Log In
Register
4.02pm
18 December 2017
Offline
vonbontee said
Von Bontee said
I welcome that idea, ’cause frankly I think all those redundant “Hard Day’s night” heads are kind of an eyesore, and most of them could be eliminated. You can hardly telll one from the next, they’re so small and lo-def. And I think they’re overused in general: Employing a smiley to convey a certain tone or commentary is fine, but inserting them into a block of text in place of typing a simple “Paul” or “Ringo” – that really irritates me.
Sorry, don’t wanna be a blue meanie or offend anyone, just giving my opinion. And I know I have no right to complain, since this is Joe’s webpage (& a fine one), and I’ve certainly employed the smileys myself a coupla times. I found both the pointing-upward and nose-thumbing ones most useful. even though they’re so small I can barely tell whose faces they are. (Ringo and Paul?)
OK, rant over. As for suggestions…I have none of my own. I’ll leave it to everyone else to think up some really good ones. I’m not sure just what circumstances would call for “Two Virgins ” or Apple ones to be used…
Man, that “Von Bonehead” dude could be an insufferable dick in those days – glad he never posted again (except for a little)
ooooof. we use the apple so much now!
The following people thank TheWalrusWasBrian for this post:
Beatlebug, Getbackintheussr, Von Bontee, WeepingAtlasCedars
|
| I don’t know how to put it here. hello for the love of god hello
~~~
The Concert for Bageldesh
~~~
Walrian here! Not Fiddy, or anyone else, actually.
10.51am
1 December 2009
Offline
Kaniffee said
How long ago was this?
Edit: sub-fiddy
9 years ago, first page on this thread.
The following people thank vonbontee for this post:
TheWalrusWasBrianGEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
11.28am
18 December 2017
Offline vonbontee said
Kaniffee said
How long ago was this
Edit: sub-fiddy
9 years ago, first page on this thread.
bb history. 
The following people thank TheWalrusWasBrian for this post:
Beatlebug| | I don’t know how to put it here. hello for the love of god hello
~~~
The Concert for Bageldesh
~~~
Walrian here! Not Fiddy, or anyone else, actually.
9.01pm
11 April 2016
Offline @Joe said
but I won’t do the exis. Let’s keep it manageable.
…What exactly do you mean by “manageable”? I understand that you don’t want too many smileys, and that they would need to portray an emotion unique enough to what we already have in order to warrant including them, but if they meet that criteria is that not reasonable enough? Not only that, but are they not important enough to justify inclusion? Sure, we can have some random girl that portrays an emotion useful enough for a smiley 
, but if there’s a nice-quality and croppable photo of Jürgen, who helped lead to the adoption of the boy’s still-recognisable moptop haircuts, out there that portrays something just as useful there’ll be no consideration whatsoever?
By the way, I didn’t mean to thank that post.
The following people thank WeepingAtlasCedars for this post:
Beatlebug"WeepyC came into the fray as the premier Jimmy Page fan, and will remain." - sir walter raleigh
2016 & 2017: 
2020: 
6.39am
31 March 2008
Offline
I think there are a few considerations. The number of smileys, the emotions they portray, and the significance in the Beatles’ story. On the latter point, I don’t want to drill down too far, else we’d end up in Mona Best/Dot Jarlett territory. My guess is that, while many here have probably heard of Jürgen Vollmer before, they’d struggle to pick him out in a police line-up.
“Manageable” means that I don’t want to spend my time cutting out tiny images of minor players. It also means when the smiley drawer is opened, people aren’t overwhelmed by dozens and dozens of images. I’ve already cut back on a lot that weren’t really serving a useful purpose, and I’m broadly happy with the current lot.
The following people thank Joe for this post:
Beatlebug, Von Bontee, WeepingAtlasCedarsCan buy me love! Please consider supporting the Beatles Bible on Amazon
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs
Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!
11.22am
Moderators
15 February 2015
Offline 
To be fair, if it weren’t for the smiley, I’d struggle to pick Neil Aspinall out of a police line-up too. And I’d recognise Klaus Voormann anywhere, though perhaps that’s just me.
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site! 
6.47pm
30 April 2019
Offline I don’t have a specific one in mind, but I feel like we don’t have a smiley that just means sad.
We have this
which is sad-annoyed maybe, and thiswhich is sad-confused, this
could be sad, but it also reads kind if confused, and this one 
just seems empty.
If anyone has an idea for a sad smiley, or one they use for sad that I didn’t bring up that would be cool. I might try finding one myself later.
