9.50am
14 November 2017
6.48am
18 December 2017
Father McKenzie said
@TheWalrusWasBrian: George Martin wouldn’t talk to the guy being interviewed for a year. Sorry,i should have worded it better
It’s fine! I honestly wanted it to be that he wouldn’t talk to Paul for a year so I could put that in the *NEXT EXCITING EPISODE OF MY BEATLES FANFIC* but I’m sure I can pull something useful outta this…
The following people thank TheWalrusWasBrian for this post:
Father McKenzie, Beatlebug| | I don’t know how to put it here. hello for the love of god hello
~~~
The Concert for Bageldesh
~~~
Walrian here! Not Fiddy, or anyone else, actually.
7.06am
14 November 2017
5.21pm
6 May 2018
meanmistermustard said
It’s a nice song overproduced but has good moments.I do adore the naked ‘Anthology’ take whilst the ‘Naked’ naked version is lame with a horrendously naff solo by Billy.
Yes, of the officially released Beatles’ versions of this song, the Anthology 3 version is definitely the one I prefer.
And in the end
The love you take is equal to the love you make
5.34pm
6 May 2018
William Shears Campbell said
@Dark Overlord, it has been brought up on this site before that Paul uses orchestras when he play TLAWR live despite disliking the addition of the orchestra in the recording. The spectulation is that he does that because that is how the official version of the song is and it is how most know the song.
It seems to me that major differences are that the Spector version has a choir of 14 female voices and harp notes at the end. Appropriate orchestration is fine, but the inclusion of a female choir and harp ending spoil the song for me. I enjoy this version by Paul.
The following people thank Richard for this post:
William Shears CampbellAnd in the end
The love you take is equal to the love you make
8.36am
14 June 2016
I respect what Paul says about the original intent of the song. But I still enjoy the LIB version.
1.The Beatles 2.Sgt. Pepper 3.Abbey Road 4.Magical Mystery Tour 5.Rubber Soul 6.Revolver 7.Help! 8.Let It Be
9.A Hard Day’s Night 10.Please Please Me 11.Beatles For Sale 12.With The Beatles 13.Yellow Submarine
Most Avid John Fan 2020 and 2021:
9.05am
30 April 2019
I’ve always thought the Anthology 3 version was the best. It’s the only one that truly lays the arrangement bare. The original album version has all the overdubs. And the “Naked” version sounds so f*****g techno for no reason. Like they were overproducing it to sound not overproduced. Paul’s vocal especially sounds so weird, and it’s obviously the mix itself and not how he sang it that makes it sound so weird. This issue taints every Naked song, and makes the album unlistenable for me. I’d take the original (overdubs and all) any day over that garbage.
2.24pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Kaniffee said
I’ve always thought the Anthology 3 version was the best. It’s the only one that truly lays the arrangement bare. The original album version has all the overdubs. And the “Naked” version sounds so f*****g techno for no reason. Like they were overproducing it to sound not overproduced. Paul’s vocal especially sounds so weird, and it’s obviously the mix itself and not how he sang it that makes it sound so weird. This issue taints every Naked song, and makes the album unlistenable for me. I’d take the original (overdubs and all) any day over that garbage.
Agree with you. I also find Preston’s solo on ‘Naked’ to be one of the weakest, crappiest and worst sounding on any Beatles recording; it borders on being unlistenable.
It also irritates me that Apple gave us the video version instead of the ‘naked’ track. That compilation is probably the one I detest the most, everything about it is utter bollocks.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Tangerine"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
4.23pm
1 December 2009
meanmistermustard said
Kaniffee said
I’ve always thought the Anthology 3 version was the best. It’s the only one that truly lays the arrangement bare. The original album version has all the overdubs. And the “Naked” version sounds so f*****g techno for no reason. Like they were overproducing it to sound not overproduced. Paul’s vocal especially sounds so weird, and it’s obviously the mix itself and not how he sang it that makes it sound so weird. This issue taints every Naked song, and makes the album unlistenable for me. I’d take the original (overdubs and all) any day over that garbage.
Agree with you. I also find Preston’s solo on ‘Naked’ to be one of the weakest, crappiest and worst sounding on any Beatles recording; it borders on being unlistenable.
Yeah, I don’t like that solo either, mercifully brief though it is – Spector drowning it out is one of his few moves I welcome. I wonder if Paul suggested those notes, or Billy?
GEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
4.28am
26 January 2017
For sure. Billy was talented as hell, but that timbre and style of playing just does not suit this song. I think the song deserved some sense of grandiosity, but it would have been much better served by live musicians playing with the band than what Spector did.
The following people thank QuarryMan for this post:
WigwamI've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
6.45pm
14 June 2016
I actually really like this song There are 4 “finalized” versions that I know of, meaning not live or outtake versions.
There is, of course, the OG version produced by Phil Spector on the Let It Be album. I think it satisfies my ears because it’s familiar. I’ve listened to this version of the song for most of my life. It holds a special place in my memories and reminds me of my introduction to the Beatles.
