11.16am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
You goofball, @Into the Sky with Diamonds. I vote “no” to Paul going quickly in a sticky way to get his rankings up.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
Into the Sky with Diamonds, trcanberra, ewe2Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
4.44pm
Reviewers
29 August 2013
“Well that brings up a good point: what does it take for a song to be considered a classic?”
Indeed @Into the Sky with Diamonds , I would consider Michelle a classic, but I just never thought of Fool in the same vein. It does have more cover versions than I thought but then many Beatles songs may be in that category as well.
Thanks for the interesting post, good reading.
==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (married for those not in the know!) <==
5.38pm
8 January 2015
I had the Sérgio Mendes version of Fool stuck in my brain as a child, so I think that’s possibly a reason why I recognise it as a standard, but don’t really like the original that much. It lends itself so much to jazzy/soul/funky interpretations.
The following people thank ewe2 for this post:
trcanberra, Into the Sky with DiamondsI'm like Necko only I'm a bassist ukulele guitar synthesizer kazoo penguin and also everyone. Or is everyone me? Now I'm a confused bassist ukulele guitar synthesizer kazoo penguin everyone who is definitely not @Joe. This has been true for 2016 & 2017 but I may have to get more specific in the future.
8.01pm
27 July 2014
Although I didn’t get a chance to vote, I liked the list overall. I agree John and George were strongly represented at the top at the expense of Paul, but I disagree it is purely because Sir Paul is alive. His greatest songs (Penny Lane , Let it Be, Eleanor Rigby , Hey Jude ) have great gravitas and lasting power, but overall he just wasn’t the visionary that John was. Those great Paul songs came in very high in the poll, appropriately so.
Paul was clearly the best overall musician in the band, had a great sense for melody and arrangement, and could even write a great lyric, but there is nothing in Paul’s canon that compares , IMO, to just 3 songs from 1967: Strawberry Fields, I Am The Walrus (surprisingly ranked very low at 25), and A Day In The Life (partially Paul, but mostly a John song). And Lucy and Mr. Kite are no slouches either. And then, in just 2 years, John had changed completely and was doing Cold Turkey , then Plastic Ono Band and Instant Karma . Challenging, difficult and complex work, the work of a great artist. No matter how much I like Obladi and Good Day Sunshine , and I love both songs, they lack that spark. They are great pop songs, great standards, technically perfect, but still something separates them from Strawberry Fields. Thankfully, the poll appropriately ranked Walrus much higher than its pleasant but entirely lightweight A side, Hello Goodbye .
All the Beatles evolved, but from the beginning, John was always an innovator and that is why, IMHO, the BB members ranked his greatest songs so highly. And I do think Because and Dear Prudence belong high in the poll, maybe not so high. Both great John songs with amazing contributions by Paul. So they fed off each other, but John is appropriately lauded, and not just because of his early and untimely demise.
Also, George developed later as a songwriter, as he was younger than he others. His later work with the Beatles is phenomenal, and appropriately highly ranked. Most of All Things Must Pass should have been recorded by the Beatles, if John and Paul could have hung up their egos for a minute. Sour Milk Sea was a great song, tragically never properly recorded by the Beatles. If they had, that would have been in the top 50 of this poll, IMO.
If there is another poll, I and other newer members can have our say and we will see if things change.
Thanks @IveJustSeenAFaceo and @AhhhGirl and others for this poll, a very interesting exercise. Ranking Beatles songs is tough, because they are all so great!
The following people thank A Serviceable Villain for this post:
Ahhh Girl, trcanberra, Into the Sky with Diamonds8.11pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Thanks for chipping in your thoughts about the results, @A Serviceable Villain. I think RN and AD40 are close to having the new poll ready to go.
To notify me, use cbatcu after the @. Here’s a list of other forumpudlians whose @ name is different than the screen name they use now. https://www.beatlesbible.com/f…..ion-names/
Here’s the “why” about that … some people, like me, changed their user name sometime after makng their account. Unfortunately, the @ name doesn’t change.
Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
8.23pm
27 July 2014
6.46am
10 August 2011
A Serviceable Villain said, “he just wasn’t the visionary that John was.”
Lennon was a genius, no doubt – but I don’t see him as a visionary. A visionary consciously has a novel view of what the future could or should be. Henry Ford was a visionary as was Steve Jobs. In music you could point to Leo Fender, Les Paul, and Moog.
The Beatles (including Lennon) wrote about what came to their minds in approximately the style of the day (though much louder and much better).
You don’t hear people say, Lennon, what a ground-breaking guy: A Hard Day’s Night , If I Fell , etc….
So what happened in 1967? More powerful drugs! The inside of Lennon’s brain must have looked like one of those psychedelic posters. Dreamy. Colorful. Laid back. And the music reflected that: Strawberry Fields, Lucy in the sky, I Am The Walrus …
LSD may have messed up his personal life but it sure was great for his music!
