8.46pm
10 April 2018
The following people thank wilusa for this post:
50yearslate, Beatlebug9.51am
15 November 2018
4.23pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
50yearslate said
GRANDPUPPIES?That’s blessed and amazing.
Yes, Martha was a fine lady. I believe one of them was on the cover of Paul Is Live.
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
4.50pm
15 November 2018
Indeed! I think their name was Arrow? I could be wrong…
I wonder if Arrow is one of the pups in the picture… (I have no idea when Paul Is Live came out so no idea if the time periods match up at all)
The following people thank 50yearslate for this post:
BeatlebugLove one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019: 2020:
6.51pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Paul Is Live was released in late 1993, and presumably the cover photo would have been taken that year. Judging by Paul’s hairdo, the puppy photo looks like it could have been taken a few years earlier, in the late ’80s. Age-wise, it seems possible that one of those puppies is Arrow.
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
50yearslate([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
10.10am
26 January 2017
The following people thank QuarryMan for this post:
Beatlebug, sigh butterfly, penny laneI've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
10.58am
1 December 2009
Beatlebug said
Paul Is Live was released in late 1993, and presumably the cover photo would have been taken that year. Judging by Paul’s hairdo, the puppy photo looks like it could have been taken a few years earlier, in the late ’80s. Age-wise, it seems possible that one of those puppies is Arrow.
It is Arrow, yes.
As for Martha, I don’t know how many recorded examples of her voice exist, but you can hear her bark a few times, and receive a shout-out from Paul in this remarkable (if poorly recorded) impromptu fan-interview from 1967, about one minute in:
The following people thank vonbontee for this post:
sigh butterfly, penny lane, RubeGEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
3.35pm
23 January 2022
Wow, what a fascinating recording! If that’s ’67 what TV show is he talking about? I love how generous he is with his time. Also, the stoned-sounding laugh
The following people thank meaigs for this post:
sigh butterflyMy hot take is that after the Beatles split they went down the paths of spiritualism, solipsism, alcoholism, and Paul McCartney
-- Jason Carty, Nothing is Real podcast
6.07pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Martha can be heard, and is referenced, on the 1966 BBC Radio programme The Lennon and McCartney Songbook, with Paul and John interviewed at Cavendish Avenue on 6 August (broadcast 29 August, while they were in America and performing their final ticketed concert at Candlestick Park). She can be heard at around 8:10, with Paul mentioning she’s 7 weeks old, along with some puns around her being an “Old” English Sheepdog.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Von Bontee, penny lane, Rube, WeepingAtlasCedars"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
1 Guest(s)