Log In
Register
4.02am
1 August 2013
Offline
As a young man, I grew up with The Beatles’ 1987 CD editions (which, in retrospect, are horrible). So when I’d listen to Disc 2 of the White Album , I would see that both “Can You Take Me Back” and the G. Martin-A. Taylor conversation (“Bottle of claret…”) were tacked on to the end of “Cry Baby Cry “. This is the way I assumed that it was meant to be until the 2009 remasters (Where “Cry” ends after “CYTMB” and “Revolution 9 ” begins at “Bottle of claret”). This seemed just fine to me until I discovered that some people don’t consider either to be correct: many say that “Can You Take Me Back” is part of “9”, serving as a sort of overture. I’m sure there’s no official answer to this, since the composer of both songs is no longer alive, but where do you think “Cry Baby Cry ” ends and “Revolution 9 ” begins?
Thanks!
4.22am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline
Welcome 9
It is an oft argued question. I first heard it on vinyl many years ago, when you didn’t have these chapter marks. I have always approached it like this, Cry Baby Cry ends, there is a short little hidden link track (Can You Take Me Back?), and then Revolution 9 starts with a little bit of studio chat.
Hope you might consider introducing on the “Introduce yourself to the forum” thread in All Together Now and feel welcome here.
"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
11.55am
21 November 2012
Offline That’s how I see it too. And if I would have to divide it in 2 songs, if I’d say ‘”Can You Take Me Back” was part of one of them, I’d say it was part of Cry Baby Cry .
The following people thank Linde for this post:
Oudis12.34pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline Cry Baby Cry ends with the final “Cry” before going into the hidden link track Can You Take Me Back. There are 3 songs not 2. That’s how I see it.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Paulrus the Walrus"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
1.03pm
Reviewers
29 November 2012
Offline 
Linde said
That’s how I see it too. And if I would have to divide it in 2 songs, if I’d say ‘”Can You Take Me Back” was part of one of them, I’d say it was part of Cry Baby Cry .
That’s how I’ve always seen it. As a very spooky, eerie, and effective coda to Cry Baby Cry …I think they fit perfectly together, serendipity or not.
The following people thank DrBeatle for this post:
Oudis"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"
Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist
Twitter: @rocknrollchem
Facebook: rnrchemist
9.26pm
1 December 2009
Offline 
I’ve always wondered how they came to keep that scrap, and how they decided to place it at the end of “Cry Baby Cry ” (as opposed to after “I Will “, which was recorded during the same session.) Possibly as a kind of “last glimpse” of Paul McCartney , who disappears from the remainder of that album (an entire half-side!) after that point?
Anyways, on my old Capitol vinyl copy from the ’80s, the “bottle of claret…” appeared at the start of “#9”, physically separated from the end of “Can You Take Me Back” by the ‘rill’. So I’ve always assumed that’s proper.
GEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
9.34pm
16 August 2012
Offline I think it helps to remember that this was created in the days before digital track markers.
This was a work of art, and the artists added random things here and there to enhance the experience.
Can You Take Me Back is what’s known as an Interstitial. It exists as a part of the whole album but not of any particular song. It was put there for fun, the flow of the album, to make a bridge into “Revolution 9 “, because McCartney particularly liked the way he sung it… Whatever reason.
As digital CD track markings go, it should have been coded to exist in the “pre-gap” track with the counter held to 00:00, so it isn’t part of either song. It’s just… There.
The following people thank SatanHimself for this post:
OudisE is for 'Ergent'.
11.29pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline I read somewhere a reason why Can You Take Me Back was inserted into the running order and cannot remember for the life of me where or what it said exactly? Anyone?
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
9.49am
31 March 2008
Offline
I don’t know why it was used, MMM. I presume they just thought it was a nice little addition.
Come Together /Dear Prudence /Cry Baby Cry is one of the tracks on the Love album. As far as I can tell the only part of CBC in the song is “Can you take me back”. I’ve a feeling the publishing for CBC also included CYTMB, rather than the latter being a separate song.
