6.13pm
24 August 2012
I don’t know where all of you are from, but Americans are OBSESSED with the royals. Obsessed. So for something like this to happen, the American media will go absolutely insane and won’t shut up about it for probably another few weeks. That’s how American media is, I feel: report every single little thing that happens and act like it’s huge news.
Obviously, it was very rude of that photographer to take those pictures, but Americans hold on to every scandal like a dog holds on to steak. They just won’t give it up until they’ve picked apart all that they could.
You make your own dream.
7.09pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
So will the next pics of Victoria Beckham or some other celeb be passed over by The Sun, Daily Star or any other of the tabloids? Of course not, they wont be able to get the money out and print them quick enough. It wont even occur to them to ask how the photos were gained.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
7.48pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
annab93 said
I don’t know where all of you are from, but Americans are OBSESSED with the royals. Obsessed. So for something like this to happen, the American media will go absolutely insane and won’t shut up about it for probably another few weeks. That’s how American media is, I feel: report every single little thing that happens and act like it’s huge news.Obviously, it was very rude of that photographer to take those pictures, but Americans hold on to every scandal like a dog holds on to steak. They just won’t give it up until they’ve picked apart all that they could.
I think you may be referring to the American Media being obsessed with the Royals.
Personally, this American could not possibly care less if the queen herself was photograped topless.
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
8.27pm
24 August 2012
9.09pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Yeah – I don’t know why that is. I realize it is a small sample, but I can’t recall anyone I’ve ever known giving a rat’s sphincter about what the Royal lunatics were up to. The media here keeps ramming it down our throats as if we care. What a waste of time.
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
9.22pm
24 August 2012
9.31pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
OK, moving forward.
Big Bang Theory – why have I not been watching this show from the very beginning? It seems that every network except possibly the Food Network is airing the syndicated reruns. There is no time of day when no one is airing an episode of this show. So, me and the Missus decided to check it out one night. Now, we are recording every episode we can find.
Love. This. Show.
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
10.57pm
14 December 2009
Ha, I only discovered it myself last year! I fell in love instantly as well and watched every episode I could – it was on about 3 times a day on different networks…but I believe the scripts really went downhill about 2010 or so. New episodes pretty much suck. Just my opinion.
It’s pretty cool how each of the main 4 corresponds to a Beatle! (Howard = Ringo, Raj = George, Sheldon = Paul, Leonard = John)
Paul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
1.20am
9 May 2012
1.22am
24 August 2012
1.34am
23 July 2012
Oh my God , my favorite non-Beatles topic: THE BIG BANG THEORY!!!!!
If you’re not watching it already, you NEED to start.
feature=youtube_gdata_player
Love Amy’s tiara.
“I was special. I always have been. Why didn't anyone notice me?"
-John Lennon
3.23am
24 August 2012
3.23pm
14 December 2009
Why you think Sheldon is Paul and Leonard John?
Sheldon’s a control freak and egotist who has to have everything his way and dictates terms to the others, just like Paul! Meanwhile, Leonard wears glasses, plus his name kinda sounds like “Lennon”.
I suppose there are plausible reasons for reversing the two, however – John had a pretty healthy ego and some Sheldon-sized neuroses of his own.
Paul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
10.54pm
4 December 2010
2.10am
24 August 2012
Well, I’m listening to Revolution 9 at 9:09 pm, so I clearly feel like a champ. (even though it’s now 9:10)
You make your own dream.
11.01am
9 May 2012
Von Bontee said
Why you think Sheldon is Paul and Leonard John?Sheldon’s a control freak and egotist who has to have everything his way and dictates terms to the others, just like Paul! Meanwhile, Leonard wears glasses, plus his name kinda sounds like “Lennon”.
I suppose there are plausible reasons for reversing the two, however – John had a pretty healthy ego and some Sheldon-sized neuroses of his own.
Haha love the glasses part , but not really sure if they are comparable.
Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see.
1.47pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
5.06pm
14 December 2009
Raj is George because he is Indian and Howard is Ringo because all the others were taken?
Howard is Ringo because he LOOKS like Ringo! At least, the 1965 cartoon version of same. His is the first mental comparison I made. And yeah, Raj = George because of the Indian thing. Also, his periodic inability to speak makes him “the quiet one”.
Paul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
5.24pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Von Bontee said
And yeah, Raj = George because of the Indian thing. Also, his periodic inability to speak makes him “the quiet one”.
Unless he is drunk!
So, if Leonard is John, does that mean Penny is Cyn?
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
5 Guest(s)