4.34pm
3 February 2022
8.16pm
18 April 2013
10.51am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Yep, Paul McCartney admits to saying racist things when he was young https://time.com/4358104/paul-…..-as-a-kid/
But, The Beatles realized that racism was wrong in their early adult years. They refused to play to segregated crowds. Paul wrote Blackbird . Billy Preston became a integral part of the Get Back project. Paul has made a record with Kanye and Beyonce.
I’m sure the non-racist list involving Beatles is many, many times longer that any list of them showing racism.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
Rube, penny lane, Vera Chuckandave, QuarryManCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
4.30pm
7 February 2022
Listening to the Get Back Nagra tapes tonight (january 6, end of disc 1) and was quite shocked to hear Paul casually refer to John Lee Hooker as a ‘spade blues singer’.
2.30pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
What annoys me about the new political correctness, the woke culture – on subjects from racism to gender politics to sexuality – is how people seem to judge those who came before by today’s standards.
Yes, you wouldn’t send your kid out to a fancy dress event in blackface now, and if you did, it’d the parent who’d be judged, not the child. Somehow though, Ringo as a young child appearing in blackface in the ’40s is offered as a suggestion of racism on his part, despite the fact that blackface was a common form of entertainment. It has rightly become viewed as racist and unacceptable, but at the time it was a normal part of life, with the majority of those involved in it not associating it with racism in any way.
Again, with Paul using the word “spade”, it’s use was common at the time, among people of all colours, and without the majority of those who used the term believing they were being racist. No different to the use of “Paddy” to describe the Irish or “Jock” the Scottish. They were not viewed as the lazy, offensive stereotypes they are now then.
I grew up in ’70s, and am well aware that there was language I used then that I wouldn’t use now, as well as things I did then that I wouldn’t do now (bad impersonations of the Indian/Pakistani bus conductor, etc.), but it was a different world, a different country, then, and judging these things by today’s standards does those who lived in different times a disservice – as well as those who’ll jump up and down condemning things decades later.
I’m not applauding the way things were, far from, but do recognise they were different times, and so don’t judge individuals by their use of language or blacking up in the same way as I would were they still doing it. That was then, we learnt, we got better, the societal norms changed.
What’s important is not their use of the language of the times, or their doing things like doing blackface at a time it was common and wasn’t viewed as being racist in the way it is now, but their interactions with those of different ethnic groups, and their standing against things that WERE viewed as racist at the times.
Their first proper tour of the US, they refused to play to segregated audiences. That took balls, especially in the Southern states, where most major artists – including black performers – were not challenging having to play to segregated audiences. The people they were always most excited to meet were the black American artists who’d so inspired them. From early on they appreciated those of different ethnicities to them, from Lord Woodbine to Roy Young to Billy Preston.
Hell, at the same time Paul is using a word like “spade” (again, common language at the time), from the early versions of Get Back to stuff like Commonwealth and Enoch Powell, they’re protesting those things that were viewed as racist at the times.
The context is always important. You can choose to damn them for displaying some of the societal norms of the times which are frowned upon now, or applaud them for facing down and confronting the more overt racism of the time, and being a part of the change in attitudes which helped create a world where we can raise an eyebrow at some of what was quite normal then.
I choose to applaud them for the big part they played in changing those outdated views.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
meaigs, meanmistermustard, Ahhh Girl, Beatlebug, penny lane, Vera Chuckandave, Expert Textpert, Expert Textpert, Expert Textpert, Expert Textpert, Expert Textpert, Expert Textpert, Expert Textpert, Expert Textpert, Mr. Moonlight, Von Bontee, Marcelo, Rube, Neely"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
5.36pm
9 December 2017
Ron Nasty said
What annoys me about the new political correctness, the woke culture – on subjects from racism to gender politics to sexuality – is how people seem to judge those who came before by today’s standards.Yes, you wouldn’t send your kid out to a fancy dress event in blackface now, and if you did, it’d the parent who’d be judged, not the child. Somehow though, Ringo as a young child appearing in blackface in the ’40s is offered as a suggestion of racism on his part, despite the fact that blackface was a common form of entertainment. It has rightly become viewed as racist and unacceptable, but at the time it was a normal part of life, with the majority of those involved in it not associating it with racism in any way.
Again, with Paul using the word “spade”, it’s use was common at the time, among people of all colours, and without the majority of those who used the term believing they were being racist. No different to the use of “Paddy” to describe the Irish or “Jock” the Scottish. They were not viewed as the lazy, offensive stereotypes they are now then.
I grew up in ’70s, and am well aware that there was language I used then that I wouldn’t use now, as well as things I did then that I wouldn’t do now (bad impersonations of the Indian/Pakistani bus conductor, etc.), but it was a different world, a different country, then, and judging these things by today’s standards does those who lived in different times a disservice – as well as those who’ll jump up and down condemning things decades later.
I’m not applauding the way things were, far from, but do recognise they were different times, and so don’t judge individuals by their use of language or blacking up in the same way as I would were they still doing it. That was then, we learnt, we got better, the societal norms changed.
What’s important is not their use of the language of the times, or their doing things like doing blackface at a time it was common and wasn’t viewed as being racist in the way it is now, but their interactions with those of different ethnic groups, and their standing against things that WERE viewed as racist at the times.
Their first proper tour of the US, they refused to play to segregated audiences. That took balls, especially in the Southern states, where most major artists – including black performers – were not challenging having to play to segregated audiences. The people they were always most excited to meet were the black American artists who’d so inspired them. From early on they appreciated those of different ethnicities to them, from Lord Woodbine to Roy Young to Billy Preston.
