11.41am
20 April 2016
Compare ears.Lasr interview on tour USA 1966
Sceptic said
Joe said
@Sceptic said
Ahhh Girl said
The Paul is Dead thread is here: https://www.beatlesbible.com/f…..l-is-dead/ Please discuss the topic there, not in this thread.Perhaps you would like this thread also, @Sceptic: https://www.beatlesbible.com/f…..ead-clues/
Thanks, will do when I’ve answered the responses.
Please don’t. This isn’t the place for stupid conspiracy theories. Just drop it. Any Paul Is Dead messages outside of the threads that @Ahhh Girl directed you towards are likely to be deleted.
I see my post was deleted. I am not a conpiracy theorist. I am a forensic examiner. Trying to show the obvious changes that occurred in the space of a few months.
I know a little about forensics, can you repost your info here so I and the others can take a look?
OK, but I could post 100 comparative photos, and they are all open to the usual lighting/angle/ageing explanations. For starters, here are a few showing how the changes occurred, some in the space of a few months.
12.13pm
27 March 2015
Contact lenses weren’t very common back then, and highly uncomfortable. Coloured contact lenses weren’t available until 1982.
Paul’s eyes often looked dark, and they often did not. Case in point (warning: picture overload):
Anyway, now that we’ve got that one out of the way, what other ‘discrepancies’ should we be able to see?
Formerly Known As JPM-Fangirl -- 2016
'Out There' - 07-06-2015 - Ziggo Dome Amsterdam -- 'One On One' - 12-06-2016 - Pinkpop Festival Landgraaf
12.17pm
27 April 2015
12.19pm
27 March 2015
Sceptic said
OK, but I could post 100 comparative photos, and they are all open to the usual lighting/angle/ageing explanations. For starters, here are a few showing how the changes occurred, some in the space of a few months.
Would you honestly say these are fair comparisons? The expressions are completely different, for starters. Try these (not made by me):
The following people thank Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^< for this post:
Necko, pepperland, C.R.A.Formerly Known As JPM-Fangirl -- 2016
'Out There' - 07-06-2015 - Ziggo Dome Amsterdam -- 'One On One' - 12-06-2016 - Pinkpop Festival Landgraaf
12.25pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
LoveUlikeGuitars said
^^^ Don’t make me stray from John xD
(Even for just a little while)
We will make a Paulvert out of you yet.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
O Boogie, Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
12.30pm
27 April 2015
Ahhh Girl said
LoveUlikeGuitars said
^^^ Don’t make me stray from John xD
(Even for just a little while)
We will make a Paulvert out of you yet.
Oh the blasphemy! *shocked*
It’s safe for me [and John (overstating my importance just a little bit)] that you , AG!
The following people thank O Boogie for this post:
Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<, Ahhh Girl
For tomorrow may rain, so I'll follow the Sun
12.36pm
27 March 2015
12.42pm
27 March 2015
12.44pm
20 April 2016
JPM-Fangirl said
Sceptic said
OK, but I could post 100 comparative photos, and they are all open to the usual lighting/angle/ageing explanations. For starters, here are a few showing how the changes occurred, some in the space of a few months.
Would you honestly say these are fair comparisons? The expressions are completely different, for starters. Try these (not made by me):
I was not looking for unfair comparisons, just comparisons that show differences. A lot of work has gone into photoshopping photos, making the noses the same, when in unaltered photos they are very different. Also plastic surgery throughout the years. I would say the ones you posted are unfair comparisons. They compare Faul with anothe pic of Faul, for instance. Others are altered photos. Some show clear differences in facial features. Who made up your comparison collage? What was their agenda? (Please notice the fake earlobe in next pic on right). My photos are unaltered and show clear differences in nose, jawline, cheekbones.
