2.21am
13 May 2014
Hey y’all. I’m an audio engineer and one of my favorite hobbies is to screw with Beatles tunes in digital editors because Beatles music is so clean and consistently mixed since the 2009 remasters. However, I’ve noticed something bizarre:
If you place the raw WAVE files for the Revolver 2009 stereo remaster of “Eleanor Rigby ” and the Anthology 2 “strings only” versions in the same file, they initially sync up perfectly, as I would expect from Beatles recordings. However, the two tracks quickly fall noticeably out of sync and when looking at the end of the files, the two have a roughly one second difference. This has obvious implications regarding the quality of the tape playback during remastering (i.e. either it was slow for Anthology or fast for 2009 remasters).
Furthermore, when I compared the strings to the original CD stereo master of Revolver (American tracklisting circa 1980s), the same thing happened. I also compared the file lengths of the 2009 remaster and ’80s original master (both stereo): 2009 is shorter than ’80s master by about .08 seconds, though I assume this was to correct a mastering speed error introduced to the original CD master.
Given that both Revolver s have files with only negligible differences in length, I’m going to assume Anthology was mastered slow. Possible explanations I can think of are:
- The strings were originally recorded at that speed, but sped up slightly when the Beatles’ overdubs were added, possibly to better match pitch
- There was a mastering error with the original LP, which recorded too fast and the “strings only” is the original recording speed
- There was simply a speed error when mastering Anthology, though this seems unthinkable with George Martin at the helm of the original equipment
But, I’d rather know than assume, so if anyone can shed some light, I would greatly appreciate it. And sorry that this is so verbose.
EDIT: Just want to clarify that by length, I mean from start of signal to end of signal, with all silence (~60dB and under) removed.
BTW, I searched the forum for this and found nothing. If I’m repeating an already-existing thread, kindly direct me there!
2.25am
Reviewers
1 November 2013
I’m not hugely knowledgable here at all. In fact, I know nothing. I’d just like to welcome you and encourage you to stick around, introduce yourself, and have some discussions!
Oh, have you tried matching the Yellow Submarine Songtrack version? That’s probably a different length seeing as it was remixed, but just a suggestion.
(This signature brought to you by Net Boy and Net Girl. Putting messages in modems since 1996.)
That’s really interesting. I have no idea why there might be a difference, but my guess would be Anthology has the strings at their original recording speed.
Can buy me love! Please consider supporting the Beatles Bible on Amazon
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs
Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!
2.27pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
On our Fab Four Taxi Tour on Monday, we obviously took in St. Peter’s Church, and its churchyard.
And a “can’t miss” is obviously Eleanor’s gravestone.
And then our excellent driver, Ian Doyle (Dear Prudence ), asked myself, @Ahhh Girl and @fabfouremily to look closely at Eleanor’s inscription, and see if we noticed anything strange about it, about its wording, and an echo in the song. So we looked:
Ian pointed out something about it that none of us had noticed. Can you see it?
…Rigby
…wife of Thomas Woods
Why isn’t she Eleanor Woods? It’s 1939! A woman keeping her own name after marriage was… I would say unheard of, but obviously…
And then in the song:
Eleanor Rigby died…
…and was buried along with her name…
Isn’t that exactly what we see on the gravestone, an Eleanor Rigby who was buried along with her name, not her husband’s.
Thanks to Ian for this observation.
What do you think?
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Tuesday, Beatlebug, Ahhh Girl, Matt Busby, Into the Sky with Diamonds"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
2.54pm
21 April 2015
11.36am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Eleanor Rigby reincarnated in McCartney’s imagination:
Well, well, take off your face
Recover from the trip you’ve been on
from Hi, Hi, Hi
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
Beatlebug, Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
8.00pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
8.51pm
11 November 2010
Zig said
Ron Nasty said
John was born 364 days after she died…unless 1940 was a Leap Year.
Actually, 1940 WAS a leap year.
The following people thank Necko for this post:
Ahhh Girl, Zig, Bongo, BeatlebugI'm Necko. I'm like Ringo except I wear necklaces.
I'm also ewe2 on weekends.
Most likely to post things that make you go hmm... 2015, 2016, 2017.
7.08am
Reviewers
14 April 2010
1.13pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Apparently there’s an Eleanor Rigby statue plaque in Liverpool (I did not know this), because it’s been stolen.
Who would do such a thing? Ugh, humans.
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
1.27pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Probably taken as a prank as any sell on value would be negligible due to its distinct nature – orr to order but who would want a statue in their house? Humans do strange things, in actuality we are often very stupid.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
1.31pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
meanmistermustard pointed out
<snip snack> Humans do strange things, in actuality we are often very stupid.
Very twoo.
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
natureaker([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
7.42pm
20 January 2016
10.48am
6 July 2016
I have a “mad” theory about this song. Is it really likely that Paul would name the main character in his song for it to coincidentally match a name in the churchyard – a site of central importance to Beatles history where he and John first met? If the name was Elizabeth Smith I could accept it but Eleanor Rigby is not such a common name.
My theory is that Paul knew about the gravestone but wouldn’t own up to it because of any repercussions. Added to this is the fact that Paul made a visit to his Dad’s house (a short distance away) a few months before the recording commenced for Revolver (the scooter accident happened on this trip). We know he had the structure of the song about a churchyard in place. is it possible he found some extra inspiration perhaps on one of his scooter trips? Paul said he was showing his friend Tara Browne around some of the sights in Liverpool. (It’s perhaps ironic that Tara would himself provide some lyrical inspiration for a Beatles song). I might be jumping to conclusions but to me it seems more likely than a coincidence.
Pivotal Moments in Beatles History No.118: Yoko helps herself to one of George's digestives.
12.57pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Ahhh Girl said
Eleanor Rigby reincarnated in McCartney’s imagination:Well, well, take off your face
Recover from the trip you’ve been onfrom Hi, Hi, Hi
I always think of ‘Another Day ‘ as a ‘prequel’ to Eleanor Rigby .
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Zig, Into the Sky with Diamonds, vonbontee([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
5.19pm
3 November 2015
8.29pm
10 August 2011
@Ron Nasty Love that anecdote. Certainly “explains” things – even if it’s just a coincidence.
"Into the Sky with Diamonds" (the Beatles and the Race to the Moon – a history)
7.00am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
I would have thought that a song about lonely people would be slow and lethargic sounding. But, Eleanor Rigby has such a manic, sit-up-and-pay-attention, hard-driving sound. The incongruity messes with my brain. Don’t get me wrong though; I adore the song.
There is an urgency to it.
Note: Originally posted on AD40’s backup forum during the Time of Trials BB forum wierdness where we were all shown as logged in as each other. Hopefully the forum cache on the server is now sorted out and the lockdown is over.
Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
7.06am
1 November 2013
8.36am
6 July 2016
Ahhh Girl said
I would have thought that a song about lonely people would be slow and lethargic sounding. But, Eleanor Rigby has such a manic, sit-up-and-pay-attention, hard-driving sound. The incongruity messes with my brain. Don’t get me wrong though; I adore the song.There is an urgency to it.
<End of Quote>
I heard a suggestion that George Martin’s string arrangement was influenced by Bernard Herrmann’s Psycho score. There is definitely a resemblance.
The following people thank Leppo for this post:
Ahhh GirlPivotal Moments in Beatles History No.118: Yoko helps herself to one of George's digestives.
1 Guest(s)