Hell, at the same time Paul is using a word like “spade” (again, common language at the time), from the early versions of Get Back to stuff like Commonwealth and Enoch Powell, they’re protesting those things that were viewed as racist at the times.
The context is always important. You can choose to damn them for displaying some of the societal norms of the times which are frowned upon now, or applaud them for facing down and confronting the more overt racism of the time, and being a part of the change in attitudes which helped create a world where we can raise an eyebrow at some of what was quite normal then.
I choose to applaud them for the big part they played in changing those outdated views.
Couldn’t agree more @ Ron Nasty.
When I was about the age that Ringo was in that photo I would sit and watch the black and white minstrel show on the BBC and throughly enjoy it. This was, after all, harmless (or so I thought)”entertainment” at the time.
Of course I now look back and realise how thoroughly inappropriate the show was but it was, be it right or wrong, of its time and society moves on. No nine or ten year old can possibly be aware of this so cannot be judged. In fact, I am proud to say I never heard one racist comment from my parent’s mouths despite the fact they also enjoyed this show and, (unfortunately)”goodness gracious me” by Peter Sellars and Sophia Loren which just sounds embarrassingly ridiculous now.
Oh yes, the 60’s and 70’s……As lennon sung in 1980….”strange days indeed”….
The following people thank Vera Chuckandave for this post:
Mr. Moonlight, Beatlebug, Marcelo, RubeAnd my bird can't sing......!!
5.43pm
9 December 2017
1.53am
23 January 2022
I don’t think either kid looks like Ringo
Also, well said @Ron Nasty !
The following people thank meaigs for this post:
Vera ChuckandaveMy hot take is that after the Beatles split they went down the paths of spiritualism, solipsism, alcoholism, and Paul McCartney
-- Jason Carty, Nothing is Real podcast
5.35am
Moderators
27 November 2016
I’m fairly ‘woke’, and believe cancel culture has its place (although that place is not nearly as common as it is currently).
There is a line between fighting fights worth fighting, and fighting pointless fights. This is one of those things that more often gets reported by the Murdoch media as a beat-up to anger its conservative supporters towards progressives, through virtue of having a provocative headline.
‘Woke culture takes aim at beloved drummer Ringo Starr !’
No.
There is a satirical newspaper who sent a tip-off to our branch of Murdoch here last year, claiming woke people were trying to ban fairy bread (popular Aussie dessert). They did no research into it, instead just published it trying to cause a stir, then got egg on their face when it was revealed who tipped them off.
Nobody is claiming that a 10 year old Ringo was the cause of suffering for generations of minorities. As AG said, the moment they grew old enough to develop critical thinking, they realised it was wrong – as well as fought what fights they could to make things right. There is no issue here, just something aiming to cause a stir.
Ron Nasty said
What annoys me about the new political correctness, the woke culture – on subjects from racism to gender politics to sexuality – is how people seem to judge those who came before by today’s standards.
What I’ve been trying to get at in this reply is this – yes, the line of where to judge people from days gone by is probably too harsh currently, however there needs to be a line. As people become adults they develop critical thinking, they should realise that it discriminating on other humans is wrong – yes societal norms were different, but there were too many hurtful things to excuse all of them. A “bad impersonation of the Indian/Pakistani bus conductor” is not something that should be punished 50 years later (like a 10 year old in blackface), but there are many things that should be.
Kids show learned behaviour, you can’t punish that. Adults should display intelligent behaviour and be role models.
The following people thank The Hole Got Fixed for this post:
Von Bontee, Rube, Vera Chuckandave, QuarryMan#AppleHoley2024: Make America Great For The First Time
2016 awards: 2017 awards: 2018 awards: 2019 awards: 2020 awards: 2021 awards:
8.55am
14 December 2009
magus26 said
Listening to the Get Back Nagra tapes tonight (january 6, end of disc 1) and was quite shocked to hear Paul casually refer to John Lee Hooker as a ‘spade blues singer’.
Yeah, there was an unfortunate tendency in the 60s among certain white people enamored of Black culture (John, Allen Ginsberg, Robert Plant, others) to occasionally use that word “spade” in an admiring (yet still “othering”) sort of way. Similar to how some white hip-hop kids would address one another with the n-word.
It seems to be a case of white people reasoning that their own personal anti-racism makes it OK for them to use these slurs as a misguided show of solidarity.
The following people thank Von Bontee for this post:
The Hole Got Fixed, magus26, RubePaul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
6.39am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Yes, it is real, @Andy Stanza, but not at all what you think.
It’s from the 1967 Richard Lester film How I Won the War; John is playing Musketeer Gripweed on a mission behind German lines in WWII and is wearing exaggerated military camouflage make-up from the period. He is not, viewed in its correct context, wearing blackface, you’re just seeing blackface because you’re missing the context.
The film is a satire on war, with Lester using colour throughout to make points (with characters who have been killed turning up in uniforms coloured red, blue or green with their faces also coloured to resemble toy soldiers).
I couldn’t even attempt to guess at the amount of war films where I have seen soldiers applying dark camouflage make-up before going into combat, and that’s what John’s make-up was lampooning, not people of colour.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Richard, Sea Belt, Ahhh Girl, Rube, Timothy"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
9.37pm
7 November 2022
It’s amazing that the 2008 film Tropic Thunder was made at all (and I doubt it could be made now), with Robert Downey Jr. playing a black man.
The following people thank Sea Belt for this post:
RubeNow today I find, you have changed your mind
1 Guest(s)