9.42pm
5 February 2010
I was monkeying around with the individual tracks on the Sgt Pepper Reprise and I noticed this weird bit of banter between John and Paul right before the vocals kick in. It must have been really buried in the mix, because I can’t hear it on the album version, no matter how hard I strain my ears. Anyway, I thought it was fun, so I’m sharing it here:
Not a bit like Cagney.
10.10pm
20 December 2010
That version with the chatter is only available on the mono pressing of Sgt. Pepper . The Stereo version does not have it.
If you like that kind of stuff, play the entire album along with the White Album . Both of those have the most difference between mono and stereo copies.
The further one travels, the less one knows
10.38pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
The Rock Band multi’s and isolated channels of the 5.1 mixes are great for hearing isolated words and sounds that otherwise were buried. Its quite amazing how much was put into songs that sound quite straight-forward. There is a tinkling bell going off throughout All Together Now i never noticed until hearing it isolated. Only A Northern Song is complete chaos with all thats going on (rambling chatter, piano’s being played without much thought on what exactly) – and you get to hear Paul’s shocking dreadful trumpet playing in all its glory, and its quite fun hearing it being so awful.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
11.13pm
11 November 2010
PeterWeatherby said
I was monkeying around with the individual tracks on the Sgt Pepper Reprise and I noticed this weird bit of banter between John and Paul right before the vocals kick in. It must have been really buried in the mix, because I can’t hear it on the album version, no matter how hard I strain my ears. Anyway, I thought it was fun, so I’m sharing it here:
That’s interesting. Thanks for sharing!
I'm Necko. I'm like Ringo except I wear necklaces.
I'm also ewe2 on weekends.
Most likely to post things that make you go hmm... 2015, 2016, 2017.
11.26pm
1 November 2012
12.02am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Works for me. Pretty interesting stuff. Their voices are so good!
Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
Thanks! I’d never heard that before. Is it possible to isolate Paul’s shouting at the end? I’ve always wondered what he says.
Can buy me love! Please consider supporting the Beatles Bible on Amazon
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs
Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!
2.17pm
5 February 2010
Joe said
Thanks! I’d never heard that before. Is it possible to isolate Paul’s shouting at the end? I’ve always wondered what he says.
No, unfortunately, it sounds like they were all recording on the same mic/track for that one. This is what I hear at the end, though:
All (singing): … hearts … club … band
Paul: Wooo!
John: Oooh … oh my God , it kills me
George (singing): band-band-band, band, band, band
You weren’t, by chance, thinking of the song “Hey Bulldog ,” were you?
Not a bit like Cagney.
1.41pm
28 January 2013
8.18pm
12 December 2019
12.15pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
BeatOfTheBrass said
It is cute when John dashes-in on the right channel (on the stereo) and says:”byyeee”.
Which is the second song on the album where John says “bye”’, the first being ‘She’s Leaving Home’, conveniently also the second last song on the side.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
The Hole Got Fixed"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
8.52am
2 May 2013
How plausible is the possibility that Sgt Pepper (Reprise) contains backwards lyrics deliberately?
Did THE BEATLES Backmask an Entire Song? Discover the Hidden Track on Sgt Pepper! – YouTube
7.32pm
1 December 2009
Old Soak said
How plausible is the possibility that Sgt Pepper (Reprise) contains backwards lyrics deliberately?
I don’t find it plausible at all, reversed result sounds something closer to “…facE mishnaS” than “fake mustache” to my ears. And the detail about Paul going incognito in France is irrelevant, since this hypothetical “fake moustache” could as easily refer to the cardboard one included with the album.
I wonder: Has anybody recording artist, in either rock or avant-garde music, ever experimented with this sort of laborious deliberate backwards messaging? Like a) compose lyric, b) record lyric and play tape backwards, c) try to transcribe what the backwards tape seems to say, and d) record these new words/sounds onto tape, so the original lyrics will be re-approximated if *that* recording is played backwards. Lot of work! I imagine it’s been done, even if only experimentally.
