1.27am
1 November 2012
The specific skill/talent I’m referring to I’ve never heard or read anyone else mention: When they sing “hand” they hit 3 notes in quick succession going down — “ha-a-and”.
It’s relatively easier to do that when the syllables have a consonant in front of it, like “wa-wa-wa” or “doo-doo-doo” or “la-la-la”.
But in this song, they are doing it with only an “h” on the first syllable (which is more difficult to jump off of than other consonants), and no consonants at all for the 2nd and 3rd syllables.
I try to sing that and I just can’t do it. I’m not a professional singer, but I have sung songs for years. I wonder if this is a difficult feat, or whether most pro singers can do this as effortlessly as John and Paul do.
Faded flowers, wait in a jar, till the evening is complete... complete... complete... complete...
1.36am
6 December 2012
If you’re referring to what I think you’re referring to, then I think I know how to do it. It’s sort of like a little stop after each syllable: “Ha (very quick pause)- a (very quick pause)- and.” The air is cut off for a fraction of a second, and then the singing resumes on a different note. (I’m pretty sure it’s called a glottal stop.)
And if this isn’t what you’re talking about, sorry.
Also known as Egg-Rock, Egg-Roll, E-George, Eggy, Ravioli, Eggroll Eggrolli...
~witty quote~
7.52am
1 November 2012
Egroeg Evoli said
If you’re referring to what I think you’re referring to, then I think I know how to do it. It’s sort of like a little stop after each syllable: “Ha (very quick pause)- a (very quick pause)- and.” The air is cut off for a fraction of a second, and then the singing resumes on a different note. (I’m pretty sure it’s called a glottal stop.)And if this isn’t what you’re talking about, sorry.
You could be right — but the three syllables run so fast together, I’m amazed it could be done that way (also, there’s no “h” aspiration on the 2nd and 3rd syllables, from what I can hear).
Faded flowers, wait in a jar, till the evening is complete... complete... complete... complete...
5.01pm
10 January 2013
You mean right at the end of the song?
If so, they did a similar thing on “Rain “:
e.g.
3:38-56
6:10-26
9:12-30
12:29-46
If I remember right, the equivalent thing on a guitar is known as a slur.
There’s also actually a lot of it in the bass part of Rain :
(e.g. 0:48-56)
For a vocalist it’s just a matter of dipping the sung note by a semitone or so for an instant, and then sliding quickly up to the correct pitch. If you sing the word “yeah” you may find that the slur effect happens almost automatically. Or you might get it if you can sing a note using strong vibrato, a la Marc Bolan……that should help you to feel how your throat muscles can sweep the pitch up and down. It’s probably not difficult to learn, but quite impressive when it’s done.
5.21pm
1 November 2012
No, it’s done throughout the song, whenever they sing “Hand” — at the second time of each set of three.
I wanna hold your hand [high note, sustained]
I wanna hold your hand [ha a-a /a /a-a-and]
I wanna hold your hand [back down to tonic note].
As can be seen in the above, I also just remembered it’s not ONLY a 3-note thing, there’s also a double-note, immediately followed by a single note, immediately followed by the 3-note thing. And NONE of them are helped by the aspirated “h” consonant, so it all has to be done by singing “ah” — NOT just “ha” (which would make it somewhat easier, but still more difficult than other consonants, like “la” or “da” or “ma” or “ta” etc.).
This set of three “hand” stanzas is repeated 4 times. It is NOT that last “Ha-a-a-a-a-a-annnd”, which is 7 syllables, and slow enough that it can be sung even by ME!
Faded flowers, wait in a jar, till the evening is complete... complete... complete... complete...
6.48pm
1 December 2009
That 7-note descending bit on ha-a-a–a-a-a-a-nd is one of the great bits of Beatle vocal virtuosity – they even manage to harmonize! Breathtaking.
GEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
5.35pm
6 December 2012
6.29pm
8 November 2012
I TubeChopped it. You mean this, right?
http://www.tubechop.com/watch/983468
Yeah, that’s a hard one. And like vonbontee said, even more impressive that they can do it together.
parlance
7.25pm
1 November 2012
Egroeg Evoli said
Funny Paper said
I wanna hold your hand [ha a-a /a /a-a-and]
I can sing that using the stop-thingy I described. That’s the line you were referring to, right?
I’d say “yes”, except that you refer to it in the singular, as though it only happens once in the song.
