefering to obsess about India and sitars and such. But he was still a Beatle, and was obviously present for these sessions, yet he’s not vocally present on this song (or most of the others), his guitar is absent but they found some role as a harmonica-player for a rock superstar? Disappointing to say the least. They even cast aside his Only A Northern Song (which IMO was worthy of inclusion on Pepper WITH George’s other song Within You Without You). Mr. Kite is a nice, fittingly psychedelic song that helped keep Pepper from being an overwhelmingly McCartney project. More John and George would have made Pepper better (it is NOT my favorite Beatle LP and IMO the praise lavished on it is more appropriate for Revolver and Abbey Road).
Where exactly would a guitar solo fit in with this song? John just meant that it was a throwaway, not that he thought it sucked. He just had a different and more blunt way of putting things. It isn’t an overly great song, it’s a little boring and John sounds bored. The bass is nice and the words are interesting, but certainly not among John’s finer work.
I think he was doing that to protect himself from the world, like you like it? Great. You don’t like it? I don’t give a f**k, i’m not saying it as a fact, I just think that he lacked feeling safe in his life, he always had a answer to put an attack down.
The middle section with this weird piano is one of the best things he’s done, it’s cosmic, literally from different universe.
Has the poster survived?
I wouldn’t make too much of the fact George’s involvement was minimal. How many songs by the other two included contributions from the rest, instrumental and/or vocal? Yesterday, Eleanor Rigby, Blackbird, Julia. Heck, George didn’t even play lead on two of his best songs: While My Guitar Gently Weeps and Taxman.
Neither would I.
Paul only played the guitar solo on “Taxman” as well as bass, not the primary guitar parts, and it’s possible, although I can’t confirm, that George may have overdubbed some lead breaks on WMGGW.
It’s true George was preoccupied with thoughts of India and Hinduism, and why not? It’s no small thing to find God, in whatever flavor you prefer.
George did not have minimal involvement with “Sgt. Pepper” – he was present on practically every song and don’t forget, he wasn’t just branching out into Indian music, but also taking up the organ. He did not stop playing the guitar altogether during that period.
One of the best songs I ever heard. The entire album is incredible.
Great site. I’ve been reading for hours.
However, “hanged” as in “Lennon hanged the poster in his music room” should be “hung” as described below. (Yes, as well as being a Beatles fan I’m a pedant. Please forgive me.)
“Hanged, as a past tense and a past participle of hang, is used in the sense of “to put to death by hanging,” as in Frontier courts hanged many a prisoner after a summary trial. A majority of the Usage Panel objects to hung used in this sense. In all other senses of the word, hung is the preferred form as past tense and past participle, as in I hung my child’s picture above my desk.
(The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, 2000)
Thanks Ron. That’s a weak spot in my grammar. I’ve fixed the article now though. Glad you like the site!
from the Steve Turner book, “A Hard Day’s Write”:
At the time, John saw ‘Being For The Benefit Of Mr, Kite!’ as a throwaway, telling Hunter Davies, “I wasn’t proud of that. There was no real work. I was just going through the motions because we needed a new song for Sgt. Pepper at that moment.” By 1980, he had radically revised his opinion. He told Playboy interviewer David Sheff: “It’s so cosmically beautiful… The song is pure, like a painting, a pure watercolour.”
I think what John told Playboy was in reference to the different soundscapes in the song.
As a songwriter, he’s entitled to do that. I change my opinions of my own creations.
In the 1970 Rolling Stone interview John frequently expresses resentment at the fact that by Sgt. Pepper, Paul had become the catalyst of the band, so he (John) had to come up with songs just to sorta keep up, even though he wasn’t feeling particularly motivated (he seems to have been in a depression). So that might be part of the reason he wasn’t overly fond of “Mr. Kite” at the time.
This song has the greatest bassline I have ever heard. McCartney was on fire during this album.John was so wrong to dismiss this as garbage.
