7.46am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
@Dark Overlord, you may want to look into rewording your post as the term/language you use in the first line can be taken as offensive to some in this day and age.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
The Hole Got Fixed, Dark Overlord"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
12.15pm
26 January 2017
^^ agreed. it’s not a nice term at all.
I think a case by case basis is probably a sensible approach in such cases, but generally everyone needs to know about these things and, on the original topic, this shouldn’t be up to parents. I’ve known too many parents who are so possessive of their children that they want them to stay innocent forever and shelter them accordingly. All it does is hurt them when they get older and encounter this stuff in the real world, at which point they will probably resent their parent for not telling them this.
The following people thank QuarryMan for this post:
The Hole Got FixedI've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
1.41pm
9 March 2017
@meanmistermustard I understand and respect what you’re doing but i felt that it was necessary in this case since i first used the preferred term intellectually disabled but ASJ got confused as to what i meant since the 2 words don’t exactly mean the same thing so i used the non-PC word since that’s the only way she would’ve known what i meant. I can assure you, i was not trying to offend anyone.
The following people thank Dark Overlord for this post:
QuarryManIf you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
4.06pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Dark Overlord, Dark Overlord, Dark Overlord, Dark Overlord([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
4.56pm
9 March 2017
That’s exactly my problem with statistics like these, they don’t explain why.
In this case, Yoko makes it seem like all those 1.4 million deaths was some a*****e taking an innocent life when in reality, not all of the people that account for the 1.4 million deaths were innocent. Even if the person who you killed tried to kill you and your whole family, it still counts. Sure, you should’ve tried to make the shot non-fatal but these decisions have to be made quick, you don’t have time to think about this sort of stuff or you and your whole family are dead.
The following people thank Dark Overlord for this post:
BeatlebugIf you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
5.09pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Whew.
I have things to say . . . loooooadss of things to say…
[Begin rant]
@Dark Overlord and @50yearslate, you definitely weren’t alone in not caring a jot about sex as kids. I was a complete innocent until I was about thirteen (I knew what different body parts were, and about periods and whatnot, but from my perspective it was more about bodily functions, like elimination, and I had no idea sex was a thing. (I knew that animals copulated, but human sex is far more complicated, baggage-ridden, and cultural than simply producing offspring — hence Why Don’t We Do It In The Road*) Obviously I had zero interest in doing it either. I don’t remember how I began to figure it out — I definitely wasn’t given a talk or anything, I think I just picked it up somehow, as kids of a certain age do — though I was a bit behind on it all; I think I was a bit of a late-bloomer as well, something few, save my parents, realised, as I always spoke and appeared older than my age. When I picked up on the notion, I was quite repulsed by it and wanted absolutely nothing to do with it — a sentiment I still harbour to some extent; though I’m perfectly fine discussing sex and joking about it, I don’t want it in the slightest, and find the thought of getting it on with someone mildly disgusting.
It’s partly my own personal, rather uncomfortable relationship with sex (maybe I would have been better off if it had been introduced to me in a more structured manner — who knows?) and partly the fact that I’m homeschooled, but mostly my belief in freedom of religious worship and parental sovereignty that leads me to my answer to the original question:
Ron Nasty inquired
Should parents be able to take their children out of classes that they disagree with on faith grounds, or should children be exposed to the broad view of society and opinions that may differ from their parents, allowing them to make up their minds?
Here’s the thing. I feel like it sounds nice to say ‘Kids should have a right to choose!’ but that’s not what you’re asking, is it? You’re asking if children should be required to be exposed to these views and whatever, or should parents have the right to make decisions about their children’s education. To which I must unequivocally answer the latter.
