Log In
Register
9.08am
23 July 2016
Offline
Starr Shine? said
It is more of a pay gape since the jobs women go to on average pay less.
Then the women should try out better paying jobs.
HMBeatlesfan said
However, I think that anything that gets you high should not be legal without a prescription from a doctor.so Starr Shine? followed up with
High isn’t as bad as drunk. And prescription drugs are far more likely to get you hooked on illegal hard drugs than
marijuana.
And prescription drugs should only be legal if prescribed by a doctor and there’s good reason to that, imagine being able to get Oxycontin or Vicodin off the shelf without a prescription.
Starr Shine? said
What makes drunk better than high?
With alcohol, hallucinations are rare, whereas marijuana is pretty much taken just to see them. I support the use of alcohol and tobacco and if anyone needs a replacement for marijuana, I recommend planting and smoking tobacco, as planted tobacco is better for you than store bought tobacco and marijuana.
Maybe you should try posting more.
9.14am
1 November 2013
Offline
Tobacco and achohal are more addictive than marijuana.
So your main problem is hallucinations?
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
The Hippie Chick, Beatlebug
9.53am
23 July 2016
Offline Yes it is, yes it is, yes it is, oh yes it is, yeah, yes it is, it’s true.
Maybe you should try posting more.
1.04pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Offline sgtpepper63 said
I wish I had the balls to say that.
Starr Test said
Me too.
And that’s why my vote for Most Willing To Voice Their Opinion is HMBeatlesfan.
Pet peeve: When someone asks you a question, you start explaining, and then it turns out that they weren’t listening the whole flippin’ time. 
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
William Shears Campbell, SgtPeppersBulldog, The Hole Got Fixed, HMBeatlesfan, HMBeatlesfan([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site! 
5.02pm
23 July 2016
Offline Here’s a pisser offer for me, people who claim they are musicians but don’t use actual instruments. Examples of this include “club music” (AKA that type of music that consists of loops that come to an ascending scale and then a breakdown), modern pop (I dare you to name me a pop song that’s been released in the past 10 years that uses actual instruments and an actual drummer), rap (especially when they suck so hard at singing that they need auto tune). People like Skrillex and Lil’ Wayne shouldn’t be allowed to call themselves musicians, they’re frauds that just steal other people’s music and fondle it and then call it their own. Sure, you try to fit people like Yoko Ono into this definition, but her music was new and inventive and she had people use actual instruments and on top of that, her music was labeled as experimental, unlike those DJ’s who fondle with songs like dogs biting mailmen. You could also try to put some Beatles songs in this definition, but that wouldn’t be right because the few songs where they do use samples (Yellow Submarine , Mr. Kite, etc.) is at a last resort and everything else is legit and even Revolution 9 contains a backing track of vocals, acoustic guitar, electric guitar, bass, and drums (but to be fair, Revolution 9 is somewhat of a precursor to the modern club music of today).
The following people thank HMBeatlesfan for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldogMaybe you should try posting more.
5.54pm
1 November 2013
Offline HMBeatlesfan said
(I dare you to name me a pop song that’s been released in the past 10 years that uses actual instruments and an actual drummer)
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
Necko, The Hippie Chick, The Hippie Chick7.44pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline Every generation comes a new type of music that members of the older generation dislikes claiming it not to be music in some way or other. William F. Buckley in 1964 said
“Let me say it, as evidence of my final measure of devotion to the truth: The Beatles are not merely awful, I would consider it sacrilegious to say anything less than that they are godawful. They are so unbelievably horrible, so appalling unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of the art they qualify as crowned heads of anti-music, even as the imposter popes went down in history as “anti-popes.” It helps a little bit to know that no one thinks they are more of a joke than the Beatles themselves, and one is relieved in supposing that they go to bed at night laughing at their utterly inexplicable success, if solemn at the thought that they must inhabit a world that features themselves.”
