Log In
Register
4.26pm
14 January 2013
Offline
unknown said
sky090909 said
VBeat said
I think that if Rock’n’Roll arrived today you would be the ones calling it “noise”, right?Depends if the “noise” is good or not.
You probably know what early rock and roll is, so it really doesn’t depend, I don’t think.
true
However, if rock’n’roll formed today would have been different?
4.33pm
5 November 2011
Offline sky090909 said
unknown said
sky090909 said
VBeat said
I think that if Rock’n’Roll arrived today you would be the ones calling it “noise”, right?Depends if the “noise” is good or not.
You probably know what early rock and roll is, so it really doesn’t depend, I don’t think.
true
However, if rock’n’roll formed today would have been different?
If it arrived today, then we wouldn’t have had any Beatles, or most bands today, so I don’t know. I took it as she was saying we would be the ones back then who hated rock and roll, and didn’t mean today as literally today, more like if we were living back then.
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
4.43pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline 
unknown said
sky090909 said
unknown said
sky090909 said
VBeat said
I think that if Rock’n’Roll arrived today you would be the ones calling it “noise”, right?Depends if the “noise” is good or not.
You probably know what early rock and roll is, so it really doesn’t depend, I don’t think.
true
However, if rock’n’roll formed today would have been different?
If it arrived today, then we wouldn’t have had any Beatles, or most bands today, so I don’t know. I took it as she was saying we would be the ones back then who hated rock and roll, and didn’t mean today as literally today, more like if we were living back then.
Thats how i took it but im bored by the original poster having a go at us all for not liking what she put up. Big whoop. More acting like a 5 year old going into a strop for their parents not jumping about at their latest picture.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
4.47pm
14 January 2013
Offline unknown said
sky090909 said
unknown said
sky090909 said
VBeat said
I think that if Rock’n’Roll arrived today you would be the ones calling it “noise”, right?Depends if the “noise” is good or not.
You probably know what early rock and roll is, so it really doesn’t depend, I don’t think.
true
However, if rock’n’roll formed today would have been different?
If it arrived today, then we wouldn’t have had any Beatles, or most bands today, so I don’t know. I took it as she was saying we would be the ones back then who hated rock and roll, and didn’t mean today as literally today, more like if we were living back then.
I kind of took it both cause I don’t know what she really meant. Sorry, my brain is confusing.lol
9.18am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline
Hi, Vanessa, how are you? Hope you’re enjoying The Beatles Bible. Well, the “Classic” isn’t bad. There’s a nice crispness to the percussion. And none of that silliness. Not good enough to buy, and it does come with a bunch of abominations, but hey! – you’ve got to be admired for your sheer tenacity and refusal to give up.
"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
11.40am
23 January 2013
Offline Hi Mja! I’m good, thankyou. And you? I’m a superfan of the Beatles so they actually “are” the Bible for me… 
I’m happy you quite like the “Classic” version. This is more in the style of the Elvis Presley remixes that Spankox produced lately, more lets say close to the originals. Have you heard any of them?
5.26pm
20 December 2010
Offline Is this an ‘official’ EMI release? and if so, who produced it. If it’s just someone who do to public domain decided to take the song and do their own remixing, then I’m not interested. I check the Beatles website and it doesn’t look like an official release.
The further one travels, the less one knows
3.25am
20 May 2013
Offline Inner Light said
Is this an ‘official’ EMI release? and if so, who produced it. If it’s just someone who do to public domain decided to take the song and do their own remixing, then I’m not interested. I check the Beatles website and it doesn’t look like an official release.
No, it’s not official. It’s a horrible fan re-mix. There are full reviews earlier in this thread. I like to give stuff a shot even if the reviews are terrible… huge mistake. I wish I could unlisten to these remixes.
3.31am
16 August 2012
Offline Welcome, new guy!
I love the fact that your first post is hating on this horrible monstrosity. Well done.
E is for 'Ergent'.
4.30am
14 January 2013
Offline I thought this thread faded into the darkness of hell.
Anyways, welcome new guy!
5.05pm
14 December 2009
Offline
Aw c’mon, this is the first time I’ve encountered this thread and I’m finding it hilarious! I do like VBeat’s never-say-die chutzpah: “Have a listen! Care to buy it? Can’t stand the free bit you heard? Try paying the whole thing, then you’ll like it! Still don’t want it? You must be old and ready for retirement. 2000 dancing Frenchmen can’t be wrong! Still don’t care? OK, I guess if you still don’t care, then…here’s a new Classic mix!”
Wonderful stuff, especially the apparent oxymoron “new classic”!
Hello William Campbell, welcome!
Paul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
5.10pm
16 August 2012
Offline I never thought I’d say this, but “Thank god for lawyers”.
It looks like EMI caught wind (a foul stench) of this crass piece of slop.
Now all we can do with this thread is remember how awful it was…
E is for 'Ergent'.
5.18pm
14 December 2009
Offline Oh damn, now I may never get the chance to pay money to hear several extended dance mixes of one of my least-favourite Beatles songs… 
Paul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
5.39pm
Reviewers
29 November 2012
Offline SatanHimself said
Welcome, new guy!I love the fact that your first post is hating on this horrible monstrosity. Well done.
"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"
Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist
Twitter: @rocknrollchem
Facebook: rnrchemist
5.40pm
Reviewers
29 November 2012
Offline SatanHimself said
I never thought I’d say this, but “Thank god for lawyers”.It looks like EMI caught wind (a foul stench) of this crass piece of slop.
Now all we can do with this thread is remember how awful it was…
Do you have a link for that? I’d love to read about EMI’s lawyers attack on this ghastly atrocity committed in the name of Beatles music!
"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"
Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist
Twitter: @rocknrollchem
Facebook: rnrchemist
1.16pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline Apple sue most folk who try and rip them off as thats what they do.
Is there anyway i get back the 3 minutes i spent listening to those remixes, eliminate the memories of having to listen to them or even see the terrible video that went with it, or the time spent on this threat?
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
1.34pm
5 November 2011
Offline 
Yeah, eat an apple.
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
3.26pm
21 November 2012
Offline Von Bontee said
Oh damn, now I may never get the chance to pay money to hear several extended dance mixes of one of my least-favourite Beatles songs…
I know, sad isn’t it
I completely forgot about this thread so I came here but then I remembered.
12.32am
22 September 2013
Offline A truly excruciating new remix of Love Me Do for your listening pleasure. Although I’m sure there’ll be no-one out there who likes this, it (along with three other terrible mixes) can be bought from Amazon for £4.90:
3 Guest(s)