Log In
Register
4.20pm
14 February 2016
Offline
HMBeatlesfan said
This really pisses me off, if you go into a store, you will notice that there are just as many female razors as male ones, I mean do women really need razors just as badly as men because the last time I checked, razors were for shaving facial hair which only men have, so why do women need razors just as badly as men.
Did you flunk biology class? Because it sure sound like you did.
The following people thank Evangeline for this post:
Necko, BeatlebugI am you as you are you as you are you and you are all together.
9.57am
11 January 2017
Offline HMBeatlesfan said
This really pisses me off, if you go into a store, you will notice that there are just as many female razors as male ones, I mean do women really need razors just as badly as men because the last time I checked, razors were for shaving facial hair which only men have, so why do women need razors just as badly as men.
There are 3 areas woman like to shave:
1. legs
2. underarms
3. privates
I will write this using Star Wars analogies so you can understand it better because I know you’re not into this stuff:
1. Although they’re not as focused on as the boobs or ass, nice legs are nice to have on a girl and are like an added bonus, think of it like if they released the original Star Wars trilogy on Blu Ray and add the Boba Fett segment as a bonus, Boba Fett is like the legs, but they’re not nearly as much of a bonus if they’re hairy. Overall though, women focus on this area more than men care which makes believe that lesbians really like this area, but that’s getting past the point.
2. I couldn’t care less about this, girls just do it because they think men care about it.
3. This one is the main reason, having a shaved pussy is important and if yours is hairy, it turns men away, think of a shaved one like the original 1977 theatrical cut of Star Wars and the hairy one as the 1997 Special Edition, the hair strands are like the added CGI effects, like Han no longer shooting first and the CGI dinosaurs blocking the way in the scene where Luke’s riding the sandcrawler.
The following people thank Starr Test for this post:
HMBeatlesfan, HMBeatlesfan, HMBeatlesfan@starr-test (use starr-test to @t me)
11.26am
1 November 2013
Offline
Some women shave cause they like not having body hair. Males opinons don’t have to factor in.
Like how some guys shave their face because they don’t like hair on their chin. It isn’t always to impress some lady.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
Ahhh Girl, Little Piggy Dragonguy, AppleScruffJunior, WeepingAtlasCedars, Beatlebug
1.15pm
5 November 2011
Offline AppleScruffJunior said
I, me, mine had laser hair removal (seriously if you have the money do it, oh God do it- hundreds of hours have been saved in my life by not having to shave) so I rarely have to shave.
I can attest to laser hair removal being great, but I would never recommend it to anybody because it is torture.
I think the amount of women that shave just for men is the minority. It is socially unacceptable for girls to have leg/armpit/back/stomach/facial hair, so people who do not follow the social norm of shaving are seen as having a lack of care for their appearance. If I knew I wouldn’t be judged for it, I would never shave anything, but that’s not how life works.
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
1.22pm
Members
18 March 2013
Offline Little Piggy Dragonguy said
I can attest to laser hair removal being great, but I would never recommend it to anybody because it is torture.
I think the amount of women that shave just for men is the minority. It is socially unacceptable for girls to have leg/armpit/back/stomach/facial hair, so people who do not follow the social norm of shaving are seen as having a lack of care for their appearance. If I knew I wouldn’t be judged for it, I would never shave anything, but that’s not how life works.
When did you get it done? Some of the new machines are brilliant and you can have both your legs done in about 40 minutes with no pain/redness afterwards
I have really dark hair and light skin so I was perfect for laser hair removal and the only painful bit I found was my underarms because you could hear your hair being burnt off and you could smell it too (it’s rancid by the way).
It was only uncomfortable for the 5 minute my underarms were being done and they were fine afterwards just a bit sensitive.
And I agree with women almost needing to be hairless beauties by society (anything that isn’t hair on your head, eyebrows or eyelashes needs to go!). Sure it’s only been in the last 100 years that women’s hair has been thought of as “disgusting” and needing to be removed.
I remember going to Italy and practically none of the women shaved their armpits or legs, I almost shouted a few “you go girls” while I was there but I managed to contain myself 
.
The following people thank AppleScruffJunior for this post:
William Shears Campbell, Beatlebug
INTROVERTS UNITE! Separately....in your own homes!
***
Make Love, Not Wardrobes!