Can buy me love! Please consider supporting the Beatles Bible on Amazon
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs
Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!
2.24am
25 August 2012
Offline I agree it’s more fitting that “Cry, Baby, Cry” ends with “Can You Take Me Back,” and “Revolution 9 ” begins with the studio chatter.
The following people thank Duke_of_Kirkcaldy for this post:
Oudis2.35am
16 August 2012
Offline Again people… It’s NOT part of either track. Artists drop interesting things into their work sometimes for the hell of it. Stop over-analyzing it. For whatever reason, they tacked an interesting unused song fragment between two other songs when assembling the album.
In the CD age, it arbitrarily got assigned as part of the track marker for “Cry Baby Cry “.
I get that in the current age of digital files that 20-second stretch of music is required to be part of another song, but in 1968 it was just something that was included as part of a whole. It is interstitial.
E is for 'Ergent'.
6.26am
1 August 2013
Offline SatanHimself said
I get that in the current age of digital files that 20-second stretch of music is required to be part of another song, but in 1968 it was just something that was included as part of a whole.
Actually, no. As I’m sure you know, songs on LPs are separated by thin, slightly different colored circles called rills. That means that songs that were separated by rills are independent, and parts that aren’t separated are part of another track. The four shortest Beatles songs, Her Majesty , Maggie Mae , Dig It , and Wild Honey Pie were all separated by rills (so length doesn’t matter). If they really wanted it to be, Can You Take Me Back could easily have been separated. But it wasn’t.(Sorry, I’m not at home, so I don’t have a picture of the vinyl.) That means unless it was a production oversight, it is part of one of the two songs.
The following people thank #9 for this post:
Oudis6.56am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline What you are missing that in 1967, for Sgt. Pepper , they issued instructions for “no rills” between certain tracks. For instance, there is no rill between Sgt. Pepper and With A Little Help From My Friends , there are no rills between Good Morning Good Morning , Sgt. Pepper (Reprise) and A Day In The Life . On the White Album there is no rill between Back In The USSR and Dear Prudence , no rill between Bungalow Bill and While My Guitar, no rill between I’m So Tired and Blackbird , and many others. And the rill you quote for Her Majesty is actually an artificial one created by the 17 seconds of silence that were on the master tape, it was not cut as a rill. Would you argue that all these tracks that were cut without rills were actually single tracks?
"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
7.29am
1 August 2013
Offline mja6758 said
What you are missing that in 1967, for Sgt. Pepper , they issued instructions for “no rills” between certain tracks. For instance, there is no rill between Sgt. Pepper and With A Little Help From My Friends , there are no rills between Good Morning Good Morning , Sgt. Pepper (Reprise) and A Day In The Life . On the White Album there is no rill between Back In The USSR and Dear Prudence , no rill between Bungalow Bill and While My Guitar, no rill between I’m So Tired and Blackbird , and many others. And the rill you quote for Her Majesty is actually an artificial one created by the 17 seconds of silence that were on the master tape, it was not cut as a rill. Would you argue that all these tracks that were cut without rills were actually single tracks?
No, because they were listed as such. There’s no good reason to think of Can You Take Me Back as a separate song, other than the fact that it’s a different recording. It’s like saying “Oh my soul, so harsh” at the end of I’ve Got A Feeling is a different track. Or Danny Boy at the end of One After 909 . Or the weird mellotron fade-in section of Strawberry Fields. (By the way, there definitely are rills between GMGM, Reprise, and ADITL. There are also rills between USSR & Prudence, Bungalow Bill & Guitar, and Tired & Blackbird . I’m 90% sure that it is a true rill between The End and Her Majesty . The darkness that on, say, the false-fadeout of Helter Skelter is definitely different from the darkness I see before Her Majesty .)