The following people thank vonbontee for this post:
Sea Belt, RubeGEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
5.32am
7 November 2022
vonbontee said
Old Soak said
How plausible is the possibility that Sgt Pepper (Reprise) contains backwards lyrics deliberately?
I don’t find it plausible at all, reversed result sounds something closer to “…facE mishnaS” than “fake mustache” to my ears. And the detail about Paul going incognito in France is irrelevant, since this hypothetical “fake moustache” could as easily refer to the cardboard one included with the album.
I wonder: Has anybody recording artist, in either rock or avant-garde music, ever experimented with this sort of laborious deliberate backwards messaging? Like a) compose lyric, b) record lyric and play tape backwards, c) try to transcribe what the backwards tape seems to say, and d) record these new words/sounds onto tape, so the original lyrics will be re-approximated if *that* recording is played backwards. Lot of work! I imagine it’s been done, even if only experimentally.
David Lynch taught his actors to speak backwards, then for the film he replayed it in reverse so they sounded un-reversed (but in a weirdly stilted way).
The following people thank Sea Belt for this post:
vonbonteeNow today I find, you have changed your mind
1.39pm
14 June 2016
Some of the best rock music from the Beatles is found in this track, particularly the start with Ringo’s drumming.
The following people thank Timothy for this post:
Rube, Shamrock Womlbs1.The Beatles 2.Sgt. Pepper 3.Abbey Road 4.Magical Mystery Tour 5.Rubber Soul 6.Revolver 7.Help! 8.Let It Be
9.A Hard Day’s Night 10.Please Please Me 11.Beatles For Sale 12.With The Beatles 13.Yellow Submarine
Most Avid John Fan 2020 and 2021:
3.46pm
1 December 2009
Sea Belt said
vonbontee said
Old Soak said
How plausible is the possibility that Sgt Pepper (Reprise) contains backwards lyrics deliberately?
I don’t find it plausible at all, reversed result sounds something closer to “…facE mishnaS” than “fake mustache” to my ears. And the detail about Paul going incognito in France is irrelevant, since this hypothetical “fake moustache” could as easily refer to the cardboard one included with the album.
I wonder: Has anybody recording artist, in either rock or avant-garde music, ever experimented with this sort of laborious deliberate backwards messaging? Like a) compose lyric, b) record lyric and play tape backwards, c) try to transcribe what the backwards tape seems to say, and d) record these new words/sounds onto tape, so the original lyrics will be re-approximated if *that* recording is played backwards. Lot of work! I imagine it’s been done, even if only experimentally.
David Lynch taught his actors to speak backwards, then for the film he replayed it in reverse so they sounded un-reversed (but in a weirdly stilted way
Ooh, you’re right, thanks! (I never did see “Twin Peaks”, but I remember “The SSimpsons few years afterward doing a parody of that backwards-dream bit.)
The following people thank vonbontee for this post:
Sea Belt, RubeGEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
1.31am
7 November 2022
@vonbontee — I imagine pulling this off with music + lyrics would probably be more difficult than just an actor speaking lines. On the other hand, I don’t think the Beatles first recorded backwards then reversed the playback, as Lynch did.
The following people thank Sea Belt for this post:
Rube, Von BonteeNow today I find, you have changed your mind
8.30pm
14 December 2009
Sea Belt said
@vonbontee — I imagine pulling this off with music + lyrics would probably be more difficult than just an actor speaking lines. On the other hand, I don’t think the Beatles first recorded backwards then reversed the playback, as Lynch did.
No, the Beatles never seem to have done that….but there’s, really, very little reversed vocals at all in the Beatles canon – all I can think of are “Rain ” and the bits in “Blue Jay Way “.
Incidentally, here’s a little Beatles remix thing I constructed years ago with audio software, using the rhythm track from “Reprise” plus a whole bunch of other isolated tracks from 1967; it’s got bits from every one of “Sgt. Pepper ‘s” titles (as well as the inner groove, backwards and forwards) and is about two minutes long, so I named it “Two Minute Pepper”
The following people thank Von Bontee for this post:
Richard, Rube, Sea Belt, Mr. Moonlight, sir walter raleighPaul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
1 Guest(s)