***
"Stop throwing jelly beans at me"- George Harrison
1.29pm
1 November 2013
Offline Shaving isn’t as weird as piercings. I don’t get the appeal of inflicting wounds and shoving bits of metal in the wound to stop it from healing.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
The Hole Got Fixed, Necko, Beatlebug2.45pm
23 July 2016
Offline Starr Test said
HMBeatlesfan said
This really pisses me off, if you go into a store, you will notice that there are just as many female razors as male ones, I mean do women really need razors just as badly as men because the last time I checked, razors were for shaving facial hair which only men have, so why do women need razors just as badly as men.There are 3 areas woman like to shave:
1. legs
2. underarms
3. privates
I will write this using Star Wars analogies so you can understand it better because I know you’re not into this stuff:
1. Although they’re not as focused on as the boobs or ass, nice legs are nice to have on a girl and are like an added bonus, think of it like if they released the original Star Wars trilogy on Blu Ray and add the Boba Fett segment as a bonus, Boba Fett is like the legs, but they’re not nearly as much of a bonus if they’re hairy. Overall though, women focus on this area more than men care which makes believe that lesbians really like this area, but that’s getting past the point.
2. I couldn’t care less about this, girls just do it because they think men care about it.
3. This one is the main reason, having a shaved pussy is important and if yours is hairy, it turns men away, think of a shaved one like the original 1977 theatrical cut of Star Wars and the hairy one as the 1997 Special Edition, the hair strands are like the added CGI effects, like Han no longer shooting first and the CGI dinosaurs blocking the way in the scene where Luke’s riding the sandcrawler.
Thanks, except LPD and ASJ implied that most women don’t shave their privates, really like the Star Wars analogies though, never would’ve thought to compare pubic hairs to special edition changes.
Maybe you should try posting more.
5.17pm
Members
18 March 2013
Offline ^ I did not imply that most women don’t ladygarden. I don’t know if the majority do or not (and frankly I don’t really care) because I don’t really ask every woman I meet to show me her crotch while I question if she waxes or shaves.
Now can we move onto something else that isn’t genitalia please 😛
The following people thank AppleScruffJunior for this post:
HMBeatlesfan
INTROVERTS UNITE! Separately....in your own homes!
***
Make Love, Not Wardrobes!
***
"Stop throwing jelly beans at me"- George Harrison
5.19pm
1 November 2013
Offline 5.25pm
Members
18 March 2013
Offline I have my ears pierced (the regular tiny stud piercing in the lobe).
I’d never get anything else though, I am not a fan of facial piercings and I think very few people can pull them off.
I’m very basic when it comes to any body modifications, I’d never get gauges or tattoos and only have my ear lobes pierced.
INTROVERTS UNITE! Separately....in your own homes!
***
Make Love, Not Wardrobes!
***
"Stop throwing jelly beans at me"- George Harrison
7.11pm
23 July 2016
Offline You know what really pisses me off, double EP’s. There a waste, why make a double EP when you could do one of these things.
1. Release it as a 12″ EP, may sound like a waste of vinyl, but considering maxi singles exist, this makes more sense
2. Release it as a 10″ EP, makes the most sense
3. Cram it into a single 7″ record, may seem impossible but considering there are 12″ LP’s with over 30 minutes per side, it is possible to get at least 30 minutes of music on a single 7″, 15 minutes per side
Let’s take the most popular double EP, The Beatles 1967 Magical Mystery Tour , and show you how it could be reduced to one record:
Side A: (9:56)
Magical Mystery Tour 2:48
I Am The Walrus 4:35
Side B: (9:06)
The Fool On The Hill 3:00
Flying 2:16
Blue Jay Way 3:50
Total Time=19:02
Very plausible for a single 7″ record if you ask me
Maybe you should try posting more.
7.17pm
Moderators
27 November 2016
Offline 
Sorry, just to nitpick: Blue Jay Way goes for 3:55, not 3:50. But I must say, MMT should have been released as an official LP, not an EP.
#AppleHoley2024: Make America Great For The First Time
2016 awards: 
2017 awards: 
2018 awards:
2019 awards: 
2020 awards:
2021 awards:
9.46pm
1 November 2013
Offline AppleScruffJunior said
I have my ears pierced (the regular tiny stud piercing in the lobe).I’d never get anything else though, I am not a fan of facial piercings and I think very few people can pull them off.
I’m very basic when it comes to any body modifications, I’d never get gauges or tattoos and only have my ear lobes pierced.
Thing I don’t get is, why is earlobe normal to create an open wound but it is suddenly weird if it is anywhere else.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
Beatlebug5.11am
31 March 2008
Offline
HMBeatlesfan said
You know what really pisses me off, double EP’s. There a waste, why make a double EP when you could do one of these things.1. Release it as a 12″ EP, may sound like a waste of vinyl, but considering maxi singles exist, this makes more sense
2. Release it as a 10″ EP, makes the most sense
3. Cram it into a single 7″ record, may seem impossible but considering there are 12″ LP’s with over 30 minutes per side, it is possible to get at least 30 minutes of music on a single 7″, 15 minutes per side
Let’s take the most popular double EP, The Beatles 1967 Magical Mystery Tour , and show you how it could be reduced to one record:
Side A: (9:56)
Magical Mystery Tour 2:48
I Am The Walrus 4:35
Side B: (9:06)
The Fool On The Hill 3:00
Flying 2:16
Blue Jay Way 3:50
Total Time=19:02
Very plausible for a single 7″ record if you ask me
You’d have to play the 7″ at 33rpm to get that much music on a disc, but the sound quality would suffer significantly – fidelity deteriorates the closer you get to the centre of the label (so 12″ is better than 7″), and having a slowly spinning disc would make the problem even worse.