First of all, children are children. They’re immature, naive, stupid, and aren’t really capable of making wise decisions. (I should know, I was one quite recently.) That’s why we have parents**, who protect and guide their children until the kids have reached an age to think for themselves. A wise parent protects no more or less than necessary, guides with discretion, and encourages kids to think for themselves from an early age. An unwise parent might not. Most parents probably err in some sense or another. But parents should have the right to make these decisions about their child’s education and upbringing, rather than it be relegated to some great, clumsy bureaucracy in the sky which must make generalisations, cannot account for individuals, and may even have some agenda to push. (Brainwash ’em early, while you’re weeping, while still a baby in your pram! )
It’s this parental freedom of choice which has allowed me to receive the type of education/childhood I have, so of course I have a personal stake in it. But it’s not just that: based on my past personal experience as a nine-to-fourteen-year-old, and as someone who has a ten-year-old sibling, to read suggestions of non-optional sex education which delves into adult relationships at eleven/twelve, pornography at fourteen, is utterly appalling to me. Perhaps you, @AppleScruffJunior, would have benefitted from that. Perhaps most children would, although I doubt it. But I can tell you that I, for one, would have been SCARRED. FOR. LIFE! (I don’t know exactly where my sister’s head is at right now, but I’m pretty sure she’s quite far from any such notions, and I doubt that will change too quickly in the next couple of years.) My parents, had they been sending me to the ASJ School System, would have known that I wasn’t ready for that, and would have tried to withdraw me — as should be well within their rights.
Generally, I just don’t feel like this kind of thing is the domain of governments to be teaching our children about Facts Of Life. That’s supposed to be the parents’ job. Parents can, and should, educate their children on body parts, bodily functions, and different types of relationships when they become relevant. Obviously, I don’t have a problem with kids knowing about gay people — I don’t remember when I figured out that ‘gay’ doesn’t just mean ‘happy’, but I guess it was pretty early and I was like, ‘Oh, cool, whatever’ — as long as it’s not about sex. They just ain’t ready for that. And as for transgenderism, I don’t think that really needs to be a huge thing either. It’ll just confuse the wee’uns and you’d better believe it’s already confusing enough — gender dysphoria is really difficult to understand unless you experience it, and there’s a noted increase in young people thinking that they have gender dysphoria when it’s really just body dysmorphia or some other problem. Now, if it’s relevant to them, e.g. a family member is transitioning, then you can explain the bare bones of what’s going on, but once again, this is the domain of the family. If it eventually turns out that they’re trans themselves (which is, of course, statistically unlikely), then they’ll figure it out. With confusion, yes, and trouble, because (news flash) GENDER DYSPHORIA IS CONFUSING/TROUBLING AS FECK.
Now, if parents aren’t doing their jobs, that’s a whole other discussion…
…but this post is long enough and I need to stop. Anyway, there’s my two(??? more like twenty-five) cents. /rant
*which, by the way, I didn’t understand in the slightest as a child, nor particularly care about. I just pictured Paul and Ringo taking a board game up to the street in front of my house, and dodging cars, or something, and used to shake my head at their stupidity because the street in front of my house is busy as heck and One Does Not Simply Do Anything, really, In The Road.
**who are often also immature, naive, stupid, and mildly incapable of making wise decisions, but ya know
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
5.48pm
15 November 2018
Beatlebug said
Dark Overlord and @50yearslate, you definitely weren’t alone in not caring a jot about sex as kids. I was a complete innocent until I was about thirteen (I knew what different body parts were, and about periods and whatnot, but from my perspective it was more about bodily functions, like elimination, and I had no idea sex was a thing. (I knew that animals copulated, but human sex is far more complicated, baggage-ridden, and cultural than simply producing offspring — hence Why Don’t We Do It In The Road*) Obviously I had zero interest in doing it either. I don’t remember how I began to figure it out — I definitely wasn’t given a talk or anything, I think I just picked it up somehow, as kids of a certain age do — though I was a bit behind on it all; I think I was a bit of a late-bloomer as well, something few, save my parents, realised, as I always spoke and appeared older than my age.
I learned about the glorious Facts of Life when I was either nine or ten (I think ten) from a book given to me by my parents, which was a good way for me to find out, I think. I then underwent a highly traumatic “Family Life” unit in fifth grade that I still have not fully recovered from. Looking back, I probably would have been happier and just as well informed without sitting through that fifth-grade course. But it’s too late now.
When I picked up on the notion, I was quite repulsed by it and wanted absolutely nothing to do with it — a sentiment I still harbour to some extent; though I’m perfectly fine discussing sex and joking about it, I don’t want it in the slightest, and find the thought of getting it on with someone mildly disgusting.
That’s exactly how I feel about it.
