Linda McCartney was a photographer, musician and animal rights activist. She met Paul McCartney in London in 1967; they married in 1969, remaining together until her death in 1998.
She was born Linda Louise Eastman on 24 September 1941 in New York City. She had one brother and two sisters, and was raised in the wealthy Scarsdale area of Westchester County, New York.
Her father, Lee Eastman, a showbusiness laywer, had changed his name from Leopold Vail Epstein. He was the attorney of songwriter Jack Lawrence. Her mother Louise Sara Lindner Eastman, the heiress to the Lindner department store fortune, died in an air accident in 1962.
I remember when I first met John Eastman, I asked him, ‘What do you want to do? What’s your ambition in life?’ He said, ‘To be the president of the United States of America,’ which fairly soon after that he didn’t want to do. They were very preppy. Very aspirational.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
Linda Eastman studied fine art and history at the University of Arizona. She married John Melvin See Jr in June 1962; their daughter Heather Louise was born on 31 December that year. The couple divorced in June 1965 – she later described See as a “nice man, a geologist, an Ernest Hemingway type”.
Two months later, Eastman saw The Beatles perform at their historic first Shea Stadium show on 15 August 1965.
As she was a real music fan she was quite pissed off with everyone screaming. I think she enjoyed the experience but she genuinely wanted to hear the show. That wasn’t the deal, though. Not then.
Anthology
She was introduced to photography by Hazel Archer, a teacher in Arizona, who gave her some simple advice: “Borrow a camera, get a roll of film and take pictures.” Her first published pictures appeared in Spotlight, the UK actors’ directory, after she was invited to accompany a journalist friend to a Shakespeare season by the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art.
In 1965 she returned to New York, working for a time as a receptionist at Town And Country magazine. It was here that she chanced upon an invitation to join The Rolling Stones’ press launch for Aftermath, due to take place on a yacht on New York’s Hudson River on 24 June 1966. Linda managed to talk her way onto the boat, becoming the only photographer present.
The resulting images were in high demand, and appeared in a number of publications. She left Town And Country to become a professional photographer, often taking pictures of musicians onstage and off-duty, often in Central Park and in New York venues such as Fillmore East.
She took images of artists including Aretha Franklin, Jimi Hendrix, Bob Dylan, Janis Joplin, Eric Clapton, The Who and The Doors. Her portrait of Eric Clapton taken on the front cover of the 11 May 1968 issue of Rolling Stone magazine was the first by a woman. her photographs have been displayed in more than 50 exhibitions worldwide, including the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. In 1992 a book, Sixties: Portrait Of An Era, was published.
Photography made me a different person because it was something I loved doing and just nothing else mattered. I could just take my camera and go, probably like Diane Arbus felt when she was taking pictures. I had that feeling. Even though I had a child I still felt single. It’s different when you’re married and you’ve got to go cook dinner. I could just go, go anywhere.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
Linda Eastman met Paul McCartney at the Bag O’Nails club in London on 15 May 1967.
She was in town photographing groups for a book called Rock And Other Four Letter Words. She’d been sent from America, and she’d just done a session with The Animals. They’d come over to the club: ‘Let’s go out and have a bevvie and a smoke.’So she was sitting in an alcove near the band, which was Georgie Fame and the Blue Flames – with Speedy Acquaye on bongos. They were always a big favourite of mine. I saw her and thought, ‘Hello…’ When she was about to leave the club, I stood up and said, ‘Hello, we haven’t met’ – which was a straight pull.
Then I said, ‘We’re going on to this next club called the Speakeasy. Do you want to come?’ And if she’d said ‘no’ I wouldn’t have ended up marrying her. She said, ‘Yeah, all right.’ So we went on to the Speakeasy, and it was the first time any of us had ever heard A Whiter Shade Of Pale. We all thought it was Stevie Winwood. It turned out to be the group with a very strange name – Procol Harum.
That was the first time we ever met – and then we met on and off, because I would see her if I went to New York or if she was in London.
Anthology
They met again four days later at Brian Epstein’s house in Belgravia, London, at the launch party for Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. After her photographic assignments were complete she flew back to the US.
Their paths crossed once more in New York in May 1968, following The Beatles’ return from India. McCartney and John Lennon were in the city to announce the formation of Apple Corps, carrying out a succession of interviews for the press and an appearance on NBC-TV’s The Tonight Show.
In May, John and I went to New York to announce that Apple was starting: ‘Send us your huddled talent.’ We wanted a grand launch, but I had a strange feeling and I was very nervous. I had a real personal paranoia. I don’t know if it was what I was smoking at the time, but it was very strange for me.I remember sitting up there and being interviewed. John was wearing a bus driver’s or a prefect’s badge, and he was doing well. Linda was there taking photos, and afterwards I said, ‘Couldn’t you tell I was nervous?’ but she said it was fine.