Read up on inner groove distortion. This explains it better than I can: http://www.soundmattersblog.co…..planation/
A 10″ EP would have made more sense for MMT, but they weren’t too popular in the 60s and might have been harder to market. And a 12″/45rpm EP might have just highlighted how few songs there were.
The following people thank Joe for this post:
Zig, Evangeline, HMBeatlesfan, HMBeatlesfan, HMBeatlesfan, HMBeatlesfan, HMBeatlesfanCan buy me love! Please consider supporting the Beatles Bible on Amazon
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs
Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!
9.54am
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Offline Starr Shine? said
Shaving isn’t as weird as piercings. I don’t get the appeal of inflicting wounds and shoving bits of metal in the wound to stop it from healing.
And when did it become fashionable to wear small truck tires in one’s ears? Did I miss a meeting?
Although, this guy seems to have found a practical use for his gaping atrocity…
Can you hear me now?
The following people thank Zig for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog, The Hole Got Fixed, BeatlebugTo the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
12.24pm
19 October 2016
Offline What about tattoos, do people generally consider them to be “weird”?
1.54pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Offline Weird is a relative term, I guess. I wouldn’t do it only because I’ve seen too many old men with old tattoos that just look sad, pathetic and wrinkly. No thanks. Zag does have a cool one on her ankle. It features her horse and incorporates a pet adoption symbol – the one with the paw print on the palm of a hand. It’s quite impressive. The tattoo artist had a lot of fun helping her design it.
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
1.59pm
23 July 2016
Offline Joe said
HMBeatlesfan said
You know what really pisses me off, double EP’s. There a waste, why make a double EP when you could do one of these things.1. Release it as a 12″ EP, may sound like a waste of vinyl, but considering maxi singles exist, this makes more sense
2. Release it as a 10″ EP, makes the most sense
3. Cram it into a single 7″ record, may seem impossible but considering there are 12″ LP’s with over 30 minutes per side, it is possible to get at least 30 minutes of music on a single 7″, 15 minutes per side
Let’s take the most popular double EP, The Beatles 1967 Magical Mystery Tour , and show you how it could be reduced to one record:
Side A: (9:56)
Magical Mystery Tour 2:48
I Am The Walrus 4:35
Side B: (9:06)
The Fool On The Hill 3:00
Flying 2:16
Blue Jay Way 3:50
Total Time=19:02
Very plausible for a single 7″ record if you ask me
You’d have to play the 7″ at 33rpm to get that much music on a disc, but the sound quality would suffer significantly – fidelity deteriorates the closer you get to the centre of the label (so 12″ is better than 7″), and having a slowly spinning disc would make the problem even worse.
Read up on inner groove distortion. This explains it better than I can: http://www.soundmattersblog.co…..planation/
A 10″ EP would have made more sense for MMT, but they weren’t too popular in the 60s and might have been harder to market. And a 12″/45rpm EP might have just highlighted how few songs there were.
Thanks for replying and you’ve got some good points there, but for your claim about how 10″ EP’s weren’t common, Magical Mystery Tour was the only double EP released in 1967 and on top of that, The Beatles were well known for thinking outside of the box, so that’s a weak claim. Also, if they chose to let the quality deteriorate at the end of each side, it would work well for the outro of I Am The Walrus .
Maybe you should try posting more.
3.01pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline While there may have been a few, what would become known as, “maxi singles” in the ’60s (and I don’t know if there was any) as a format it did not emerge until the ’70s, @HMBeatlesfan. The same with 12-inch singles, which I remember starting to be released in the second half of the ’70s.
The 10-inch might have been a way to go, but did EMI have the facilities to press and make sleeves for the numbers needed for a Beatles release.
You make the point about them being able to think outside of the box. Too true. And they did, they came up with a double-EP whose gatefold sleeve also acted as the cover of a book. Something that hadn’t been done. Thinking outside the box.
That you’re not keen on the solution they came up with to release the six MMT songs in the UK doesn’t mean they were not original and innovative in the package they came up with.
I owned the Capitol album first, I far prefer the EP for its packaging.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
HMBeatlesfan"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
1 Guest(s)