2.48am
Moderators
27 November 2016
4.06am
5 November 2011
A pet peeve of mine is when people talk to me like I’m a child. Or treat me like one. I know I’m small, but I don’t need to be told that all the time or cooed at or be picked up. Some lady was telling my dad and his wife recently that they have “the most precious, sweetest little girl”. They thought she was talking about my five year old sister, but no. She was talking about a twenty year old.
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
11.50am
9 March 2017
This may seem very weird to hear from a man’s mouth but I was reading Ron Nasty’s post in the philosophy thread and it reminded me of a pet peeve of mine.
I hate how so many people/places/sites (even ones that are far left) say that when it comes to sexual consent yes is yes and no is no.
What really pisses me off about this statement is that yes doesn’t always mean yes, yes means no if the person is:
1. underage (this one should be obvious)
2. mentally incapable of giving consent
3. under the influence of alcohol and or drugs
4. coerced
5. uninterested but says yes anyways, either by saying it unenthusiastically or using fine or whatever as opposed to yes
As for no, no is always no.
What these things should be saying is “yes is yes if she is in the right mindset and genuinely wants it and no is always no”.
The following people thank Dark Overlord for this post:
BeatlebugIf you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
12.17pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Dark Overlord said
This may seem very weird to hear from a man’s mouth {snip}
Why?
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
12.31pm
9 March 2017
It’s something usually discussed by women, particularly feminists and while most of them would 100% agree with my statement, they typically simplify the statement to yes is yes and no is no, which undermines statutory rape by completely ignoring it and I think that’s a problem. By the way, this applies to both genders, as men can be raped as well as be victims of statutory rape.
If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
12.38pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
I think it sounds right coming from a male. Men should think about matters like that just as much as women.
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
1.36pm
1 November 2013
10.36pm
15 May 2015
Major pet peeve: Whenever drummers hit one of their crash cymbals, then a second or two (or three) later reflexively reach out to dampen the crash with their free hand. Why do that? The sizzling decrescendo of a crash cymbal is a great sound! Only very rarely should it be dampened (but, alas, it’s all too common…).
Throughout this long jam called “Savor” (and particularly during the long timbale solo toward the end) you can see drummer Michael Shrieve of Santana wonderfully letting his crash cymbals BREATHE all the &&&&ing time!
The following people thank Pineapple Records for this post:
Martha, BeatlebugA ginger sling with a pineapple heart,
a coffee dessert, yes you know it's good news...
12.17pm
9 March 2017
When you can’t hear the bass part. Just about every pop/rock band has a bassist (The Doors being a notable exception) and just about every pop/rock song has a bass part in it but unless if you have a subwoofer, you won’t be able to hear most of these bass parts pretty well and while some of them are just playing what the guitarist is playing or something very basic but sometimes these are real great bass parts that you don’t want to miss. A perfect example of this is just about every song on Rubber Soul , but especially Nowhere Man where the bass helps the music smoothly flow like an ocean but if you’re just having a casual listen to it, you won’t hear that great bassline and will miss out on the full experience. Who decided that we should have bassists but not easily be able to hear them without going out of your way to hear them.
The following people thank Dark Overlord for this post:
The Hole Got Fixed, Little Piggy Dragonguy, Martha, BeatlebugIf you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
7.35am
27 February 2017
@Pineapple Records said
Major pet peeve: Whenever drummers hit one of their crash cymbals, then a second or two (or three) later reflexively reach out to dampen the crash with their free hand. Why do that? The sizzling decrescendo of a crash cymbal is a great sound! Only very rarely should it be dampened (but, alas, it’s all too common…).Throughout this long jam called “Savor” (and particularly during the long timbale solo toward the end) you can see drummer Michael Shrieve of Santana wonderfully letting his crash cymbals BREATHE all the &&&&ing time!
A great song, thanks for posting it! Another great example of a breathing crash cymbal (love that expression) is Ringo in the Anthology 2 version of I’m Down .
One can also hear it in many songs from The Beatles Live At The Star Club, like this one:
One pet peeve I have is the Jimi Hendrix poster in our local library. It says Jimi Hendrix, 1945-1970…
The following people thank Martha for this post:
Pineapple RecordsNot once does the diversity seem forced -- the genius of the record is how the vaudevillian "When I'm 64" seems like a logical extension of "Within You Without You" and how it provides a gateway to the chiming guitars of "Lovely Rita. - Stephen T. Erlewine on Sgt Pepper's
8.04am
1 November 2013
4.58pm
15 May 2015
Thanks Martha, that photo montage was fascinating and the song so thoroughly expressing that roots of early rock which the Beatles obviously loved. I’d say however that Ringo’s use of cymbals there is not really what I’m referring to. It sounds like he’s basically using a crash as a ride cymbal — so he is letting it breathe, for sure (most of the time, I notice that when the guitars stop at one point he must have dampened the cymbals because there’s silence), but what I mean is the the moments in a song when the drummer hits the crash for momentary emphasis, rather than a non-stop stream of beats.