First of all, children are children. They’re immature, naive, stupid, and aren’t really capable of making wise decisions. (I should know, I was one quite recently.) That’s why we have parents**, who protect and guide their children until the kids have reached an age to think for themselves. A wise parent protects no more or less than necessary, guides with discretion, and encourages kids to think for themselves from an early age. An unwise parent might not. Most parents probably err in some sense or another. But parents should have the right to make these decisions about their child’s education and upbringing, rather than it be relegated to some great, clumsy bureaucracy in the sky which must make generalisations, cannot account for individuals, and may even have some agenda to push. (Brainwash ’em early, while you’re weeping, while still a baby in your pram! )
True enough. Parents know their children and can probably, in most situations, make better decisions for/about them than the government.
It’s this parental freedom of choice which has allowed me to receive the type of education/childhood I have, so of course I have a personal stake in it. But it’s not just that: based on my past personal experience as a nine-to-fourteen-year-old, and as someone who has a ten-year-old sibling, to read suggestions of non-optional sex education which delves into adult relationships at eleven/twelve, pornography at fourteen, is utterly appalling to me. Perhaps you, Applescruffjunior, would have benefitted from that. Perhaps most children would, although I doubt it. But I can tell you that I, for one, would have been SCARRED. FOR. LIFE!
I know I was. But given the subject matter, that would be kind of unavoidable at any age (for me personally, not trying to speak for anyone else.)
The following people thank 50yearslate for this post:
BeatlebugLove one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019: 2020:
6.31pm
18 December 2017
50yearslate said
When I picked up on the notion, I was quite repulsed by it and wanted absolutely nothing to do with it — a sentiment I still harbour to some extent; though I’m perfectly fine discussing sex and joking about it, I don’t want it in the slightest, and find the thought of getting it on with someone mildly disgusting.
That’s exactly how I feel about it.
huh, it’s like, the opposite for me.
| | I don’t know how to put it here. hello for the love of god hello
~~~
The Concert for Bageldesh
~~~
Walrian here! Not Fiddy, or anyone else, actually.
6.45pm
1 November 2013
Parents are under less overhead than teachers. Means it is easier to a parent to share their biases uncontested than it would be for a teacher. If a teacher teaches x, a kid can go home and the parent can tell them y. Kid grows up and can decided between the two themselves. Parents also have their agendas that they push on their children.
Though this all depends on the specific parent/teacher, the above is more general.
sex is natural and people make way to big a deal out of it tbh. Parents should inform their children about it, not leave them in the dark. Part of that hidden aspect is why teen pregnancy is so high.
Abortion is a controversial thing, something that would reduce the need for it is information about sex. Talk about it, it shouldn’t be so taboo.
TheWalrusWasBrian said
50yearslate said
When I picked up on the notion, I was quite repulsed by it and wanted absolutely nothing to do with it — a sentiment I still harbour to some extent; though I’m perfectly fine discussing sex and joking about it, I don’t want it in the slightest, and find the thought of getting it on with someone mildly disgusting.
That’s exactly how I feel about it.
huh, it’s like, the opposite for me.
So you aren’t fine talking about or joking about sex but find doing it?
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
The Hole Got Fixed, Little Piggy DragonguyIf you can't log in and can't use the forum go here and someone will help you out.
6.49pm
18 December 2017
Starr Shine? said
TheWalrusWasBrian said
50yearslate said
When I picked up on the notion, I was quite repulsed by it and wanted absolutely nothing to do with it — a sentiment I still harbour to some extent; though I’m perfectly fine discussing sex and joking about it, I don’t want it in the slightest, and find the thought of getting it on with someone mildly disgusting.
That’s exactly how I feel about it.
huh, it’s like, the opposite for me.
So you aren’t fine talking about or joking about sex but find doing it?
No no no, i meant, I’m not at all repulsed or disgusted. Believe me, half of the things i say end up being sex jokes.
| | I don’t know how to put it here. hello for the love of god hello
~~~
The Concert for Bageldesh
~~~
Walrian here! Not Fiddy, or anyone else, actually.
7.32pm
5 November 2011
7.45pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Yes, I think so.
When I was fourteen, I avoided thinking about sex as much as possible.
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
7.48pm
5 November 2011
Parents that decide to keep their child from receiving sex education are not doing what is in best interest for their child. They should not be given that opportunity to take it away.