Anthology
Wonderful wonderful woman. Such a shame they didn’t catch the cancer in time. She and Paul would’ve been together forever.
She has become a rather saintly figure since her death, in contrast to all the negative reactions she attracted when she replaced the popular Jane Asher and when she was playing and singing with Wings.
Linda won a Grammy award in 1974 with Paul and Denny Laine for Band on the run as best vocal group. She had the last laugh on the naysayers!
Yes, that’s true and I think probably because the regular press, the rock press and the fans were so hateful about her. The Brit tabloids regularly called her a “JAP” which stood for Jewish American Princess, racist and sexist stuff they probably wouldn’t get away with today.
Sweet lady
People who didn’t know Linda mistook her shyness as being aloof. I wish I’d known her personally. We were born the same year. How proud she would of the way her brew turned out. My my, Mary is a fine photographer. Paul kept the family close. I love the McCartneys!
Linda was a lovely housewife she and Paul who raised their four kids although I met only son James in person here in Seattle up in Fremont at the High Dive Bar for his big gig it was back in May 19th at 8pm as I do recall he was only one himself since he didn’t have any fellow musicians at the time while James was in town. It was fun I enjoy it. I m an Beatles fan today too.
To get up on the stage with little musical talent and to give countless promotional interviews I doubt that Linda was that shy. While I don’t agree that she, or anyone for that matter, should be villified Linda wasn’t beyond criticism either. Since her death, she and her marriage have been idealised beyond belief. Many women in music, then and now, worked hard at their careers in the predominantly male world of rock music, and often awarded much less recognition compared to their male peers. Yet Linda was catapulted right up there for being married to a Beatle and recruited to his band. If Paul had married a fellow musician I could understand if he wanted to take a different direction, but I found Linda audacious in thinking that it just wouldn’t matter to the legions of Beatles’ fans at the time. As for their personal relationship, if they were so enamoured of each other they should have waltzed off together into the sunset after meeting at the Bag O’Nails. Their subsequent sneaky hookups would have saved a lot of grief all round.
Oh boy!!!
I actually agree with you. I was a fan when I was a teen but if Linda hadn’t met Paul, would she had retrospectives on her and gallery openings of her work? I do agree she was a pioneer though, being the 1st woman and person to have their photo on the front page of RS.
Paul was engaged to Jane Asher when he and Linda had their “dirty weekend” in LA in June, 1968 — the weekend that’s treated so rhapsodically in print and film. And he still came home to Francie Schwartz, with whom Jane found him in bed. Paul was with Francie when they saw Jane in TV a few weeks later breaking the news that the engagement was off. Paul reportedly was surprised. WTF, Paul?
I’m glad it worked out for him and Linda, but it certainly appears he treated Jane shabbily. And that comment about Linda being a woman while all the others were girls is also insulting to Jane, who had an adult career the whole time she was with Paul.
Linda was absolutely the right woman for Paul, because they really did love each other, they were married for 29 years and she was so multitalented in her own right: she was a photographer, a very skilled cook, a loving and supportive wife, a loving mother to four children, animal rights activist, an entrepreneur who founded her own line of frozen vegetarian foods, vegetarian cookbook author and she was also a member of Wings.
It’s just disgraceful that she was unfairly vilified by teenage fans when she married Paul and I just don’t get why all the teenage girls were upset – it was Paul’s choice whom he wanted to marry.
Linda also sometimes came to The Beatles’ recording sessions, mostly for the purpose of taking photographs, and she also took her own personal photographs on the day of the iconic Abbey Road cover photo shoot – the photographer employed on that day was Scottish photographer Iain Macmillan. As far as I know, John, Ringo and George didn’t object to Linda being at the recording sessions at EMI, Trident or Olympic.
In direct contrast to his years with Jane Asher, Paul never once pressurized Linda to quit photography altogether, because as I said, she took her own photographs at recording sessions and she did some of his album covers as well as Wings. Linda was previously a professional photographer and she even photographed Tim Buckley, Buffalo Springfield, Neil Young, The Doors, The Rolling Stones, Arlo Guthrie, Jimi Hendrix and many others.
When Paul got married, it was the media that pushed the myth of thousands of heartbroken teenage girls around the world crying their eyes out. That is just not true. The vast majority reacted no differently from fans of the other Beatles to their marriages. Most felt neither one way or the other towards Linda
but, as usual, a minority of jealous fans ended up getting the publicity. Paul may have been popular, but that doesn’t warrant John, George, and Ringo’s fans being pushed as thoughtful, smart young people and Paul’s all empty-headed 13-year-old screamers. It’s a crude stereotype and not only a diss to Paul but to his fans. It’s interesting to see the footage of Paul and Linda’s wedding though. The surge of people they appear to be fending off are mainly guys from the press and photographers. Only a handful of teenage girls are present and there are a couple of crying girls with a small child in a pram who were filmed over and over again.