8.20am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline I think this may depend on your definition of rills and their definition. I refer to the recording sheet for the first assembly of Sgt. Pepper here (slightly different track-listing to the final LP but same instructions). Both sides are listed as “No Rills” with this note added at the end, to make the instruction clear to the cutting engineer, “No gaps between items – Ends of die-away joined to following item – as per G. Martin”. A rill, strictly speaking, is a period of silence separating two tracks that is cut slightly wider to allow a listener to navigate the disc. That cutting engineers, Porky in particular, found a way to mark the end of track by cutting the groove slightly wider at that point while still having it carry sound does not make it a rill as they understood one. That the definition changed slightly over time to take in their innovation, and its use by others, does not change their meaning at the time. As to Her Majesty , of course it looks different to how the gap looks for Helter Skelter – Helter Skelter did not have a 17 second gap before it faded back in. And, if you have an original copy of Abbey Road , just as Can You Take Me Back is not listed on The White Album , Her Majesty was not listed on Abbey Road .
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Richard"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
8.54am
1 August 2013
Offline mja6758 said
I think this may depend on your definition of rills and their definition. I refer to the recording sheet for the first assembly of Sgt. Pepper here (slightly different track-listing to the final LP but same instructions). Both sides are listed as “No Rills” with this note added at the end, to make the instruction clear to the cutting engineer, “No gaps between items – Ends of die-away joined to following item – as per G. Martin”. A rill, strictly speaking, is a period of silence separating two tracks that is cut slightly wider to allow a listener to navigate the disc. That cutting engineers, Porky in particular, found a way to mark the end of track by cutting the groove slightly wider at that point while still having it carry sound does not make it a rill as they understood one. That the definition changed slightly over time to take in their innovation, and its use by others, does not change their meaning at the time. As to Her Majesty , of course it looks different to how the gap looks for Helter Skelter – Helter Skelter did not have a 17 second gap before it faded back in. And, if you have an original copy of Abbey Road , just as Can You Take Me Back is not listed on The White Album , Her Majesty was not listed on Abbey Road .
Yes, I understand rills and all that, but my copies of Sgt. Pepper and the White Album have rills in all the places you said there weren’t. Maybe it’s because they’re later pressings and they’re American. When I said that the Her Majesty rill looked different from the fade out of Helter Skelter , I meant that it simply looked to be of a much different luster– something that cannot be changed by the length of the silence. I’m not sure, though, as I grew up in the CD age. I’ve only had a few years experience with vinyl while you’ve probably had your whole life.
One last point– (as Joe said) Can You Take Me Back was used on the Love CD and was listed as part of Cry Baby Cry , meaning that George Martin considers it to be a part of CBC.
But we’ll never agree on this point. It’s just another great thing about the Beatles. Their music is so… enigmatic.
10.45pm
16 September 2013
Offline #9 said
Yes, I understand rills… It’s just another great thing about the Beatles. Their music is so… enigmatic.
Well, I learned a new word here, “rill.” And, as usual, I’m fascinated by this discussion about rills and the mysterious lack of them on various Beatlealbums. It occurred to me that (quite possibly) the last song that will ever be released by the “Beatles” is titled “Real Love .” Or… could it have been “Rill Love?” Hmm… The group remained enigmatic right to the end.*
*This, uh… new theory is best pondered in a pompous “reads-way-too-deep-into-the-Beatles” voice.
2.43pm
15 August 2013
Offline can you take me back complete:
The following people thank The Lost Beatle for this post:
IveJustSeenAFaceoFrom The Cavern To Candlestick Park
And From Sgt Pepper To Break Up
3.52pm
16 September 2013
Offline This 1:58 version of “Can You Take Me Back?” is fascinating, mostly for this reason: because Paul, the man of a million melodies, was obviously stuck on that one chord. It’s an interesting chord, ringing with unresolved notes, longing to go somewhere. I think there should be a songwriting contest, to finish this melody, and flesh out the germ of the lyrical idea. I would really like to hear where various songwriters would take this haunting fragment. Of course, if Paul happens to read this, he may be so inclined to finish it himself, before any hacks can get their hooks in it. 
The following people thank Bungalow Bob for this post:
The Lost Beatle, ScrambledEggs4.11pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline That video of Can You Take Me Back is not complete, the full performance runs for 2 minutes 21 seconds.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
1 Guest(s)