Funnily enough, i am a pedant too and i thought i would share this with you.
nit·pick
To be concerned with or find fault with insignificant details.
nit’pick’er
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
yes, it’s an amazing bassline. isn’t it?
Oh heck…John thought all of his Beatle songs were “throw aways”…while his post-Beatle stuff were mainly “throw aways”.
Lennon was a great Beatle songwriter/singer (my favorite)…I would have hoped that had he lived he would have gotten rid of his bitterness and come down off his high horse to enjoy life a little…but we’ll never know.
In the 1980 Playboy interview one can read that John had changed his attitude concerning this song for the better.
His songs on Double Fantasy showed that he had mellowed some.
Why didn’t you give the credits for the tape loops to Martin, Emerick and John himself?
About the reeds, John play one organ and Martin another one and harmonium, but Mal didn’t play one.
I’m not sure if the glockenspiel were used at all. It was at the studio, but not included.
Also, there’s a piano on this one. Who played it?
There’re photographs of this sessions with John, George and someone else playing harmonicas. So, it’s most likely John played too, in fact, he was the “official beatle” harmonica player.
The piano was played by George Martin. I agree the glockenspiel probably wasn’t used, so I’ve removed it from the listing. Lennon didn’t play harmonica on this though – it was Harrison, Starr, Aspinall and Evans.
Right now I’m reading Geoff Emerick book, and he said a glockenspiel was recorded (half speed), but he didn’t mention who played it.
Then, what I always thought about harmonicas seen pictures from those sessions: “a chorus of bass harmonicas (played by John, G. Harrison, Mal, and Neil).”
George Martin was clearly the fifth Beatle and was every bit as important as the other four and this song is evidence of that! To take an idea from the imagination of John Lennon and actually translate it was very impressive.
At about 1:10 through the song you can clearly hear an electric guitar. I think George played it.
Yes definitely a sound of guitar. Very strange but awesome sound
Possibly my favorite Beatles song. Incredibly well done. Unbelieveable almost. What a sound. And on a 4-track. Lennon was dismissive of a lot of stuff. I’m guessing it was one way of dealing with being somewhat overwhelmed. He came to appreciate the song anyway.
He went through his primal scream period, during which he believed that all art had to be self referential and brutally honest. It was this frame of reference that made him dismissive of songs that were pure flights of fancy and touched no part of his own inner world as he saw it.
He was wrong on a couple of levels and I think was coming round to a more rounded and balanced view before he died.
There is clearly a LOT of work in this song. Maybe sour grapes from Lennon
Regarding John’s comments about his music, I don’t know how old most you all are – I’m 53 and lived through these periods – I think one ought to remember that John’s comments in 1970 are the comments of a 30 year-old on his work when he was in his 20’s. His 1980 interviews are the words of a 40 year old looking back.
We can be sure that had he lived to his 50’s and beyond, his view of his music etc., would have become much more circumspect.
Our view and portrait of John remains frozen in time.
I’m only 52 so I’ll defer to your greater experience. Yes I totally agree that’s very easy to forget how young they were when they produced all this music that still keeps us stimulated more than 40 years later.
well Charlie, next year you’ll fully understand my point – at 53 all the wisdom of the world is revealed!
Charlie and Robert are exactly right about Lennon. His harsh assessment and bitterness about his bandmates was fading by the time he died. He was a lot happier in his personal life. Had he lived, I think he would have collaborated with Paul again sometime in the 1980s or early 1990s. Time really does heal all wounds.
I have a question.
You’ve written that Paul play an (Acoustic) guitar solo in this song. But I cannot hear a guitar at all. Can you tell me where it is the most hearable?
You did not credit Paul for vocals, and you can clearly hear him do harmonies in the last part of each verse, I think you can hear George Harrison too.
Burn what you once adored. This is a kind of rebirth John might have crossed as the ever questioning man he was (sigh…)
But I believe he initially was very proud of Mr Kite!