Thank you for your feedback and a few minor corrections to my post. You’re right about the wedding footage – it was mainly photographers and the press who were there in cartloads, not crying teenage girls.
Here’s some more trivia about Linda: she was friends with American singer-songwriter Carly Simon, who was married to fellow singer-songwriter James Taylor from 1972 to 1983.
On James’s 1974 album “Walking Man”, Paul, Linda and Carly all sang backing vocals on “Rock and Roll is Music Now” and “Let it all Fall Down”.
I’m so very glad that I saw her playing live with Wings once and solo with Paul twice. I loved her photos, her activities with animal rights and environmentalism. I was sad to get on a different Jane thread and read all of the Linda insults from some there. Linda in a few early wings concerts was a big cheerleader of the audience. She’s my favorite Beatle wife/girlfriend and Olivia is my second favorite as she clobbered the attacker with a heavy lamp and spoke out against the sleazy author Gulliano in defense not just of George which would be expected but also went out of her way to defend Paul because Gulliano insulted him repeatedly in books.
Linda was an amazing , talented, beautiful, intelligent and compassionate woman. Truly, truly wish she was still around in person. Such a tragic and iconic loss. Her legacy lives on as she was remarkable,. Truly a great woman . I wish I had known her personally.
It is said she died at the ranch in Arizona. I moved to Arizona last year so I was curious about the ranch, where it’s located and all that. Apparently, it’s in a very remote area at the foothills of the Rincon mountains, northeast of Tucson and was accessible only by helicopter. I learned they frequented their ranch yearly for 19 years… I didn’t know they came here that often! There’s a road off Interstate 10 between Phoenix and Tucson called McCartney Road, and it may well have been named after Paul, but it’s not particularly close to the ranch location. There’s also a street in Tucson called Starr Boulevard (or something like that). Go figure!
Linda McCartney was an interesting woman. I’ve read so opinions on whether or not she was the “right” woman for Paul to marry. Here’s my take on it:
I think Paul would have married Jane Asher if she hadn’t (wisely) broken it off with him. I say “wisely” because, after their marriage, he would have increased his efforts to make Jane to give up her acting career, bear and raise their children, and look after him. Jane wasn’t willing to do as Paul wished at that point in her life, so she took the initiative to end an untenable situation. Finding him in bed with another woman (if that happened) might have been the final breaking point for her, but not the sole reason for her decision to end the relationship. I admire Jane’s resolve in making the excruciating decision to end it with the man who was her first big love, her first lover, and someone she apparently still deeply loved.
By all accounts, Paul was deeply affected by Jane’s departure. This may have been partly due to injured ego but, I believe, mostly because he lost the woman who was so special to him. Also at this time, John was wrapped up closely with Yoko, causing Paul to largely lose his best mate and close artistic partner; Brian Epstein had died, leaving the Beatles without his familiar, protective presence; and the Beatles themselves were begin to disintegrate. All in all, this would have been an extremely unsettling time for Paul.
And then in 1968, Paul renewed his acquaintance with Linda. Her obvious interest in Paul and his welfare must have been a very soothing balm to such a distressed man. I’ve no doubt Linda comforted Paul, boosted his spirits, and stimulated his attraction when she let him know she would gladly devote her life to him, their children, and their home life, above anything else. Linda was, essentially, the right woman in the right place at the right time. Several years earlier, Paul might not have been prepared for marriage and children. But in 1968, he was ready.
Many have said that Linda was out to “catch a Beatle” and was primarily interested in Paul’s fame and fortune. Perhaps this was partly true, perhaps not. However, there are few women that could have resisted Paul’s immense charm, intelligence, sense of humor, sensitivity, and soft wooing ways. I’m sure he could have made any woman feel like she was the only female on earth! Also, he was physically very beautiful in his youth, and his music was absolutely enchanting. And that voice … ! The question should be — how could any woman *not* fall for Paul?
So they married, had children, and built a life together for many years. The details of that subject belong in another post.
Did Paul completely get over Jane? Certainly at the very least, she must remain in Paul’s memory as an extraordinarily special part of his youthful life. The dream girl he lost.
Jane did eventually marry, become a stay-at-home mother and wife for 15 years, and turn out a series of domestic-oriented books. She became just what Paul had wanted. With a little more patience and time on his part, he could have attained the life he desired with Jane.
All in all, Paul was fortunate to have these two women in his life — who loved Paul the man, not Paul the Beatle. I wish him ongoing happiness with his wife Nancy.