9.40am
25 January 2018
9.19pm
10 August 2011
Welcome, 8daysaweek!
OMG, have you heard Liam Gallagher’s recent “Wall of Glass”? Sounds very much like Lennon’s “Steel And Glass “
(Liam apparently named his son “Lennon”)
The following people thank Into the Sky with Diamonds for this post:
Father McKenzie, 8daysaweek"Into the Sky with Diamonds" (the Beatles and the Race to the Moon – a history)
2.33am
5 November 2011
Relevance is relative. He has had plenty of interviews along with so many songs about enough topics where somebody could make him relevant in any aspect of their life and the world around them if they so choose. But to the general human population, he is pretty irrelevant (as most things are).
The following people thank Little Piggy Dragonguy for this post:
8daysaweekAll living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
11.30am
6 July 2016
I often wonder if John (and Yoko) had a big influence on attitudes to gender roles i.e the idea that a man could be a house husband whilst the woman had the high powered job. I don’t think it was common back in 1980 but now we don’t blink an eye at this scenario or am I wrong?
The following people thank Leppo for this post:
8daysaweekPivotal Moments in Beatles History No.118: Yoko helps herself to one of George's digestives.
11.40am
15 May 2015
Leppo said
I often wonder if John (and Yoko) had a big influence on attitudes to gender roles i.e the idea that a man could be a house husband whilst the woman had the high powered job. I don’t think it was common back in 1980 but now we don’t blink an eye at this scenario or am I wrong?
I recall that back in the late 70s during a phase when John was “decompressing” he said he enjoyed just pottering around the (multi-million $$$) house, doing housework and listening to Muzak.
The following people thank Pineapple Records for this post:
8daysaweekA ginger sling with a pineapple heart,
a coffee dessert, yes you know it's good news...
3.46pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Here’s proof Lennon’s influence is still present TODAY. Jamie Skylar Delivers Ethereal Message from John Lennon in “I Know You Know the Walrus Too”
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
Beatlebug, 8daysaweekCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
6.35pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
To answer the original question: yes. Even if not directly. John, either alone or with the other Beatles, influenced an entire generation. That generation had/has an influence on their kids, grandkids, etc… The wide variety of ages of the members in this very Forum is proof of that. Many generations reside here.
The following people thank Zig for this post:
Beatlebug, 8daysaweekTo the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
6.48pm
5 November 2011
Ahhh Girl said
Here’s proof Lennon’s influence is still present TODAY. Jamie Skylar Delivers Ethereal Message from John Lennon in “I Know You Know the Walrus Too”
Jamie Skylar is definitely NOT relevant, though, so how strong is does this hold up as “proof” that John Lennon is relevant? It only proves that he is relevant to this irrelevant person.
The following people thank Little Piggy Dragonguy for this post:
8daysaweekAll living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
7.48pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Would we be discussing it if his influence wasn’t still present?
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Ahhh Girl, 8daysaweek([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
7.54pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Little Piggy Dragonguy said
Ahhh Girl said
Here’s proof Lennon’s influence is still present TODAY. Jamie Skylar Delivers Ethereal Message from John Lennon in “I Know You Know the Walrus Too”Jamie Skylar is definitely NOT relevant, though, so how strong is does this hold up as “proof” that John Lennon is relevant? It only proves that he is relevant to this irrelevant person.
I’m not sure I follow your logic, LPD. AG said his “influence” is still present. In two separate posts in this thread, you are arguing about his relevance. Perhaps the confusion (on my part as well as yours) is due to the fact that the thread title asks about John’s influence while the OP posed a question in the first post that asks about his relevance.
If this thread is asking about his influence, I offer an unequivocal yes. If you ask me about his relevance, my confidence wavers.
The following people thank Zig for this post:
Beatlebug, Necko, 8daysaweekTo the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
11.50pm
22 December 2013
Zig said
I’m not sure I follow your logic, LPD. AG said his “influence” is still present. In two separate posts in this thread, you are arguing about his relevance. Perhaps the confusion (on my part as well as yours) is due to the fact that the thread title asks about John’s influence while the OP posed a question in the first post that asks about his relevance.
If this thread is asking about his influence, I offer an unequivocal yes. If you ask me about his relevance, my confidence wavers.
His message of peace is more “relevant” than ever… and that crosses over to the music where ‘Give Peace A Chance ‘ is sung at candlelight vigils all over the globe to this day… his music is covered literally on a daily basis at concerts everywhere… His “relevance” has transcended far beyond the Rock ‘N’ Roll beginnings… Lennon Lives…:-)
The following people thank Billy Rhythm for this post:
Ahhh Girl, Zig, Beatlebug, 8daysaweek3.54pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
10.29pm
5 November 2011
Zig said
I’m not sure I follow your logic, LPD. AG said his “influence” is still present. In two separate posts in this thread, you are arguing about his relevance. Perhaps the confusion (on my part as well as yours) is due to the fact that the thread title asks about John’s influence while the OP posed a question in the first post that asks about his relevance.
If this thread is asking about his influence, I offer an unequivocal yes. If you ask me about his relevance, my confidence wavers.
I was talking of relevance because the first post in the thread asks about relevance.
I could argue that he is relevant today and could also argue that his influence is still present, but I could also argue the opposite. It’s a pretty broad question. My opinion would be based upon how specific of a level we are talking. In the grand scheme of the world, I would say no, but on a smaller scale, I would say that for many people, in their lives, the answer would be yes. Obviously his influence is still present for many people, but is it present to society? To the world? I don’t know that it is.
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
11.23pm
5 November 2011
10.11am
22 December 2013
Little Piggy Dragonguy said
Obviously his influence is still present for many people, but is it present to society? To the world? I don’t know that it is.
https://www.rollingstone.com/m…..ny-w516579
Can’t really imagine (pun intended) any better example of his influence/relevance “present to society” and “To the world” than this…:-)
The following people thank Billy Rhythm for this post:
Ahhh Girl, 8daysaweek5.43am
14 June 2016
The Beatles’ legacy is secured as a band, so that means Lennon’s legacy is also secured. He is preserved for all time as a restless voice. His work is always going to be something people can tap into and find inspiration in.
The following people thank Timothy for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog1.The Beatles 2.Sgt. Pepper 3.Abbey Road 4.Magical Mystery Tour 5.Rubber Soul 6.Revolver 7.Help! 8.Let It Be
9.A Hard Day’s Night 10.Please Please Me 11.Beatles For Sale 12.With The Beatles 13.Yellow Submarine
Most Avid John Fan 2020 and 2021:
1 Guest(s)