This is a musical collage masterpiece. A pure form of modern art. John being jealous about Paul’s ability in this domain (Paul first intended to work on collages) certainly pushed it to test this sort of artistic expression onto a Beatle song. This is the former Number 9, fitting totally with Sgt Pepper’s spirit. A very clever choice for a leftover, Mr Lennon.
Congrats for your site, this is a goldmine 🙂
Actually, years later John changed his thoughts on this being a throwaway song. I think it was an interview with Playboy where he described it as cosmic or something similar. I have always loved this song. It was just John the artist being hard on himself, not realizing the great song we still enjoy hearing.
This is a remarkable song. George Martin and Geoff Emericks’ contribution can’t be understated. One of my favorite Beatle songs. From what I have read, Lennon was in a bit of an acid funk late 66-67 leaving him feeling bored and depressed. Too much of a good thing. He wrote some beautiful songs during this period and Mr Kite is a great example. Thanks for this website. It’s a wealth of information.
According to Paul McCartney from a rolling stone interview:
“And I have great memories of writing it with John. I read, occasionally, people say, “Oh, John wrote that one.” I say, “Wait a minute, what was that afternoon I spent with him, then, looking at this poster?” He happened to have a poster in his living room at home. I was out at his house, and we just got this idea, because the poster said “Being for the Benefit of Mr Kite” – and then we put in, you know, “there will be a show tonight,” and then it was like, “of course,” then it had “Henry the Horse dances the waltz.” You know, whatever. “The Hendersons, Pablo Fanques, somersets…” We said, “What was ‘somersets’? It must have been an old-fashioned way of saying somersaults.” The song just wrote itself. So, yeah, I was happy to kind of reclaim it as partially mine.”
Link: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/qa-paul-mccartney-looks-back-on-his-latest-magical-mystery-tour-184406/
Joe, you might want to add Paul’s comments on the song from Many Years from Now, since the Rolling Stone interview was not the first time he’d mentioned cowriting it. I don’t have time to type up the paragraph at the moment, but it’s at pp 317-318 in the first edition.
Hello, good people….
It’s very sad when we know that John felt some songs he made was a throwaway. But remember this my friends:
He only begun to think that way AFTER Yoko has melted his very brain with heroine…..what a bad ass woman!!!
this is the remarkable song. George Martin ALONG WITH Geoff Emericks’ contribution can’t end up being understated. solitary connected with OUR favorite Beatle songs. by what my partner and i have read, Lennon am throughout a good bit of a acid funk late 66-67 leaving him feeling bored IN ADDITION TO depressed. Too much of an good thing. He composed a series of beautiful songs through this period AND ALSO Mr Kite is really a great example. Thanks on this website. It’s an wealth involving information.
Mr Kite…what a great piece of creativity! I’m curious as to the snippets of fairground organ recordings that were randomly pieced together to create the circus ambience. Does anyone know specifically what instruments were recorded and where? I’m guessing they were the large classic European fairground organs like Gavioli, Marenghi, Ruth etc. Some of them had glockenspiels so perhaps George Martin wanted to layer a glock to bring that out in the song.
Incredible song.
Then I go the political route thinking Mr K is Kruschev, Hendersons are Kennedys. So glad I found this site.
The melody is falling, very typically Lennon. McCartney always — after Lennon´s death – exaggerates his own importance; they wrote it “together”, meaning McCartney contributed with some words, and the melody just “wrote itself”.
Spot on about McCartney. He never gives anyone credit re THEIR contributions. But Lennon was also dismissive of Martin
Once again, all one can to is yawn and move on. Your ridiculously biased, non-factual posts are really not worth the time.
Philip Norman, author of the book Shout, said in a 1980’s interview that the only person you can go to for Beatles accuracy is George Harrison. He said you can’t go to Paul McCartney because he re-writes history. And this quote was 35+ years ago and the video of him saying it is on YouTube. So when it comes to ‘who wrote what’ there is more to this story than fans blindly choosing John over Paul. Yawn to YOUR non-factual bias.