I would imagine it is much easier to keep a homeschooled child sheltered from the realities of human biology, but most children are not homeschooled. I first learned what sex is at about age seven after asking my mom about something I heard at daycare from an older kid (what he had said was completely off). She explained it to me correctly and answered questions I had. It wasn’t something traumatizing or information that took away my innocence or youth. I didn’t start having sex at a young age nor did I start watching porn.
If children are never spoken to about sex by an adult in their life, they are still going to find out about it, and many will still be having sex. It makes no sense that a parent would prefer for this information to be given to their child by a peer or the internet over a trusted adult. Part of sex education is teaching kids about healthy vs. toxic relationships, consent, and how to practice safe sex. These are all very important things for children to know about and understand. Like Starr Shine? said, teaching kids about these things has been proven successful at lowering pregnancy rates in teens.
A parent not wanting this information to be given to their child may keep their child sheltered for a short period of time, but most likely, they will only be keeping themselves sheltered from what knowledge their children have of sex and where their children are getting the information.
The following people thank Little Piggy Dragonguy for this post:
50yearslate, QuarryManAll living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
8.11pm
15 November 2018
Beatlebug said
Yes, I think so.When I was fourteen, I avoided thinking about sex as much as possible.
So did I. Still do, in fact. Health class last year was an absolute NIGHTMARE.
The following people thank 50yearslate for this post:
BeatlebugLove one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019: 2020:
9.07pm
18 December 2017
Little Piggy Dragonguy said
TheWalrusWasBrian said
No no no, i meant, I’m not at all repulsed or disgusted. Believe me, half of the things i say end up being sex jokes.
r u 14?
yes yes i am.
| | I don’t know how to put it here. hello for the love of god hello
~~~
The Concert for Bageldesh
~~~
Walrian here! Not Fiddy, or anyone else, actually.
9.11pm
5 November 2011
TheWalrusWasBrian said
yes yes i am.
okay thank you
50yearslate said
Beatlebug said
When I was fourteen, I avoided thinking about sex as much as possible. a-hard-days-night-paul-7So did I. Still do, in fact. Health class last year was an absolute NIGHTMARE.
What was so awful about it?
The following people thank Little Piggy Dragonguy for this post:
TheWalrusWasBrianAll living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
9.14pm
15 November 2018
Little Piggy Dragonguy said
TheWalrusWasBrian said
yes yes i am.
okay thank you
50yearslate said
Beatlebug said
When I was fourteen, I avoided thinking about sex as much as possible. a-hard-days-night-paul-7
So did I. Still do, in fact. Health class last year was an absolute NIGHTMARE.
What was so awful about it?
Many different things. The sex ed unit was very very very uncomfortable and I also happened to be in a class with the most immature batch of idiots you could imagine.
Love one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019: 2020:
11.52am
1 November 2013
Are any of you against GMO’s?
If you can't log in and can't use the forum go here and someone will help you out.
12.57pm
26 January 2017
Little Piggy Dragonguy said
Parents that decide to keep their child from receiving sex education are not doing what is in best interest for their child. They should not be given that opportunity to take it away.I would imagine it is much easier to keep a homeschooled child sheltered from the realities of human biology, but most children are not homeschooled. I first learned what sex is at about age seven after asking my mom about something I heard at daycare from an older kid (what he had said was completely off). She explained it to me correctly and answered questions I had. It wasn’t something traumatizing or information that took away my innocence or youth. I didn’t start having sex at a young age nor did I start watching porn.
If children are never spoken to about sex by an adult in their life, they are still going to find out about it, and many will still be having sex. It makes no sense that a parent would prefer for this information to be given to their child by a peer or the internet over a trusted adult. Part of sex education is teaching kids about healthy vs. toxic relationships, consent, and how to practice safe sex. These are all very important things for children to know about and understand. Like Starr Shine? said, teaching kids about these things has been proven successful at lowering pregnancy rates in teens.
A parent not wanting this information to be given to their child may keep their child sheltered for a short period of time, but most likely, they will only be keeping themselves sheltered from what knowledge their children have of sex and where their children are getting the information.
Well said. As well as this, it’s become pretty clear how important of an issue consent is to teach to children, since many adults even seem to struggle to deal with the concept.
The following people thank QuarryMan for this post:
Little Piggy DragonguyI've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
1 Guest(s)