6.06am
14 June 2016
JW OBoogie said
Paul was the major showman and John the major emotionalist. Both versions would be amazing for what each bring to them.
Yeah. Paul’s version is all we know, and I do love it. John has plenty of other songs with great vocals. Oh Darling is Paul’s.
1.The Beatles 2.Sgt. Pepper 3.Abbey Road 4.Magical Mystery Tour 5.Rubber Soul 6.Revolver 7.Help! 8.Let It Be
9.A Hard Day’s Night 10.Please Please Me 11.Beatles For Sale 12.With The Beatles 13.Yellow Submarine
Most Avid John Fan 2020 and 2021:
10.58am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
I wonder what Paul would have thought if John had done a cover of this song.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
Von Bontee, Beatlebug, Vera Chuck and DaveCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
12.11pm
14 December 2009
He’d have been thrilled! Chuffed.
I continue to dream of a take of the song in which both Paul and John sing the bridge (or at least its repeat) together in unison! Like really howl it out together, as in “You know my NAAME!” or “…Allll/I want/Is you!”, something with that concentrated MacLen-ergy and mccartneylennon-tensity. And I continue to dream…
The following people thank Von Bontee for this post:
Ahhh Girl, BeatlebugPaul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
2.31am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
I think it would depend on the circumstances. If John had done a version and made a lot of having done it to prove his opinion that if Paul had had any sense he would have given the vocal to him because his voice was more naturally suited to it, it would have been another bone of contention. At the height of their troubles Paul may well have taken it as an attack on his vocals.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Ahhh Girl, CakeMaestor, Beatlebug"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
10.18pm
14 June 2016
12.36am
25 February 2020
I didn’t know I wanted that to be a thing, that would’ve been great
one of the more underrated songs on Abbey Road imo
4.50pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Paul and John’s duet, which is on ‘Anthology 3 ‘, is spectacular; their harmonies are some of the best they did.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Timothy, sir walter raleigh, Bongo, Vera Chuck and Dave"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
8.03pm
28 March 2014
7.22am
24 March 2014
meanmistermustard said
Paul and John’s duet, which is on ‘Anthology 3 ‘, is spectacular; their harmonies are some of the best they did.
Such a wave of joy
The following people thank Shamrock Womlbs for this post:
Rube"I Need You by George Harrison"
5.49am
23 January 2022
I came to this thread wondering if anyone else hears “oh Johnny” around 1:43, glad I’m not alone @Shamrock Womlbs 🙂
Reading it has given me a very interesting thought to ponder though. I think Paul has always instinctively protected his voice. There are loads of clips of John’s voice cut to pieces, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard Paul’s voice showing much strain. Anyway, my new theory is: this is something people hold against Paul as a singer and as a person. He protects himself. You often hear things like “John is emotional and Paul is technically good” which has always struck me as odd. Paul’s vocal performances are frequently *incredible* and carry a lot of emotional weight, but he does know how to protect his voice. He’s always done this in interviews too.
What do you think? Am I overthinking this?
The following people thank meaigs for this post:
Shamrock Womlbs, Mr. MoonlightMy hot take is that after the Beatles split they went down the paths of spiritualism, solipsism, alcoholism, and Paul McCartney
-- Jason Carty, Nothing is Real podcast
11.23am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
@meaigs https://www.beatlesbible.com/f…..2/#p226127 and keep reading posts on that page for a taste of true Paulette style
Somewhat related https://www.beatlesbible.com/f…..technique/
Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
11.46am
23 January 2022
Ahhh Girl said
@meaigs https://www.beatlesbible.com/f…..2/#p226127 and keep reading posts on that page for a taste of true Paulette style
The following people thank meaigs for this post:
Ahhh GirlMy hot take is that after the Beatles split they went down the paths of spiritualism, solipsism, alcoholism, and Paul McCartney
-- Jason Carty, Nothing is Real podcast
5.16am
14 June 2016
Bongo said
One of Paul’s best screamers
It sure is. I play this song when I’m feeling down about love and need to let out that specific emotion.
1.The Beatles 2.Sgt. Pepper 3.Abbey Road 4.Magical Mystery Tour 5.Rubber Soul 6.Revolver 7.Help! 8.Let It Be
9.A Hard Day’s Night 10.Please Please Me 11.Beatles For Sale 12.With The Beatles 13.Yellow Submarine
Most Avid John Fan 2020 and 2021:
5.25pm
30 August 2021
meaigs said
Anyway, my new theory is: this is something people hold against Paul as a singer and as a person. He protects himself. You often hear things like “John is emotional and Paul is technically good” which has always struck me as odd. Paul’s vocal performances are frequently *incredible* and carry a lot of emotional weight, but he does know how to protect his voice. He’s always done this in interviews too.What do you think? Am I overthinking this?
I think that’s true. Even when Paul sings in the first person he seems to be at something of a remove. Subsequently I’ve read how certain songs were inspired by his mother, or were about Linda or Jane Asher, but he still never seems to wear his heart on his sleeve as obviously as John did.
"Nothing is Beatle-proof."
4.56pm
23 January 2022
meaigs said
I came to this thread wondering if anyone else hears “oh Johnny” around 1:43, glad I’m not alone @Shamrock Womlbs 🙂Reading it has given me a very interesting thought to ponder though. I think Paul has always instinctively protected his voice. There are loads of clips of John’s voice cut to pieces, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard Paul’s voice showing much strain. Anyway, my new theory is: this is something people hold against Paul as a singer and as a person. He protects himself. You often hear things like “John is emotional and Paul is technically good” which has always struck me as odd. Paul’s vocal performances are frequently *incredible* and carry a lot of emotional weight, but he does know how to protect his voice. He’s always done this in interviews too.
What do you think? Am I overthinking this?
I just found this article which perfectly captures what I was trying to get at here
https://www.heydullblog.com/pa…..rt-report/
I love this quote:
This photo captures the way McCartney both courts the public’s eye and wants to retreat from it. It IS his public presentation: jokey and theatrical on the surface, defensive underneath. He’s happy to give an audience what it wants, but he’s going to be cagey about what he discloses. He’s basically at ease with being a performer, in a traditional rock-as-showbiz sense, as John Lennon wasn’t. And part of being a performer is never fully lowering that velvet jacket. Playing it safe in this way often gets McCartney labeled “insincere,” but I think it’s intelligently self-protective.
The following people thank meaigs for this post:
Ahhh Girl, Rube, Mr. MoonlightMy hot take is that after the Beatles split they went down the paths of spiritualism, solipsism, alcoholism, and Paul McCartney
-- Jason Carty, Nothing is Real podcast
2 Guest(s)