11.08am
26 January 2017
Zig said
This is one of my “on the fence” songs. I love the lyrics but, to me, there is an certain edge that is missing from the music. It lacks the “ooomph” that holds my interest. It’s as if Paul took some elevator Muzak and dubbed his vocals over it. On the positive side, the way he delivers the vocals in a few spots are quite impressive. In the context of the canon album, it does set the mood nicely for the next track (‘Flying ‘), but on its own, it just doesn’t grab me.
Rarely am I ever fascinating by the shifts between major and minor modes through the verse and chorus when I hear elevator music.
Best part of the song: “ooohhhhhhhhhhhhh round and round and round…”
The following people thank sir walter raleigh for this post:
Beatlebug, Vera Chuckandave, WeepingAtlasCedars"The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles!"
-Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues
"We could ride and surf together while our love would grow"
-Brian Wilson, Surfer Girl
11.20am
Moderators
15 February 2015
not-so-@sir walter raleigh* said
Rarely am I ever fascinating by the shifts between major and minor modes through the verse and chorus when I hear elevator music.
The following people emphatically express their profound appreciation for this post: @Beatlebug, @Beatlebug, @Beatlebug
*this makes more sense when viewed in HTML posting
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
1.03pm
8 January 2015
Another nice cover, great chords:
I'm like Necko only I'm a bassist ukulele guitar synthesizer kazoo penguin and also everyone. Or is everyone me? Now I'm a confused bassist ukulele guitar synthesizer kazoo penguin everyone who is definitely not @Joe. This has been true for 2016 & 2017 but I may have to get more specific in the future.
1.53pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Zig said
This is one of my “on the fence” songs. I love the lyrics but, to me, there is an certain edge that is missing from the music. It lacks the “ooomph” that holds my interest. It’s as if Paul took some elevator Muzak and dubbed his vocals over it. On the positive side, the way he delivers the vocals in a few spots are quite impressive. In the context of the canon album, it does set the mood nicely for the next track (‘Flying ‘), but on its own, it just doesn’t grab me.
I go with this. The song has its moments but not enough for a standout in the catalogue.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Zig"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
5.42pm
15 May 2015
meanmistermustard said
I go with this. The song has its moments but not enough for a standout in the catalogue.
This is one of the Paul songs that fits a subcategory I call the “flat affect songs” — along with I Will , Yesterday , And I Love Her , Michelle , For No One . The only one of the list where his quasi-monotone delivery doesn’t work for me is Yesterday . I think it fits perfectly Fool On The Hill, however (as well as all the others on the list).
I almost included Here, There And Everywhere ; except that somehow the content of the lyrics and the spirit of the song convey more of a peace of mind radiating out of the simple beauty of love (which can in tone resemble a flat affect).
The following people thank Pineapple Records for this post:
BeatlebugA ginger sling with a pineapple heart,
a coffee dessert, yes you know it's good news...
4.23pm
6 July 2016
I kind of get what you’re saying about “flat effect” but I couldn’t imagine those songs delivered in any other way. That’s to say Paul sang them in a perfect way that suited them. I mean I couldn’t imaging Here There And Everywhere sung the same way he sang LongTall Sally.
The following people thank Leppo for this post:
Beatlebug, Pineapple Records, ZigPivotal Moments in Beatles History No.118: Yoko helps herself to one of George's digestives.
4.41pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Leppo said
I kind of get what you’re saying about “flat effect” but I couldn’t imagine those songs delivered in any other way. That’s to say Paul sang them in a perfect way that suited them. I mean I couldn’t imaging Here There And Everywhere sung the same way he sang LongTall Sally.
I think that’s what Funny Pineapple was saying… wasn’t it?
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Pineapple Records([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
11.11pm
15 May 2015
Leppo said
I kind of get what you’re saying about “flat effect” but I couldn’t imagine those songs delivered in any other way. That’s to say Paul sang them in a perfect way that suited them. I mean I couldn’t imaging Here There And Everywhere sung the same way he sang LongTall Sally.
Yes, Beatlebug is correct. (Although I don’t think Yesterday works with that flat affect; i think a more rugged, world-weary voice would be better — of the Beatles, John is the only one who could maybe pull it off). Otherwise, I like Paul’s flat affect style for those other songs. I just thought of another which, again, works well: “Junk”
The following people thank Pineapple Records for this post:
BeatlebugA ginger sling with a pineapple heart,
a coffee dessert, yes you know it's good news...
6.30am
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Leppo said
I kind of get what you’re saying about “flat effect” but I couldn’t imagine those songs delivered in any other way. That’s to say Paul sang them in a perfect way that suited them. I mean I couldn’t imaging Here There And Everywhere sung the same way he sang LongTall Sally.
Same. For me, the lyrics themselves and the way he delivers them outweighs my disappointment over the musical arrangement. It’s not terrible, it just lacks something I can’t put my fingers on.
The following people thank Zig for this post:
Vera ChuckandaveTo the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
12.40pm
26 January 2017
Zig said
Same. For me, the lyrics themselves and the way he delivers them outweighs my disappointment over the musical arrangement. It’s not terrible, it just lacks something I can’t put my fingers on.
For me, it is the opposite. The arrangement HAS that something I can’t put my finger on.
The following people thank sir walter raleigh for this post:
Beatlebug, Zig, Vera Chuckandave, WeepingAtlasCedars"The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles!"
-Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues
"We could ride and surf together while our love would grow"
-Brian Wilson, Surfer Girl
12.49pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Zig said
For me, the lyrics themselves and the way he delivers them outweighs my disappointment over the musical arrangement. It’s not terrible, it just lacks something I can’t put my fingers on.
sir walter raleigh said
For me, it is the opposite. The arrangement HAS that something I can’t put my finger on.
So we agree, it’s a Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup song.
It’s the peanut butter!
It’s the chocolate!
It’s just plain good…
The following people thank Zig for this post:
sir walter raleigh, Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedarsTo the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
1.19pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
I like Reese’s.
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Zig, Father McKenzie, WeepingAtlasCedars([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
3.19pm
14 November 2017
3.51pm
9 December 2017
4.10pm
9 December 2017
sir walter raleigh said
For me, it is the opposite. The arrangement HAS that something I can’t put my finger on.
Yes.. the change from the minor to major key is wonderful and what makes it even better for me is the fact that it is a lovely major 6th chord it returns to….one note making such a difference….
The following people thank Vera Chuckandave for this post:
BeatlebugAnd my bird can't sing......!!
1 Guest(s)