Here’s an example of what people accepted as Paul, dated 1967:
12.50pm
27 March 2015
Formerly Known As JPM-Fangirl -- 2016
'Out There' - 07-06-2015 - Ziggo Dome Amsterdam -- 'One On One' - 12-06-2016 - Pinkpop Festival Landgraaf
1.01pm
27 April 2015
JPM-Fangirl said
P.S. @Sceptic You’ve told us in the other thread that you’re a forensic investigator. What would you say if I told you I’m Paul’s niece?
Doesn’t that put a dampener on your Ahhh Paul fantasies a little bit?
The following people thank O Boogie for this post:
Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<, Starr Shine?
For tomorrow may rain, so I'll follow the Sun
1.02pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
JPM-Fangirl said
P.S. sceptic You’ve told us in the other thread that you’re a forensic investigator. What would you say if I told you I’m Paul’s niece?
**I** would say, “Chick, you better get to introducing me to him.”
Are you really?
Yeah, I know I need to stay on topic. I just can’t take this thread seriously. But, as a mod, I will try to refrain from this point on.
EDIT: Just saw your post, LULG. The answer is, “No, not at all.” I don’t think Paul would go for his own niece. Less competition, baby!
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
1.03pm
27 March 2015
Nah, if it works for rednecks, it works for me
@Ahhh Girl
Alas, I amn’t Didn’t say I was, either. I just asked what he/she would say if I said that I was.
But then, I don’t believe for a second Sceptic works in forensics, either.
The following people thank Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^< for this post:
Ahhh GirlFormerly Known As JPM-Fangirl -- 2016
'Out There' - 07-06-2015 - Ziggo Dome Amsterdam -- 'One On One' - 12-06-2016 - Pinkpop Festival Landgraaf
1.03pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Isn’t this another one of those where no matter what evidence is put forward for the ‘Paul Never Died’ side its claimed its either photoshopped pics, plastic surgery, conspiracies by those involved or some other reason which conveniently swipes it all away?
Its why I have no time for such discussions.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
1.09pm
27 April 2015
Ahhh Girl said
EDIT: Just saw your post, LULG. The answer is, “No, not at all.” I don’t think Paul would go for his own niece. Less competition, baby!
Nah, I meant J-girl’s fantasies. It puts a dampener on her fantasies if she were Paul’s niece
I thought Ahhh + ____ was a common terminology for the fangirl moments xD
For tomorrow may rain, so I'll follow the Sun
1.11pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Ahhh, I get it, LULG.
@Sceptic, I’m tired of playing whack-a-mole with your new threads. Stop.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
O Boogie, Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
1.14pm
11 November 2010
Here’s why Paul is alive.
Think of all the people who are associated with the Beatles. Think of all the musicians, record producers, other studio personnel, Apple Corps, family members, close personal friends, record label executives, music publishers, Maharishis, girlfriends, filmmakers, and Pete Bests associated with the Beatles. All put together, that’s a ton of people. That’s a ton of people that would probably know the truth if Paul died. None of them, over the past fifty years, has had a guilty conscience and fessed to the public that Paul is really dead. If there really was a conspiracy, one of them would have spilled the beans by now, but they haven’t because there is no conspiracy.
The following people thank Necko for this post:
Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<, pepperland, C.R.A.I'm Necko. I'm like Ringo except I wear necklaces.
I'm also ewe2 on weekends.
Most likely to post things that make you go hmm... 2015, 2016, 2017.
1.15pm
27 March 2015
1.18pm
20 April 2016
Necko said
Here’s why Paul is alive.Think of all the people who are associated with the Beatles. Think of all the musicians, record producers, other studio personnel, Apple Corps, family members, close personal friends, record label executives, music publishers, Maharishis, girlfriends, filmmakers, and Pete Bests associated with the Beatles. All put together, that’s a ton of people. That’s a ton of people that would probably know the truth if Paul died. None of them, over the past fifty years, has had a guilty conscience and fessed to the public that Paul is really dead. If there really was a conspiracy, one of them would have spilled the beans by now, but they haven’t because there is no conspiracy.
Or they are fearful. With good reason.
5 Guest(s)