My husband and I have just just been to Liverpool on holiday and did The Magical Mystery Tour and saw John Lennon’s homes and Sir Paul Mc Cartney’s and Ringo’s and George’s and stopped off at Strawberry Fields and Penny Lane and took photos, and the sense of history was fantastic, and I felt such a connection with the songs penned about the area.
We visited the Cavern several times and heard a sound alike who was John Lennon in all but reality. It was like stepping back in time and we were in the 60’s again !
Tributes were left to the Immortal Cilla Black outside the Cavern in Mathew St—- not the original Cavern which is situated a few yards along Mathew St.
I picked up some leaves from outside Strawberry Fields and I shall frame them.
We saw the Barbers shop and the fire station along Penny Lane, and the bank too.
Was told Yoko Ono bought her husband’s first home for half a million pounds, but I believe she donated it to The National Trust along with his other home — I may not be correct in this, so it may need to be checked.
Loved the trip and so did my husband
Jo Sparkes
Dereham Norfolk UK
Easily overlooked in all the attention that the words and production of this song attract, are the seamless (and therefore easily overlooked) key modulations in this song. Each verse begins in C minor but modulates up to D minor for the second half. After the second verse, instead of modulating back down to C minor, they stay in D minor. Thus, the instrumental break begins in D minor and modulates up to E minor (also changing time signature to 3/4). With the big piano chord (G major), they move back to C minor to get into the 3rd verse. The ending repeats the tonal centers of the middle section (D minor and E minor), but remaining in 4/4. Quite an astounding little piece, I think.
Great way to end side one of “Sgt Pepper”. Loved this song when I first heard it, the sound effects are amazing. George Martin and Geoff Emerick do deserve a lot of credit. Legendary how John Lennon saw the poster and got the idea for the song.
Why must John put down songs I love?
I believe that the original poster now hangs in Julian Lennon’s residence.
Recorded 50 years ago today! Pretty sure that’s the guitar solo at 1:16- 1:26 (played by Paul…what a surprise). How he got THAT sound out of an electric guitar I have no idea. And is that ADT on John’s voice? It’s definitely not double-tracked but really full for being just one track.
I have a very well-done reproduction of that poster in my music room. Love the song even if John didn’t.
Although it seems plausible that Paul helped out with the writing, I have to think of it as mainly John’s song. That seems to be how George Martin remembered it too, as evidenced by the quote about John’s vague arranging ideas, suggesting that in the studio it was treated as mainly John’s song.
I heard this song again today and listened all the way to the end. I couldn’t help but notice how the song moved into the music of “She’s So Heavy”, yet i have never seen anything written about this. Has anyone else noticed this?
You don’t usually listen to songs right until the end?
And I hear no similarities,
One of my all time favorite songs. I was mesmerized by it when I was a child. There’s a sinister undertone in it that frightened and fascinated me. Still does! Pure genius.
It’s a classic and beauty song, to me. The sound is wonderful.
When Crawdaddy asked Lennon in 1972 who wrote BEING FOR THE BENEFIT OF MR. KITE, Lennon said “Me. I got some of the words off an old circus poster. I have it in the billiard room.”
No mention of McCartney helping with the writing.
I’m of the belief that Lennon probably played the main harmonium part on the basic track; it seems too sloppy at points to have been Martin, and why wouldn’t he play the main chord-based part in his own song? It’s not like John had never played harmonium before; he even played it in the promo video for We Can Work It Out. Where is the evidence that Martin played the part?
That’s a good question about the harmonium parts. If there was a second harmonium part, it could’ve been George Martin possibly overdubbing it.
Another credit that needs to be added to the personnel is John’s harmonica – both he and George were photographed overdubbing harmonica parts.
This song is on my Halloween playlist because of the creepy circus vibes. I can imagine it playing during a haunted carnival scene