5.40am
18 May 2019
Feel free to add a link to a forum which explores the same idea, but what are your unpopular Beatles opinions?
Here’s one that no one agrees with: It’s All Too Much > Hey Bulldog
7.28am
1 November 2013
Eairly beatles better than late beatles.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
TimpetusIf you can't log in and can't use the forum go here and someone will help you out.
9.00am
26 January 2017
Billy Preston carried the Let It Be album.
The following people thank sir walter raleigh for this post:
Timpetus"The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles!"
-Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues
"We could ride and surf together while our love would grow"
-Brian Wilson, Surfer Girl
6.58pm
1 July 2020
3.35pm
7 November 2010
The following people thank kelicopter for this post:
Von Bontee, Rube, Beatlebug, sir walter raleighI think it's great you're going through a phase,
and I'm awfully glad it'll all be over in a couple
of days
2020
5.01pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
kelicopter said
Ram is better than McCartney I. There, I said it.There are a few standout tracks on McCartney I, but Ram has a perfect tracklist from start to finish.
Does anyone think ‘McCartney’ is better than ‘Ram ‘, I always thought the latter was deemed superior by the vast majority? ‘McCartney’ is a mixture of many forms verging from nothing home playabouts (‘Lovely Linda) to classics (‘Maybe I’m Amazed ) via boring unintersting crap (‘Kreen-Akrore’) and all in-betweens whereas ‘Ram ‘ is far more formed and thought thru (tho I find the album to be tiresome, mainly due to over-running song durations).
My unpopular opinions are that ‘Penny Lane ‘ and ‘Nowhere Man ‘ are quite boring songs that I find very difficult to care about.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Beatlebug"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
6.21pm
10 January 2024
I don’t really like John. He’s a great song writter dont get me wrong but he’s bad in other regards (*Cough* Julian *Cough*). After beatles break up most of his songs were “meh”. There’s a few solo songs I like but there few and far between. (My dad also doesn’t like John so I think thats where I got the opion from)
I made this my signature to remind me not to change it constantly.
8.43pm
7 November 2010
meanmistermustard said
kelicopter said
Ram is better than McCartney I. There, I said it.
There are a few standout tracks on McCartney I, but Ram has a perfect tracklist from start to finish.
Does anyone think ‘McCartney’ is better than ‘Ram ‘, I always thought the latter was deemed superior by the vast majority? ‘McCartney’ is a mixture of many forms verging from nothing home playabouts (‘Lovely Linda) to classics (‘Maybe I’m Amazed ) via boring unintersting crap (‘Kreen-Akrore’) and all in-betweens whereas ‘Ram ‘ is far more formed and thought thru (tho I find the album to be tiresome, mainly due to over-running song durations).
I guess McCartney is often compared to All Things Must Pass and Plastic Ono Band as it was the first release. But Ram actually gives George and John’s debuts a run for their money.
The following people thank kelicopter for this post:
vonbontee, BeatlebugI think it's great you're going through a phase,
and I'm awfully glad it'll all be over in a couple
of days
2020
4.35am
30 August 2021
meanmistermustard said
Does anyone think ‘McCartney’ is better than ‘Ram ‘, I always thought the latter was deemed superior by the vast majority? ‘McCartney’ is a mixture of many forms verging from nothing home playabouts (‘Lovely Linda) to classics (‘Maybe I’m Amazed ) via boring unintersting crap (‘Kreen-Akrore’) and all in-betweens whereas ‘Ram ‘ is far more formed and thought thru (tho I find the album to be tiresome, mainly due to over-running song durations).
No, I think Ram is the better album, too. And I agree that Paul doesn’t always know when a song is finished.
The following people thank Mr. Moonlight for this post:
kelicopter, Beatlebug"Nothing is Beatle-proof."
7.32am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
The plus to ‘McCartney’ is you have the classics of ‘Every Night ‘ and ‘Maybe I’m Amazed ‘ to pull listeners in and, retrospectively, the one man doing almost everything at home approach is now seen as very future focused when everyone can make an album in their own bedroom. I like ‘Man We We Were Lonely’ as well but at least half of the album could be forgotten – or released 50 years down the line as bonus tracks and ‘Teddy Boy ‘ and ‘Junk’ get folks excited as they are marketed as unheard solo Beatle songs (until heard).
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
kelicopter, Rube, Mr. Moonlight, Beatlebug, sir walter raleigh"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
1.54am
7 November 2022
It’s interesting how people articulate personal subjective likes & dislikes about music in rhetoric that sounds scientific. I suppose part of that is shorthand, since it might be tedious to have to inject caveats at every turn, (e.g., IMHO).
The following people thank Sea Belt for this post:
Mr. MoonlightNow today I find, you have changed your mind
8.24pm
20 March 2018
My unpopular opinion: The music is everything. Lyrics play a pretty small part of whether or not I like a song.
Example: I think Across The Universe is boring and usually skip it even though I recognize it’s lyrical uniqueness.
That doesn’t mean I don’t think meaningful lyrics can elevate a song to greatness, but it has to have an awesome melody first. I almost never hear a great tune and think “The lyrics are silly. I can’t like it.”
