Log In
Register
6.56am
7 April 2015
Offline
It doesn’t unless we can consider it’s a conspiracy to unjustly,inaccurately,ridiculously label The Beatles a ”boy band”.
But I was responding to the very wrong misperception of them as this in this topic.
6.59am
1 November 2013
Offline
Though it might not be, Maybe your reality doesn’t match up with the rest of us and you really don’t have any family or friends and you’re really not posting on a site but just imagining that you are since you are subconsciously avoiding your reality. Maybe you were really kidnapped and have been locked in a basement for 10 and have lost touch completely with reality.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
Little Piggy Dragonguy
7.57am
7 April 2015
Offline Go to hell what awful things to say to me after all of the great information I posted as a very knowledgeable life long big fan.What you said is crazy and nasty!
The following people thank Randie for this post:
Little Piggy Dragonguy8.09am
Moderators
15 February 2015
Offline 
Wow, Randie, calm down. I’m sure Annadog40 was speaking in jest, no offence meant.
Peace n Luv 
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site! 
8.32am
1 November 2013
Offline Randie said
Go to hell what awful things to say to me after all of the great information I posted as a very knowledgeable life long big fan.What you said is crazy and nasty!
Woah, sorry about that. Didn’t know you would take such offense to that. I meant no ill will with that statement.
Though the statement was less in jest and more an alternate perspective about how the perception of the mind can alter the reality around you (though I think I worded it in a bad way and used a poor example.) This is one way some conspiracy theorist view the world and how they twist anything someone says to fit what they see.
10.53am
5 November 2011
Offline I’m sorry, but that was way too much information. I don’t think it was all necessary. If your point has to one that long I think that means you’re trying too hard, so maybe The Beatles really are a boy band.
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
11.11am
14 February 2016
Offline
unknown said
I’m sorry, but that was way too much information. I don’t think it was all necessary. If your point has to one that long I think that means you’re trying too hard, so maybe The Beatles really are a boy band.
They certainly were boys in a band. I believe back in the 60s they were a boy band, maybe not in todays definition of the word, but they definitely have some of those qualitys.
The following people thank Evangeline for this post:
Little Piggy Dragonguy, Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<I am you as you are you as you are you and you are all together.
11.26am
1 November 2013
Offline Evangeline said
unknown said
I’m sorry, but that was way too much information. I don’t think it was all necessary. If your point has to one that long I think that means you’re trying too hard, so maybe The Beatles really are a boy band.They certainly were boys in a band. I believe back in the 60s they were a boy band, maybe not in todays definition of the word, but they definitely have some of those qualitys.
They are all adults so a Man Band.
11.44am
27 March 2015
Offline They didn’t consider themselves adults, though. They thought of Brian and George M. as adults, but they considered themselves kids more than anything else.
The following people thank Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^< for this post:
Starr Shine?, BeatlebugFormerly Known As JPM-Fangirl --
2016
'Out There' - 07-06-2015 - Ziggo Dome Amsterdam -- 'One On One' - 12-06-2016 - Pinkpop Festival Landgraaf
4.32pm
28 February 2016
Offline I’m interested in the Tavistock Institute conspiracy, I need to look into it more
5.25pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline Never in my life did I think I’d ever be asking anyone this, but @Bullion, have you seen the posts by @MOCKSWELL on this forum?
Here’s a thread of his. https://www.beatlesbible.com/f…../bookswell
There’s more. Lots more here and there on the forum.
I tempt fate by @atting him. But, he’s ok and fairly interesting and entertaining within the confines of discussion like this.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
BullionCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. 
(2017) 
(2018)
7.54am
1 January 2017
Offline ATTENTION!!!
Here’s a lesser known conspiracy about our George. A fellow by the name of Carl Boyd Harrison claims to be the child of George and Pattie, born sometime in 1966. I’ll let him explain for himself:
"Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles... "
2017:
10.48am
14 February 2016
Offline I don’t really think he is George’s son, if he was, it isn’t likely that Pattie would’ve put him up for adoption. If he was someone else’s kid, then the adoption seems more plausible to me.
If he actually is Pattie’s and someone else’s son, that means that Pattie had to be missing from George’s life for around 44 weeks.
The following people thank Evangeline for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog, Starr Shine?, Beatlebug, C.R.A.I am you as you are you as you are you and you are all together.
2.44pm
Moderators
27 November 2016
Offline Anything is possible, especially with members of a band that is obsessed with love and sex.
That being said, I find myself erring on the side of unlikely, purely for this guy taking 51 years to stake his claim.
The following people thank The Hole Got Fixed for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog#AppleHoley2024: Make America Great For The First Time
2016 awards: 
2017 awards: 
2018 awards:
2019 awards: 
2020 awards:
2021 awards:
5.35pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline The claim was discussed, mocked and ridiculed on the forum previously, tho nothing comes up in a search. Strange.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
5.38pm
1 November 2013
Offline I looked and there was one mentioned by me back in 2014 in the derail thread.
I remember Mr. Kite saying that Pattie wanted kids.
7.01pm
Members
18 March 2013
Offline Pattie looks like she is unable to have kids, she said she and George tried all throughout their marriage but nothing came out of it. Either she was pregnant and miscarried at the very early stages (within the first few weeks) or she just never fell pregnant*.
I don’t think she was physically able to have kids and of course IVF wasn’t available then so biologically she can’t have kids.
*Another ridiculous cute George moment is that whenever asked why they didn’t have kids. George would always say it was his fault that they couldn’t have kids rather than Pattie having to say it. George obviously was wrong later because he did end up having a child while Pattie has never had any. But it’s very sweet that he took the ‘blame’ for it.
The following people thank AppleScruffJunior for this post:
William Shears Campbell, Beatlebug, SgtPeppersBulldog
INTROVERTS UNITE! Separately....in your own homes!
***
Make Love, Not Wardrobes!
***
"Stop throwing jelly beans at me"- George Harrison
1.44am
5 February 2014
Offline
Evangeline said
I don’t really think he is George’s son, if he was, it isn’t likely that Pattie would’ve put him up for adoption. If he was someone else’s kid, then the adoption seems more plausible to me.If he actually is Pattie’s and someone else’s son, that means that Pattie had to be missing from George’s life for around 44 weeks.
He does resemble Patti a bit, tho.
direct fb link: https://www.facebook.com/CarlB…..ydHarrison
1 Guest(s)