8.33pm
17 October 2013
8.59pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Yeah, Trump’s 73, @Wigwam, and will be about the same age in 2024 as Joe Biden will be for the 2020 run should Biden get the Democratic nomination – a race he’s currently leading.
"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
11.40pm
17 October 2013
You really believe Biden will win the nomination?
For contextual information…….The median average age for Presidents at their time of inauguration is 55 years and 3 months…….Reagan was the oldest president to leave office……He was 77 and 349 days after his 2nd term.
Trump at 70 years and 220 days is already the oldest ever to assume office……..
All I have with regards to proof is that Trump says he was joking….and winding the media up.
Let’s hear your proof that he wasn’t joking……..
5.08pm
26 January 2017
Unless the DNC pulls some serious skullduggery, which I wouldn’t put past them, I don’t think Biden will get the nomination. He has the advantages of name recognition and popularity by association due to his status as former VP under Obama, and these things set him way ahead when he joined the race, but the more he opens his mouth the more he drops in the polls. Turns out, he’s actually kind of awful. Who knew?
I’ve also noticed that most old media liberal leaning US publications I’ve seen reporting on the Democratic race have ditched waxing eloquence about Biden and have switched to Warren… rats jump a sinking ship first. Warren seems to be a good person and a progressive, but I think she’s seen as the safe alternative to Sanders, who the establishment fears in the same way the Republican establishment feared Trump three years ago.
I've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
5.47pm
15 November 2018
6.52pm
26 January 2017
5.19am
17 October 2013
For me this should go in the happiness thread, as I see the humour………But I thought I’d get complaints so…….
Here’s a moral for the age…… This age!
The Ant & theGRASSHOPPERThis one is a little different …Two Different Versions …
Two Different MoralsOLD VERSIONThe ant works
hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.The grasshopper
thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.Come winter, the ant is warm
and well fed.The grasshopper has
no food or shelter, so he
dies out in the cold.MORAL OF THE OLD STORY:Be responsible for yourself!MODERN
VERSIONThe ant works hard
in the withering heat and the rain all summer long, building his house
and laying up supplies for the winter.The grasshopper thinks the ant
is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.Come winter, the shivering grasshopper
calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be
allowed to be warm and well fed while he is cold and starving..CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN,
and ABC show up to
provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper
next to a video of the ant
in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.
America is stunned by the sharp contrast.How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper
is allowed to suffer so?Kermit the Frog appears
on Oprah
with the grasshopper
and everybody cries when they sing, ‘It’s Not Easy Being Green’Occupy the Anthill stages
a demonstration in front of the ant’s house where the news stations film theBlack Lives Matter group singing, We shall overcome.Then Reverend Al Sharpton
has the group kneel down to pray for the grasshopper
while he damns the ants. He later appears on MSNBC to complain that rich people do not care.Former President Obama condemns the ant
and blames
Donald Trump, President Bush 43, President Bush 41, President Reagan, Christopher Columbus, and the
Pope
for the grasshopper’s
plight.Nancy Pelosi & Chuck Schumer
exclaim in an interview on The View
that the ant has
gotten rich off the back of the
grasshopper,
and both call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share.Finally, the EEOC drafts
the Economic Equity &
Anti-Grasshopper Act
retroactive to the beginning of
the summer.The ant is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number
of green bugs and,
having; nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by theGovernment Green Czar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and given to the grasshopper.The story ends as we see the grasshopper
and his free-loading friends finishing up the last bits of the ant’s food while the government house he is in,which, as you recall, just happens to be the ant’s old house,
crumbles around them because the grasshopper doesn’t maintain it.The ant has disappeared in the snow, never to be seen again.The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident, and the house, now abandoned, is taken
over by a gang of SPIDERS who terrorize the ramshackle, once prosperous and peaceful, neighborhood.The entire Nation collapses bringing the rest
of the free world with it.MORAL OF THE STORY:Be careful how you vote in 2020.
7.17am
9 March 2017
Great story but it’s ironic that you try to make the grasshopper a Democrat and the ant a Republican because the grasshopper kind of reminds me of Donald Trump and the ant reminds me of Bernie Sanders.
Think about it, Trump was born and raised into the top 1% and never had to worry about putting food on the table. Meanwhile, him and his followers try to make it seem like wealth is a choice and use it as an excuse to deny universal health care and give the rich a tax cut although the reality is that being rich is as much of a choice as being gay, if not less so because you don’t need to be lucky to fake being straight or remain celibate.
On the contrary, Bernie wasn’t so lucky and had to work his way to the top and when he finally did, he decided he wanted to help others just like him by taxing the rich more than the poor.
Personally, i don’t think anyone making $100K or less a year should be taxed at all, with each penny after that being a dime you’re taxed until you’re at $5M or higher where you’d be taxed 50% of your wealth. This would ensure only the rich would get taxed and they would be taxed well to ensure we get enough tax dollars.
The following people thank Dark Overlord for this post:
QuarryManIf you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
9.09am
17 October 2013
I think your interpretation is a stretch……But why not? That’s the beauty of the human parallax D.O.
We see what we want to see from the different degrees of angle of our views ……..We rationalise a way that the, irrational and the rational can merge to fit best with our established world views…..See order in chaos or chaos in order……….
Or…… as in this example see the weaknesses in capitalism where others would see it’s virtues……or the virtues in socialism where others see only its pitfalls.