The following people thank Timpetus for this post:
Sea Belt, vonbontee"Parading the streets! Trailing your coat! Bowling along! LIVING!"
12.29am
7 November 2022
Bound up with melody I would say is their engineering/instrumentation which as we know with the Beatles, they (especially Paul) became intimately involved with especially from Sergeant Pepper’s on, to augment their melodies.
The following people thank Sea Belt for this post:
Timpetus, BeatlebugNow today I find, you have changed your mind
9.47pm
1 December 2009
kelicopter said
meanmistermustard said
kelicopter said
Ram is better than McCartney I. There, I said it.
There are a few standout tracks on McCartney I, but Ram has a perfect tracklist from start to finish.
Does anyone think ‘McCartney’ is better than ‘Ram ‘, I always thought the latter was deemed superior by the vast majority? ‘McCartney’ is a mixture of many forms verging from nothing home playabouts (‘Lovely Linda) to classics (‘Maybe I’m Amazed ) via boring unintersting crap (‘Kreen-Akrore’) and all in-betweens whereas ‘Ram ‘ is far more formed and thought thru (tho I find the album to be tiresome, mainly due to over-running song durations).
I guess McCartney is often compared to All Things Must Pass and Plastic Ono Band as it was the first release. But Ram actually gives George and John’s debuts a run for their money.
I personally put Ringo’s “Beaucoup Of Blues” up there with the cherries album, quality-wise; though it’s not controversial to opine that John and George outdid them both, as far as 1970 albums go.
The following people thank vonbontee for this post:
Beatlebug, Mr. MoonlightGEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
6.58pm
2 May 2013
Double Fantasy wasn’t just disappointing, it’s embarrassing schlock from start to finish. And he called Paul’s stuff “Granny s**t”, this is way worse.
8.56pm
7 November 2022
I like the slow Revolution infinitely better than the fast version. No contest.
The following people thank Sea Belt for this post:
Mr. MoonlightNow today I find, you have changed your mind
11.30pm
10 January 2024
This one’s an opion I share with people inside the fandom more than outside but
Yoko didn’t break up the beatles. It’s a complex isuse and the breakup can’t be pinned onto one person.
The following people thank Oakwood for this post:
Mr. Moonlight, Danielle435I made this my signature to remind me not to change it constantly.
11.59am
14 June 2016
Old Soak said
Double Fantasy wasn’t just disappointing, it’s embarrassing schlock from start to finish. And he called Paul’s stuff “Granny s**t”, this is way worse.
The content is retro Elvis Orbison – (Just Like) Starting Over and Beatles inspired – Woman , mixed in with how he felt as a man who was 10 years older. It’s a damn good sound for John and one I would’ve liked to have seen continue if he lived longer.
The following people thank Timothy for this post:
Richard, sir walter raleigh1.The Beatles 2.Sgt. Pepper 3.Abbey Road 4.Magical Mystery Tour 5.Rubber Soul 6.Revolver 7.Help! 8.Let It Be
9.A Hard Day’s Night 10.Please Please Me 11.Beatles For Sale 12.With The Beatles 13.Yellow Submarine
Most Avid John Fan 2020 and 2021:
3.08pm
20 July 2014
4.58pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
‘Double Fantasy ‘ was John dipping his toes back into music aged 40 after five years away at a time when he was finally at peace with where he was in life as well as what had gone before. It’s not the same as what he was doing in 1970 but that wasn’t the same John, same goes for ’72 or ’74. Who knows where he would have gone in the 80’s as John never went where people thought he would but tragically he never got the chance.
John made a comeback and everyone had and has these ideas of what he should have given, and I doubt whatever he had released would have met those. For me, ‘I’m Losing You ‘ is as rocking as most of John’s similar tracks, and one of my favourite solo tracks from any of the four – it’s definitely not Granny s**t. I also love ‘Watching The Wheels ‘ which sums up perfectly were John was. I skip ‘Dear Yoko’ and ‘Woman ‘ is badly let down by the production, but so many other solo tracks by all four are so that’s nothing new.
I get why it failed, and continues to fail to meet expectations, but it was almost an inevitable outcome. There was so much expectation back in 1980, possibly more than any album release by any artist before or since (maybe not, who knows – The Beatles in ’95 for one). And all John did was say hello again alongside his wife. I think that’s quite cool. If more albums had followed (I don’t mean like ‘Milk And Honey ‘ which was posthumously finished by Yoko and co) the continuing reaction to ‘Double Fantasy ‘ would be very different. But they didn’t so it isn’t.
Unpopular opinion.
I don’t listen to anything of Paul’s from post ‘Flaming Pie ‘. I could never get into ‘Chaos and Creation’ and his voice for about now 15 years is something I can’t be listening to. ‘New’ might have been OK but I hated the album title more than anything else that’s been released (it is such a dreadful joke that cannot get worse due to how bad it was) and I did listen to ‘McCartney 3’ but thought it was like listening to Dylan nowadays (please, no). I watched the Glastonbury show last year (may be wrong on that) and some of it was ok but there were moments of
Many millions swear he’s still awesome and that’s fine. I’m quite happy to be wrong. They can listen and I don’t have to.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Timothy"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
1 Guest(s)