Log In
Register
3.43pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Offline
@Nathan-Clark said
I honestly don’t even know what he was doing in 1979.
Baking bread and keeping up with the baby, occourse! Oh, and getting pissed at George for not mentioning him much in his book. 
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Nathan Clark, SgtPeppersBulldog, Jenna L([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site! 
4.17pm
27 February 2017
Offline Zig said
It’s difficult for me to pin down an absolute favorite look for each. It is easy, however, to pick a worst look and that is any photo of any one of them in which the only facial hair is a moustache. Especially Paul.
For me, John looks actually the best in his Sgt Pepper look
Isn’t that adorable?
Paul looks quite good with the mustache too but my favourite look of him is what parlance described as the Hot Paul Period
Really sweet!
Ringo’s best look is this one in my opinion ( about 1981):
And this is my all time favourite picture of George (though A Hard Day’s Night George was really close):
These are the worst looks in my opinion:
I won’t elaborate on them – it is too painful…
The following people thank Martha for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog, BeatlebugNot once does the diversity seem forced -- the genius of the record is how the vaudevillian "When I'm 64" seems like a logical extension of "Within You Without You" and how it provides a gateway to the chiming guitars of "Lovely Rita. - Stephen T. Erlewine on Sgt Pepper's
8.55pm
11 April 2016
Offline Martha said
I won’t elaborate on them – it is too painful…
You don’t love the mystical Georgietail? I think he looks gorgeous!
I can imagine how much more beautiful he’d look without the beard!
Yum. 
The following people thank WeepingAtlasCedars for this post:
Martha, SgtPeppersBulldog, Beatlebug"WeepyC came into the fray as the premier Jimmy Page fan, and will remain." - sir walter raleigh
2016 & 2017: 
2020: 
10.47pm
9 March 2017
Offline Best:
I really like the look he had during The Beatles sessions (also known as the White Album ), he has that cool guy look, nothing like the clean cut look he sported just 4 years earlier.
Worst:
John looks he’s in his 50’s in this picture, I can’t stand to look.
Best:
I can’t think of a cuter male than Paul McCartney from 1968, even as a heterosexual male I must admit that if I were an 18 year old girl back in 1968 and I saw this picture, I would hang it up in my room and drool over it and dream about being Mrs. Paul McCartney , Paul is the cutest Beatle and I can definitely see why those were girls were screaming and hanging outside of the studio, back in the 60’s Paul could get any girl he wanted without even trying.
Worst:
Nothing worse than a cute man like Paul covering himself with an ugly mullet and a having a “porn star” (also known as 70’s cop) moustache. Men like Paul were meant to be clean shaven, they were never meant to have facial hair or long hair.
Best:
I think George looked great in 1968, especially with Lucy, his Cherry Red 1957 Gibson Les Paul Standard.
Worst:
You often look bad when you’re dying and this is no exception.
Best:
Ringo is the only Beatle where I can say that he looks better with facial hair than clean shaven, I think he looked his best during 1968.
Worst:
When you’re old, expect to look your worst.
By the way Nathan Clark, 1969 Ringo isn’t post Beatles Ringo because The Beatles were together until 1970, with the last session containing any Beatle being on April 1st, which Ringo was at.
The following people thank Dark Overlord for this post:
BeatlebugIf you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
12.30am
27 February 2017
Offline WeepingAtlasCedars said
You don’t love the mystical Georgietail? I think he looks gorgeous!
I can imagine how much more beautiful he’d look without the beard!
Yum.
You’re right he’d probably look amazing without the beard but I just don’t like the beard itself. It’s so strawy and covers his great chin!
The following people thank Martha for this post:
WeepingAtlasCedarsNot once does the diversity seem forced -- the genius of the record is how the vaudevillian "When I'm 64" seems like a logical extension of "Within You Without You" and how it provides a gateway to the chiming guitars of "Lovely Rita. - Stephen T. Erlewine on Sgt Pepper's
6.15am
17 January 2016
Offline Just peeking in here. Placeholder, I’ll think this one through and come back. But I will say, for John, 1967 ca. Sgt Pepper is up there, loved that short haired mustachioed look. Be back in a bit…
“She wasn't doing a thing that I could see, except standing there leaning on the balcony railing, holding the universe together.” - J.D. Salinger
10.06am
1 January 2017
Offline WeepingAtlasCedars said
You don’t love the mystical Georgietail? I think he looks gorgeous!