We are free, (I think, our conditioning aside), to decide for ourselves the lessons that fables, allegories and parables are designed to illustrate…..
The fable I pasted is only a bit of fun……
Anyway…… why do you call yourself Dark Overlord…I’m not aware of it being a Beatle reference??
9.53am
15 November 2018
That’s quite a funny fable (I died around the ‘it’s not easy being green’ part) but DO has a point: what if the ant didn’t build his own house with his bare hands while the grasshopper danced and sang? What if the ant inherited his house and all his money and never works a day in his life, while the grasshopper is befallen by a string of bad luck, and every house he builds is blown away in the wind or washed away in the rain?
You’re only telling the story of one- there are many different stories that need to be considered.
The following people thank 50yearslate for this post:
Dark Overlord, Dark OverlordLove one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019: 2020:
12.03pm
Members
18 March 2013
3.29pm
9 March 2017
I think the core problem with this is that there’s 2 different types of wealth, earned wealth and birth wealth.
A great example of the former would be Oprah Winfrey. She was born to a teenage mother during a one night stand and grew up so poor she had to wear potato sacks as dresses but was able to use her talent at speaking to get to the top. While i don’t care for her style, i do have a lot of respect for people like her.
A great example of the latter would be Donald Trump. I have very little respect for people like him unless they give me a reason to respect them.
As for the name, it was originally gettingbetter but i changed it when i realized things were only getting worse. I don’t like the name and thought about reverting it to the original but it’s the name everyone knows me by.
The following people thank Dark Overlord for this post:
QuarryMan, The Hole Got FixedIf you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
4.58pm
26 January 2017
As DO says, the problem with the ‘pull yourself up by your bootstraps’ culture is that it doesn’t take into account birth privilege.
The following people thank QuarryMan for this post:
The Hole Got FixedI've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
5.30pm
Moderators
27 November 2016
This website has a nice infographic that tells a different story:
Some quotes from the article:
Among the poor aged 18 to 64, 40.8 percent worked for some part of the year and many of those not working reported barriers to paid work
Calls to increase work requirements among those receiving government assistance should recognize that most poor adults are already working, looking for work, or are disabled or ill.
You must understand – the vast majority of those who need help from the government etc. are actively trying to work, but they can’t get a job. No one wants to be in that situation, so >90% of people getting hand outs from the government are only thinking about trying to get a job.
The following people thank The Hole Got Fixed for this post:
QuarryMan#AppleHoley2024: Make America Great For The First Time
2016 awards: 2017 awards: 2018 awards: 2019 awards: 2020 awards: 2021 awards:
8.21pm
17 October 2013
You must understand – the vast majority of those who need help from the government etc. are actively trying to work, but they can’t get a job. No one wants to be in that situation, so >90% of people getting hand outs from the government are only thinking about trying to get a job.
Except when someone is exempt by law, you must search for work each week that you file a claim for benefits. If you do not search for work during a week in which you file a claim, benefits may be denied until you show that you have started looking for work.
8.46pm
Moderators
27 November 2016
9.03pm
17 October 2013
The Hole Got Fixed said
So we agree? Cool!That’s pretty much exactly what I said? People on benefits are looking for work – so why should we deny them benefits?
Some fancy footwork there…….5555.
Maybe explain my consternation over what you state and these figures……….?
If there are a million more jobs…….(a million more jobs) available than there are workers looking for jobs
……..Why can’t they find one?
9.16pm
Moderators
27 November 2016
Could be for a myriad of reasons.
Lack of qualifications
Unable to travel the distance to said job
Type of work isn’t suited to the individual
It’s kinda like making suicide illegal, and when people keep committing suicide, wondering why people haven’t stopped committing suicide.
Sometimes there are other things that need to happen first, before you can throw jobs at people.
Also, I’m assuming that my google search for ‘what does 5555 mean’ has returned the correct result: hahahaha, as 5 sounds like ha in Thai?
#AppleHoley2024: Make America Great For The First Time
2016 awards: 2017 awards: 2018 awards: 2019 awards: 2020 awards: 2021 awards:
9.57pm
17 October 2013
The Hole Got Fixed said
Could be for a myriad of reasons.Lack of qualifications
Unable to travel the distance to said job
Type of work isn’t suited to the individual
It’s kinda like making suicide illegal, and when people keep committing suicide, wondering why people haven’t stopped committing suicide.
Sometimes there are other things that need to happen first, before you can throw jobs at people.
Also, I’m assuming that my google search for ‘what does 5555 mean’ has returned the correct result: hahahaha, as 5 sounds like ha in Thai?
You’re right about 5555…
You watch….. you’ll all be doing it……555!
As for your myriad of reasons? I can go with all of those as being possible……Though I feel it’s realistic to add that if someone really wants to get a job..That with a million more jobs on offer….. together, don’t forget, with the number of jobs on offer that equal the number of unemployed……I reckon someone who was seriously searching for a job could find one….
It’s a possibility isn’t it?……Surprised you omitted that one…Just a slip?
Never mind……’Get woke, go broke’ you’ll see..5555!
Cheers
2.25pm
9 March 2017
Wigwam said
I reckon someone who was seriously searching for a job could find one….
For your average person, this may be true (after about a year of job searching) but let’s say you have a felony assault charge. If that’s the case, you’re going to have a very hard time getting a job because of that box you have to tick off on your application.
The following people thank Dark Overlord for this post:
50yearslateIf you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
1 Guest(s)