12.24pm
19 September 2010
5.48pm
1 May 2010
Speaking of Yoko, after reading Paul's bio (His Life? I don't remember the name, darn it) about how they dealed with their girlfriends/wives (Paul cheated on Jane Asher, John on Cynthia) to avoid breaking up directly, I wonder.
Did John use Yoko to break up the Beatles? I mean, it's a fact that John considered himself the Beatles's boss. If he was tired of the Beatles, didn't he use Yoko to make the other guys get sick of him?
(Note to herself : Side effect of having coffee and chocolate mix : Weird Beatle theories. )
Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie……
Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower…
Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go.
Beware of Darkness…
8.05pm
19 September 2010
Mith, It's called Paul McCartney : A Life. I agree, but I think John still would have left at some point.
*9*
As if it matters how a man falls down.'
'When the fall's all that's left, it matters a great deal.
10.24pm
14 December 2009
That's an interesting viewpoint, I've never thought of that – John hoping to break up the band in a kind of passive-aggressive way. Me, I like to imagine that he was hoping he could have it both ways: that he genuinely felt that Yoko could make a real contribution, that he could try and turn the others on to some of her avant-garde ideas that he was obsessed with at the time, thereby reviving his own interest in the band while keeping the others satisfied too.
Paul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
11.36pm
1 May 2010
Right, I think you nailed it Von. And once he saw that the others weren't so interested in following him down that avant garde path, he certainly tried to get out because the others were inhibiting his creativity by not going with some of those ideas. I don't think he intentionally used Yoko to get out of the band, but she was the main reason he left. He was quoted a few times in some of his last interviews that he had two creative partners, Paul and Yoko, and he had just moved on from him to her.
I sat on a rug, biding my time, drinking her wine
11.54pm
1 May 2010
Von Bontee said:
That's an interesting viewpoint, I've never thought of that – John hoping to break up the band in a kind of passive-aggressive way. Me, I like to imagine that he was hoping he could have it both ways: that he genuinely felt that Yoko could make a real contribution, that he could try and turn the others on to some of her avant-garde ideas that he was obsessed with at the time, thereby reviving his own interest in the band while keeping the others satisfied too.
Now I have never thought of it that way…. interesting…
Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie……
Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower…
Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go.
Beware of Darkness…
11.57pm
19 September 2010
The End of Lennon-McCartney was inevitable, even without Yoko. John would have found someone else.
As if it matters how a man falls down.'
'When the fall's all that's left, it matters a great deal.
5.11pm
1 December 2009
Oh that's true, no doubt. But maybe they could've kept it going longer than a couple of years.
As it is though, the fact that the breakup was right at the turn of the decade it makes for a nice end-of-an-era summing-up.
GEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
7.29pm
19 September 2010
4.03pm
2 November 2010
5.09pm
26 February 2011
Im not so keen on the woman but without her John wouldnt of written some his love songs that were inspired by her (The Blallad of John and Yoko) and I guess, Yoko understanded John as they were both crazy (in a good way obviosly ) but the other Beatles just got fed up with her, she was a bit clingy anyway i guess they made a cute couple.
5.11pm
28 February 2011
5thBeatle said:
Im not so keen on the woman but without her John wouldnt of written some his love songs that were inspired by her (The Blallad of John and Yoko) and I guess, Yoko understanded John as they were both crazy (in a good way obviosly ) but the other Beatles just got fed up with her, she was a bit clingy anyway i guess they made a cute couple.
Yeah, but I think John could've done better than her
I WANT A LOVE THAT'S RIGHT BUT RIGHT IS ONLY HALF OF WHAT'S WRONG
5.14pm
26 February 2011
6.38pm
1 December 2009
Well, maybe. But you wouldn’t see Linda or Cynthia or Pattie making a record as cool as Fly (which I’m listening to right now!)
GEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
8.52pm
4 December 2010
12.17am
7 August 2010
12.37am
4 December 2010
12.47am
3 January 2011
2.34pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
I'm still on the positive side of the like/dislike line. If you were to liken it to a politician's approval rating I would say my approval rating of her is 55% with a margin of error of 10%. How's that for a strong backing?
As for her voice, I could go the rest of my life without hearing it. But that would mean not being able to hear some of John's solo stuff.
Decisions, decisions…
*17*
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
6.21pm
1 May 2010
PennyLane said:
It really depends on the day for me whether I hate her or not. Like today, I tolerrate her. And I'm not too keen on her music but Walking on Thin Ice isn't terribly bad.
I like Walking on Thin Ice. I like a remix that's over there. Very good stuff, you can see John's hand in there. Too bad all her music is not like that. I don't like screaming voices in music.
wow.. 17…
Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie……
Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower…
Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go.
Beware of Darkness…
4 Guest(s)