6.54pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline I’ve always used for sad. Never thought of it as sad-confused. Now it’s suggested, still see it as just sad and not sad-confused.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
The Hole Got Fixed, Beatlebug, 50yearslate, Richard"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
6.57pm
30 April 2019
Offline I always thought the finger scratching was like he’s thinking, but maybe that’s just me.
6.59pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline That’s not finger scratching, it’s wiping away a tear.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
The Hole Got Fixed"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
8.11pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Offline I use it as sad and awkward at the same time. For sad, I use or 
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
9.00pm
15 November 2018
Offline I’d still like to see a smiley Paul & John…
Love one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018:
2019: 
2020:
10.28pm
Members
18 March 2013
Offline I use as like an awkward smiley. One that you would preface with a sigh and a “well….”
Like if I said Abbey Road came out in 1968 and someone corrected me:
“…yeah you’re right”.
Never thought of it as a sad smiley before.
I demand a Bob Wooler smiley!
The following people thank AppleScruffJunior for this post:
Beatlebug
INTROVERTS UNITE! Separately....in your own homes!
***
Make Love, Not Wardrobes!
***
"Stop throwing jelly beans at me"- George Harrison
8.30am
30 April 2019
Offline There have been enough differing opinions on thissmiley that I think my point still stands on there not being a smiley that is unambiguously and only sad.
3.42pm
15 November 2018
Offline 
I use as unambiguously and only sad, excepting the few times I use it to show happy tears.
Love one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019: 2020:
11.02pm
30 April 2019
Offline Yes, but the point is that’s not a universal experience
11.52pm
5 November 2011
Offline 
I’ve always thought he looked confused here. Doesn’t look very sad to me. I always use 
to portray sadness.
The following people thank Little Piggy Dragonguy for this post:
Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedarsAll living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
10.10pm
11 April 2016
Offline Joe said
I think there are a few considerations. The number of smileys, the emotions they portray, and the significance in the Beatles’ story. On the latter point, I don’t want to drill down too far, else we’d end up in Mona Best/Dot Jarlett territory. My guess is that, while many here have probably heard of Jürgen Vollmer before, they’d struggle to pick him out in a police line-up.“Manageable” means that I don’t want to spend my time cutting out tiny images of minor players. It also means when the smiley drawer is opened, people aren’t overwhelmed by dozens and dozens of images. I’ve already cut back on a lot that weren’t really serving a useful purpose, and I’m broadly happy with the current lot.
Alrighty, then. I know I’d recognise him, but then again I’m a bit of an Exi-maniac, so…
But just because we can’t have them doesn’t mean I want them any less. I just love ’em too much
The following people thank WeepingAtlasCedars for this post:
Beatlebug"WeepyC came into the fray as the premier Jimmy Page fan, and will remain." - sir walter raleigh
2016 & 2017:
2020:
7.48am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline There is a thread for Smiley suggestions, @Jules. 
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
The Hole Got Fixed, Jules"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
7.55am
Moderators
27 November 2016
Offline Clerefor Sede said
The Hole Got Fixed said
I think some punctuation causes a problem with the auto-links for the songs.
I thought so too but then why Sgt. Pepper works just fine?
The follies of technology? I genuinely have no idea sorry.
As for smileys: Joe is open to new smileys provided the convey an emotion we don’t currently have. He doesn’t want 200 smileys all very similar and will only add smileys if they serve a distinct purpose – but if you have some ideas, please do post them here – I’d love to see them! https://www.beatlesbible.com/f…..ggestions/
Great! didn’t see that. That’s my point, smileys shouldn’t just be put by the hour and ending up being like thousands, but the ones that are there already are just too few, and there are many other emotions that could be original and funny that aren’t featured right now. I’ll see if I come up with some.
If you find any gaps, please do make some suggestions!
There could also be a display of smiley categories, either by emotions, members of the band, just like the emojis on WhatsApp, that are separated by topics. There are currently 54 smileys, I think at least 200 in blocks of 50 would seem about right.
Currently they’re sorted by row:
John
Paul
George
Ringo
5th Beatles
Misc.
Re. the bolded text in your quote, Joe has more or less intimated that probably will never happen – see post 265 in this thread for his words on the matter, for example, or even post 1.
The following people thank The Hole Got Fixed for this post:
Jules, Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars#AppleHoley2024: Make America Great For The First Time
2016 awards: 
2017 awards: 
2018 awards:
2019 awards: 
2020 awards:
2021 awards:
5 Guest(s)