Just to make sure, I am NOT referring to the 7-syllable “ha a-a /a /a-a-and” at the very end of the song, which is slower and even I can sing it. Rather, I am referring to the much faster 7-syllable “ha a-a /a /a-a-and”s that occur 4 different times throughout the song.
Faded flowers, wait in a jar, till the evening is complete... complete... complete... complete...
7.27pm
1 November 2012
Metaphorically, John and Paul during those four very fast 7-syllable “ha a-a /a /a-a-and” parts are using their vocal cords almost as though they were whips, oscillating them side to side (and on a descant) with the greatest of ease.
Faded flowers, wait in a jar, till the evening is complete... complete... complete... complete...
Maybe I’m getting the wrong idea here, but I’ve never really considered this difficult? It’s an awesome little melodic twist for sure, and love how they do it in harmony, but I wouldn’t say it’s any more difficult to sing than any other line.
The following people thank Ben Ramon for this post:
OudisSHUT UP - Paulie's talkin'
2.12am
1 November 2012
Ben Ramon said
Maybe I’m getting the wrong idea here, but I’ve never really considered this difficult? It’s an awesome little melodic twist for sure, and love how they do it in harmony, but I wouldn’t say it’s any more difficult to sing than any other line.
I used to think that too — until I tried to sing along recently and simply couldn’t approximate what they are doing.
Faded flowers, wait in a jar, till the evening is complete... complete... complete... complete...
12.59am
6 December 2012
Funny Paper said
Egroeg Evoli said
Funny Paper said
I wanna hold your hand [ha a-a /a /a-a-and]
I can sing that using the stop-thingy I described. That’s the line you were referring to, right?
I’d say “yes”, except that you refer to it in the singular, as though it only happens once in the song.
Just to make sure, I am NOT referring to the 7-syllable “ha a-a /a /a-a-and” at the very end of the song, which is slower and even I can sing it. Rather, I am referring to the much faster 7-syllable “ha a-a /a /a-a-and”s that occur 4 different times throughout the song.
Yeah, I know that’s what you meant. Sorry if it was unclear.
Also known as Egg-Rock, Egg-Roll, E-George, Eggy, Ravioli, Eggroll Eggrolli...
~witty quote~
3.12am
1 November 2012
Egroeg,
Just wondered if you had any thoughts, seeing that you are a singer, on how a singer can comfortably sing a long string of words that are so close together and sung so fast they don’t seem to permit any breathing in between?
I recently wrote a song that has one part that is very “wordy”. Let me count the syllables that have to be sung (different notes) all in a fast string without any pauses for breath: yep, 28 syllables (which represent about 20 words, since most of the words have only one syllable anyway).
I can sing it if I quickly suck in my breath at odd moments, but it sounds funny to do that, and I can’t do it silently. The other alternative is to take a giant breath before the 28 syllables and see if I can make it through.
Surely, there has to be a better way — some trick singers know?
Faded flowers, wait in a jar, till the evening is complete... complete... complete... complete...
3.37am
6 December 2012
Funny Paper said
Egroeg,Just wondered if you had any thoughts, seeing that you are a singer, on how a singer can comfortably sing a long string of words that are so close together and sung so fast they don’t seem to permit any breathing in between?
I recently wrote a song that has one part that is very “wordy”. Let me count the syllables that have to be sung (different notes) all in a fast string without any pauses for breath: yep, 28 syllables (which represent about 20 words, since most of the words have only one syllable anyway).
I can sing it if I quickly suck in my breath at odd moments, but it sounds funny to do that, and I can’t do it silently. The other alternative is to take a giant breath before the 28 syllables and see if I can make it through.
Surely, there has to be a better way — some trick singers know?
Hmm… Well, it might be easier if you take a fairly large breath before singing that part of the song, and then try to “pace” your breathing. Don’t let too much air out when you sing that part. It might be a little quieter, but it will probably help.
Also, the “correct” breathing method for singing is to “inflate” your stomach (well, the diaphragm moves, and it makes your stomach move) when inhaling and “deflate” it when exhaling- in other words, breathe deeply as if you were asleep. Try just breathing naturally, without really thinking about it, and you’ll see what I mean.
I learned that singing for a long time is easier if you “push” against the force that makes the diaphragm contract when you exhale (or maybe it just flattens out; I’m not 100% sure). Or something like that. Sorry if that doesn’t make sense.
The following people thank Egroeg Evoli for this post:
OudisAlso known as Egg-Rock, Egg-Roll, E-George, Eggy, Ravioli, Eggroll Eggrolli...
~witty quote~
1 Guest(s)