To contrast, there is the naked version on Let It Be … Naked. It sounds like the OG version stripped down, which I suppose was the point. The solo is the most noticeable difference, and I kinda like little simple keyboard solo. It adds to this version’s calmness. It is a very calming listen and is one of the tracks LIB …N actually got right.
Then there is the version form 1989 that appeared on the Flowers In The Dirt Japanese Tour Edition. It sounds like a halfway between the Spector version and the Naked version(which hadn’t come out yet but there were still stripped versions in existence as that was the base of the Spector version). It is a nice listen but after a few times through it kinda strikes me as the most boring of all 4 versions.
Then of course there is the infamous Give My Regards To Broad Street Version. I actually really enjoy this version. I actually go with George Harrison when it comes to GMRTBS. The movie sucks, but the album is pretty good. I love the saxophones and the mystic 80’s feel it gives off. It’s a neat different take on the song, and I don’t think it’s given enough attention. It also is the only version to have an intro before the singing setting a sort of jazzy mood before the vocals come in. The only criticism I have for this one is that the verses are switched around. It’s a minor nitpick, but I think it was an unnecessary change. Although I do kind of enjoy being greeted with “The wild and windy night” after the solo.
Anyway I have just been on a kick with this song and its different versions, and I thought I would post about it.
The following people thank William Shears Campbell for this post:
sigh butterflyHere | There | Everywhere
It's ya boi! The one and only Billy Shears (AKA Paul's Replacement)
"Sometimes I wish I was just George Harrison" - John Lennon
11.29pm
11 June 2015
The following people thank sigh butterfly for this post:
William Shears CampbellYou and I have memories
Longer than the road that stretches out ahead
12.13am
14 June 2016
Timothy said
I respect what Paul says about the original intent of the song. But I still enjoy the LIB version.
Still feel the same way. I like what Phil did with the official version.
The following people thank Timothy for this post:
Vera Chuck and Dave1.The Beatles 2.Sgt. Pepper 3.Abbey Road 4.Magical Mystery Tour 5.Rubber Soul 6.Revolver 7.Help! 8.Let It Be
9.A Hard Day’s Night 10.Please Please Me 11.Beatles For Sale 12.With The Beatles 13.Yellow Submarine
Most Avid John Fan 2020 and 2021:
12.41am
25 February 2020
Timothy said
Timothy said
I respect what Paul says about the original intent of the song. But I still enjoy the LIB version.
Still feel the same way. I like what Phil did with the official version.
same, that’s the version I prefer tbh
12.35pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
@William Shears Campbell,
For the officially released naked version of the original version you should seek out ‘Anthology 3 ‘ and not ‘Naked’ as it’s not naked on ‘Naked’. The ‘Naked’ album contains the film version hence the different solo.
t=100s&ab_channel=TheBeatles-Topic
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
sigh butterfly, Richard, William Shears Campbell, kelicopter"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
3.46pm
11 June 2015
8.14pm
6 May 2018
meanmistermustard said
@William Shears Campbell,For the officially released naked version of the original version you should seek out ‘Anthology 3 ‘ and not ‘Naked’ as it’s not naked on ‘Naked’. The ‘Naked’ album contains the film version hence the different solo.
t=100s&ab_channel=TheBeatles-Topic
The ‘Anthology 3 ‘ version is is my preferred version too (rather than the ‘LIB ‘ or ‘Naked’ versions).
The following people thank Richard for this post:
kelicopterAnd in the end
The love you take is equal to the love you make
5.40pm
7 November 2010
The OG Phil Spector version of this song is one of my least favourite Beatles songs ever. The Anthology 3 version is a definite improvement but even then, it just doesn’t do anything for me.
The following people thank kelicopter for this post:
The Hole Got Fixed, vonbontee, sigh butterflyI think it's great you're going through a phase,
and I'm awfully glad it'll all be over in a couple
of days
2020
4.01pm
2 May 2013
The sentiment of the song I love, but Spector really lays the production on with a trowel and then adds a heavy dose of cloying syrup. I can see why Paul complained. The orchestral arrangement is clunky, the female backing singers tending towards muzak. I like the simple Paul at the piano version in the film which is the most honest and beautiful and meets the ‘back to basics’ ethos perfectly, although either of the versions stripped of Spector’s meddling on Anthology 3 or …Naked I’ll happily take over the ‘official’ one. It’s why I struggle with All Things Must Pass – pretty much all great songs but sound like recorded in an echo chamber to their detriment. Early Takes Vol.1 is a breath of fresh air in comparison and shows the beauty of the songs. Spector was right for the early to mid 60’s but should have rested on his laurels long before he got chance to become involved with The Beatles IMO. George Martin was right – they should have put “Produced by George Martin, overproduced by Phil Spector” on the Let It Be cover.
The following people thank Old Soak for this post:
Ahhh Girl, Richard8.37am
4 February 2021
Love this song. Love the Spector treatment. Listening to the Naked version is like listening to a demo by comparison. Can’t see why people all of a sudden didn’t/don’t like strings on a Beatles track. Think they mean the choir. For me it’s epic. Huge fan of it.
The following people thank Paul Prole for this post:
Vera Chuck and Dave, sigh butterflyUnless Paul McCartney knocks on my door I am unlikely to be impressed.
2 Guest(s)