Then came the painful break-up … with the drugs, and the deep self analysis, and you got … jagged hard-edged music: Cold Turkey
So yes, Lennon was a genius. (That’s another term often thrown around like it’s a little gold star. But Lennon was the real deal). Even in his day he was seen that way. And, yes, he introduced psychedelic music to the world. And yes, he gave the Beatles yet another dimension that kept them moving forward. (But he who giveth taketh away…) But ‘visionary’ I see as one accolade too many.
The following people thank Into the Sky with Diamonds for this post:
Beatlebug, trcanberra"Into the Sky with Diamonds" (the Beatles and the Race to the Moon – a history)
12.41pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Full details of “The Beatles Bible 2015 Canon Poll” will be announced in a new thread on Monday 18 May by myself and @Starr Shine?.
This will remain the discussion thread for it.
“The Beatles Bible 2015 Canon Poll” will be followed, at the beginning of next year, by “The Beatles Bible 2016 Non-Canon Poll”.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Ahhh Girl, Beatlebug, Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<, Into the Sky with Diamonds"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
2.43pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
I cannot wait for more discussions on what makes a song part of the cannon (and what the cannon actually is and who decides) and the repercussions such views have on the remaining excluded numbers.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
8.46am
27 March 2015
Well, I’m terrible at choosing and drawing lines. So I’d be one of those people saying all song recorded by the Beatles should be considered part of the ‘canon’. Unlike many people here, I believe Free As A Bird and Real Love count a Beatles songs too. But like I said: I hate choosing.
Formerly Known As JPM-Fangirl -- 2016
'Out There' - 07-06-2015 - Ziggo Dome Amsterdam -- 'One On One' - 12-06-2016 - Pinkpop Festival Landgraaf
9.32am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
I’ve been thinking about the the arguments over “canon” that we had last time. I think the problem came because the last poll was labeled as “ultimate” but didn’t include all of the songs. At least this time, there is no pretense of “ultimate” being thrown about. It is going to be just as prescribed; the defining limits are being stated up front.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
BeatlebugCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
10.02am
Moderators
15 February 2015
@meanmistermustard stood head in hand and turned to face the wall
I cannot wait for more discussions on what makes a song part of the cannon (and what the cannon actually is and who decides) and the repercussions such views have on the remaining excluded numbers.
Is there such a thread in existence? Or was this thread utilised (read: derailed)?
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
10.11am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Ahhh Girl said
I’ve been thinking about the the arguments over “canon” that we had last time. I think the problem came because the last poll was labeled as “ultimate” but didn’t include all of the songs. At least this time, there is no pretense of “ultimate” being thrown about. It is going to be just as prescribed; the defining limits are being stated up front.
But who determines what those limits are and why are they set that way? Some folk see every single song ever released under the name Beatles from ‘That’ll Be The Day’ thru to ‘Real Love ‘ as being part of the canon whilst others view the canon as being everything released between ‘Love Me Do ‘ thru to ‘You Know My Name (Look Up The Number). Just because one person (or two) says this is the canon doesnt remove the potential for another to say “no its not”.
I’m not looking for an argument, just seeing the potential for another debate.
Silly Girl said
@meanmistermustard stood head in hand and turned to face the wall
I cannot wait for more discussions on what makes a song part of the cannon (and what the cannon actually is and who decides) and the repercussions such views have on the remaining excluded numbers.Is there such a thread in existence? Or was this thread utilised (read: derailed)?
Here is the thread on that discussion but its also part of the thread you are in if you go back thru it.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Beatlebug"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
10.20am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Maybe we should take the word “canon” totally out of the picture and just say we are voting on these songs (then list them)… I’m just fishing for a way to stop the ache before it begins. If that is even possible.
Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
10.22am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Ahhh Girl said
Maybe we should take the word “canon” totally out of the picture and just say we are voting on these songs (then list them)… I’m just fishing for a way to stop the ache before it begins. If that is even possible.
Agreed.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
10.27am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Oooo, @Joe and I used the words fish and fishing within 10 minutes of each other. I hadn’t seen his post in the Pet Peeves thread when I used it. Don’t know why this fascinates me. It just does.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
BeatlebugCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
10.30am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Ahhh Girl said
Oooo, @Joe and I used the words fish and fishing within 10 minutes of each other. I hadn’t seen his post in the Pet Peeves thread when I used it. Don’t know why this fascinates me. It just does.
@Ahhh Girl, what has the above got to do with the conversation in this thread?
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
10.36am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Oops, I meant to be writing that in impossible to derail. How did I get it here?
Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
10.41am
Moderators
15 February 2015
@Ahhh Girl said
Oops, I meant to be writing that in impossible to derail. How did I get it here?
That can be mod-ified
yah yah so punny right?
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Starr Shine?([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
10.42am
1 November 2013
Silly Girl said
@Ahhh Girl said
Oops, I meant to be writing that in impossible to derail. How did I get it here?That can be mod-ified
yah yah so punny right?
Impossible! After the mod blight of 1845 posts are now sticky glued to threads forever!
If you can't log in and can't use the forum go here and someone will help you out.
2 Guest(s)