The following people thank Pineapple Records for this post:
Beatlebug, MarthaA ginger sling with a pineapple heart,
a coffee dessert, yes you know it's good news...
5.18pm
5 November 2011
7.43pm
9 March 2017
I don’t know if I’ve ever done one of these things before but I’m going to mention something I used to do but now regret.
I really hate how I used to be obsessed with what guitar model was used on what. Sometimes there’s confirmation of a certain Beatle using a certain guitar on a certain song but with most songs it’s just guesswork like what guitar George used on Back In The USSR , at the time he had Rocky, Lucy, his SG, his Casino, and a Gibson ES-5 and he could’ve used any of those guitars on that song and I’m not like Rob Chapman where I can tell apart a Les Paul and an SG without even thinking, I can barely tell a Les Paul apart from a Strat. Another thing I hate is that I let a tribute band using the wrong guitar ruin their cover of the song, like that’s so stupid, it’s not like they’re having Ringo sing She Loves You .
The following people thank Dark Overlord for this post:
BeatlebugIf you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
4.05pm
14 February 2016
Clothes that fit you nicely, but seem tight and constricting because you’re used to wearing baggy clothes.
It’s so uncomfortable, I mean, I could live in large t-shirts and Jnco jeans. (Oh wait, I already do )
The following people thank Evangeline for this post:
Ahhh Girl, Beatlebug, Ms. LaneI am you as you are you as you are you and you are all together.
8.03am
Moderators
15 February 2015
Dark Overlord said
When you can’t hear the bass part. Just about every pop/rock band has a bassist (The Doors being a notable exception) and just about every pop/rock song has a bass part in it but unless if you have a subwoofer, you won’t be able to hear most of these bass parts pretty well and while some of them are just playing what the guitarist is playing or something very basic but sometimes these are real great bass parts that you don’t want to miss. A perfect example of this is just about every song on Rubber Soul , but especially Nowhere Man where the bass helps the music smoothly flow like an ocean but if you’re just having a casual listen to it, you won’t hear that great bassline and will miss out on the full experience. Who decided that we should have bassists but not easily be able to hear them without going out of your way to hear them.
This has been one of my biggest, oldest pet peeves ever. I’m a bass-phile anyway so it bothers me. When I listen to music, if I can’t hear the bass, I just turn it off. Why bother?
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
9.16am
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Evangeline said
Clothes that fit you nicely, but seem tight and constricting because you’re used to wearing baggy clothes.
It’s so uncomfortable, I mean, I could live in large t-shirts and Jnco jeans. (Oh wait, I already do )
OOOH! That’s me as well. During the work week, it’s business casual. On my time, it’s loose fitting jeans or shorts along with a baggy t-shirt or sweatshirt – maybe a flannel shirt over that on cool days. I am also one who will literally wear out a t-s**t or sweat shirt until you can practically see through it. So comfy!!
I still wear a sweatshirt that I was wearing the day before my 6 month old nephew was Christened. He started college this past autumn.
The following people thank Zig for this post:
Ms. Lane, BeatlebugTo the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
10.03am
5 September 2017
12.57pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
I like clothes that fit me reasonably well, but I don’t like curve-hugging clothes. So I guess I’m somewhere in the middle.
Pet peeve: w*****s who feel the need to accelerate real hard as they go by so that their aftermarket tailpipes can deafen you. When you’re out innocuously walking down the street, with no ear protection, because you DON’T EXPECT TO DEAL WITH 90+ DECIBELS WHEN YOU’RE WALKING DOWN THE STREET OF A SUBURBAN NEIGHBOURHOOD. Fer feck’s sakes!
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Ms. Lane, The Hole Got Fixed([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
1.49pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Silly Girl said
Pet peeve: w*****s who feel the need to accelerate real hard as they go by so that their aftermarket tailpipes can deafen you. When you’re out innocuously walking down the street, with no ear protection, because you DON’T EXPECT TO DEAL WITH 90+ DECIBELS WHEN YOU’RE WALKING DOWN THE STREET OF A SUBURBAN NEIGHBOURHOOD. Fer feck’s sakes!
It’s especially annoying when you are on horseback – so my wife tells me.
The following people thank Zig for this post:
BeatlebugTo the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
2 Guest(s)