11.08pm
4 March 2011
mr. Sun king coming together said:
Okay, new thread: The Random Grammar Thread To Appease MMM and The array Of The Grammar Nazis!!! That's where all these stupid boring useless grammar questions/interpretations/soul eaters go!!
so den whe typ lyk this den fowr it?
*20*
ONE MINUTE YOU'RE DEFENDING THE WHOLE GALAXY, AND SUDDENLY, YOU FIND YOURSELF SUCKING DOWN DARJEELING WITH MARIE ANTOINETTE AND HER LITTLE SISTER.!
5.45pm
14 December 2009
12.20am
4 December 2010
YKYAHBB when you look at the “recent new members”, and love this fantastic username:
Then, you type “hardcore” in the Search Bar to find this thread and don't click on any of the adverts.
I told her I didn’t
12.22am
19 September 2010
The Walrus said:
YKYAHBB when you look at the “recent new members”, and love this fantastic username:
Does that mean I'm not hardcore because I know it was Daniel again and I am debating putting a motion before Joe to ban him?
As if it matters how a man falls down.'
'When the fall's all that's left, it matters a great deal.
12.29am
4 December 2010
mr. Sun king coming together said:
The Walrus said:
YKYAHBB when you look at the “recent new members”, and love this fantastic username:
Does that mean I'm not hardcore because I know it was Daniel again and I am debating putting a motion before Joe to ban him?
No, knowing it is Daniel is good enough, though it was fairly obvious.
I think this new account should be banned, even though I still think it is pretty funny, because the username is ridiculously long and would break the forum. Daniel should stay IMO, whether Joe/whoever agrees is another matter. You just need to realise that he isn't as stupid as he pretends to be and he doesn't do any harm.
I told her I didn’t
12.33am
19 September 2010
The Walrus said:
mr. Sun king coming together said:
The Walrus said:
YKYAHBB when you look at the “recent new members”, and love this fantastic username:
Does that mean I'm not hardcore because I know it was Daniel again and I am debating putting a motion before Joe to ban him?
No, knowing it is Daniel is good enough, though it was fairly obvious.
I think this new account should be banned, even though I still think it is pretty funny, because the username is ridiculously long and would break the forum. Daniel should stay IMO, whether Joe/whoever agrees is another matter. You just need to realise that he isn't as stupid as he pretends to be and he doesn't do any harm.
A) It wasn't a Holmesian thing.
B) he says his other accounts aren't working, so make of that what you will.
C) You haven't seen his PM's to me, obviously.
As if it matters how a man falls down.'
'When the fall's all that's left, it matters a great deal.
12.45am
4 December 2010
12.46am
4 December 2010
12.46am
8 June 2011
mr. Sun king coming together said:
The Walrus said:
mr. Sun king coming together said:
The Walrus said:
YKYAHBB when you look at the “recent new members”, and love this fantastic username:
Does that mean I’m not hardcore because I know it was Daniel again and I am debating putting a motion before Joe to ban him?
No, knowing it is Daniel is good enough, though it was fairly obvious.
I think this new account should be banned, even though I still think it is pretty funny, because the username is ridiculously long and would break the forum. Daniel should stay IMO, whether Joe/whoever agrees is another matter. You just need to realise that he isn’t as stupid as he pretends to be and he doesn’t do any harm.
A) It wasn’t a Holmesian thing.
B) he says his other accounts aren’t working, so make of that what you will.
C) You haven’t seen his PM’s to me, obviously.
It wouln't let me use that name because it's too long I guess.):
Sun King , I apologized about that, though and you even said that you accepted it if I wasn't stupid anymore, and I stopped being stupid see and me no textspeak Daniel no more. Also, what does Holmesian supposed to mean, is it supposed to be like Sherlock Holmes?
12.48am
4 December 2010
1.11am
19 September 2010
1.14am
8 June 2011
I didn't get banned, Sun King ! I'm probably just mistaken in my mind, that's all, right?
*9-John agrees!*
3.14am
9 June 2010
Von Bontee said:
YKYAHBB when…you lay awake at night, obsessing over whether it's possible to derail the “Impossible To Derail” thread.
Well, if by some incredible accident of chance, it gets “railed,” then it might just be possible to derail it… Wait … but if it's not only impossible to derail it, but incredibly impossible to derail it, then would it really? But if things start to stick to one specific topic, and someone said something insane, then…
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
OK, I'm better now. 😀
And @Daniel: (yes, I'm biting) Yes, you got blocked. You're not “mistaken in your mind.” Why the heck did you make such an incredibly long username, anyway? You do realize that you would have to type that in every single time you log in, right?
*9– John must also think this is preposterous. Or maybe he's confused over whether it's possible to derail the underailable thread. Well, this is probably one of the last times you'll see a message containing 9, 17, 20, 19, 16, 12, 23, 8, 4, or 3 at the bottom of my posts. I won't stop announcing it entirely, but I'd like to cut down before the numbers become (are they already?) meaningless*
If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.
3.17am
19 September 2010
5.13am
1 May 2010
DANNY!(; said:
I didn’t get banned, Sun King ! I’m probably just mistaken in my mind, that’s all, right?
*9-John agrees!*
You got banned. Now at least you’re having decent conversations with everybody.
BTW that name is truly ridiculous, but if you did it to stop Joe to ban you, trust me, it won’t stop him.
Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie……
Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower…
Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go.
Beware of Darkness…
5.58am
8 June 2011
It was probably just an accident though, right? Because maybe he thought that I was the other Daniel that Paulrus thought I was, right?
And to MMM, I don’t have to type all that out. I just have to type in Danny and then my password which is a secret so I can’t tell you it!
8.33am
8 April 2010
DANNY!(; said:
It was probably just an accident though, right? Because maybe he thought that I was the other Daniel that Paulrus thought I was, right?
Hmm, somehow I don't think he did.
DANNY!(; said:
I didn’t get banned, Sun King ! I’m probably just mistaken in my mind, that’s all, right?
You did get banned, three times now. Every time you register a new account, I will disable it. I won’t attempt to justify the decision here – I’ve explained to you privately why you’re a PITA but you’ve ignored me and carried on regardless.
This thread is for the hardcore Beatles Biblers. You’re a troll.
Everyone else – please don't feed the trolls. I'll delete their messages, but it gets tricky when they're part of a conversation – I end up having to delete messages from legitimate users so the thread makes sense.
Can buy me love! Please consider supporting the Beatles Bible on Amazon
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs
Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!
1 Guest(s)