I can imagine how much more beautiful he’d look without the beard!
Yum.
Or you could say…
*puts on sunglasses*
“He looks Georgeous.”
Proceed on topic…
The following people thank SgtPeppersBulldog for this post:
Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars, BeatleSnut"Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles... "
2017:
12.57pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Offline @Martha said
You’re right he’d probably look amazing without the beard but I just don’t like the beard itself. It’s so strawy and covers his great chin!
Yeah, I agree. The mythical Georgietail I mind not, and he’s kinda cute in that pic, actually — his expression, anyway. I wouldn’t mind Jesus-George without the beard. His chin is too good to cover up, and his beard isn’t even that impressive (sorry Geo).
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Martha, WeepingAtlasCedars([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
3.45pm
26 April 2017
Offline Dark Overlord said
By the way Nathan Clark, 1969 Ringo isn’t post Beatles Ringo because The Beatles were together until 1970, with the last session containing any Beatle being on April 1st, which Ringo was at.
I know, the post Beatles picture I used was taken in 1974. I like it cause it looks just like 1969. 🙂
~ I hate Q's They're just O's with little tails.
5.17pm
5 April 2017
Offline 
1962: Immature and searching for an identity
1963: boyband and bubblegum (especially those horrendous silver colored suits)
1964: Cleancut but a little more mature
1965: The Shea stadium suits, general clothes, music and the style around the recordings of Rubber Soul were great, cool, fresh and awesome
1966: Their best period (especially John’s and Ringo’s)… Nothing beats the style, clothes and sunglasses combined with the crunchy “semi-psychedelic” guitar tracks around the time of Rain and Revolver .
1967: The mysterious psychedelic period where you can imagine them being loners in the autumny woods or in “deserted” places with long coats, scruffy hair and moustaches just tripping out and dreaming (Strawberry Fields, Fool On The Hill, Blue Jay Way , Flying , and more).
1968: The independent period where they all had different styles.
1969: John with long greasy, stringy hair did not look good at all. Paul looked pretty good with combed back hair and a beard. Ringo also looked pretty good and George was okay.
1970: Downhill…
The following people thank IAmTheLongbus for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog, Beatlebug2.11pm
12 November 2016
Offline Might be a stupid or already asked question but I was wondering what is your favourite hairstyle of John’s?
Long Live The Beatles!
2.22pm
26 January 2017
Offline 64-65 medium length with bangs that go to the side. I wore that for a long time.
The following people thank sir walter raleigh for this post:
Beatlebug"The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles!"
-Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues
"We could ride and surf together while our love would grow"
-Brian Wilson, Surfer Girl
8.54pm
11 April 2016
Offline I wholeheartedly agree with sir walter. 
Oh, and add in ’66, ’cause it gave us this gorgeous fringe:
I cannot express how much I love that delicious hairstyle. Yummy WeepyC calm down.
The following people thank WeepingAtlasCedars for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog, Beatlebug"WeepyC came into the fray as the premier Jimmy Page fan, and will remain." - sir walter raleigh
2016 & 2017:
2020:
9.02pm
9 March 2017
Offline I don’t know, i really dig the Revolution look, it gives John a I don’t style my hair to impress people kind of look.
The following people thank Dark Overlord for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog, BeatlebugIf you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
7.58am
Moderators
15 February 2015
Offline Good point, @Dark Overlord, but I still love that ’65-’66 fringe.
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
WeepingAtlasCedars([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
2.37pm
Members
18 March 2013
Offline Huh, I hate John’s 1966 hair, the fringe is alright but the back is way, way too long for that hairstyle- it looks rotten. 1965 was perfect moptop for him.
George on the other hand looked fab throughout ’66 and ’65.
The following people thank AppleScruffJunior for this post:
Beatlebug, SgtPeppersBulldog
INTROVERTS UNITE! Separately....in your own homes!
***
Make Love, Not Wardrobes!
***
"Stop throwing jelly beans at me"- George Harrison
2 Guest(s)