HMBeatlesfan said
You could also try to put some Beatles songs in this definition, but that wouldn’t be right because the few songs where they do use samples (Yellow Submarine, Mr. Kite, etc.) is at a last resort and everything else is legit and even Revolution 9 contains a backing track of vocals, acoustic guitar, electric guitar, bass, and drums (but to be fair, Revolution 9 is somewhat of a precursor to the modern club music of today).
‘Tomorrow Never Knows ‘ didn’t use them as a last resort, samples were integral to the track.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Necko, The Hippie Chick, Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars, WeepingAtlasCedars"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
8.46pm
23 July 2016
Offline School lockdown drills piss me off. How stupid do you have to be to know that when there’s an intruder somewhere, you should get the hell out, even a preschooler should know that. However, according to modern school systems, f**k common sense because nowadays, if there’s someone in the school who wants to kill you, instead of getting the hell out like a sane human being or even trying to harm the person, schools just want you to hide in the classroom. Holy s**t government, it’s a good thing I didn’t do this as a kid, I mean think about this. If you were in a grocery store and some guy with a gun came in just wanting to kill anybody in his path, would you stay in the store or make a run for it. If I were a mentally ill killer who wanted to shoot up an elementary school, I would go into the classrooms, break open the doors, and find the children and staff and shoot them dead and if I had a friend there who just happened to be a janitor at the school who would do anything for some cash, I would have him break all the locks so they could no longer be locked and if it were a high school and I had a friend who went there who wanted to tagalong, I would have either smuggle a weapon and kill the kids in the classroom while they were in lockdown or unlock the door so I could kill everybody else. The funny part is that the survivors of Sandy Hook survived by not abiding to the lockdown drill standards and instead getting out of the building, yet the school system ignores that and I have to learn from babysitting my friends children that when an intruder enters the school, you stay there. So for any teachers on this forum, don’t have your students do these stupid drills, just have them make a run for it instead.
Maybe you should try posting more.
8.53pm
Moderators
27 November 2016
Offline @HMBeatlesfan, you’ll find this stupid. Not only does my school do that, but if we have a fire drill, we go to the oval. When I asked a teacher ‘what happens if the fire is on the oval, or between us and the oval (very likely)?’ she replied that we should just try to make our way to the oval anyway.
We have two basketball courts side-by-side, and a gym! Why can’t we use them, for heaven sake?!
The following people thank The Hole Got Fixed for this post:
HMBeatlesfan, HMBeatlesfan#AppleHoley2024: Make America Great For The First Time
2016 awards: 
2017 awards: 
2018 awards:
2019 awards: 
2020 awards:
2021 awards:
9.35pm
1 November 2013
Offline HMBeatlesfan said
School lockdown drills piss me off. How stupid do you have to be to know that when there’s an intruder somewhere, you should get the hell out,
Because a bunch of people running around are easy prey for a shooter.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
Ron Nasty, Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars, WeepingAtlasCedars10.30pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline HMBeatlesfan said
School lockdown drills piss me off. How stupid do you have to be to know that when there’s an intruder somewhere, you should get the hell out…
How stupid do you need to be to know you should not leave an area that can be secured to run around in some place you don’t know where the shooter is? Of course lockdown is right. You want kids running out where there could be (a) shooter(s). Your suggestion is, Put yourself in a possible line of fire and hope for the best, rather than hunker down in a room you can secure and wait for the authorities to get there.
I think lockdown gives the better odds…
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
moriz, Necko, Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
12.04am
2 November 2016
Offline Being in an enclosed space like that may seem like a stupid idea, but it does give you a better chance of survival for various reasons. For one, it’s easier to hear a shooter coming if everything is quiet. That might give your teacher (or school officer if you have one) an opportunity to disarm them if they attempt to come into the room. It’s also faster to evacuate small groups of children a few at a time rather than having everyone run around loudly so that the intruder knows exactly where they are…
I do find it stupid how most schools only have one fire drill plan. Instead of telling students where all the exits are and where they could go if one or more of them were blocked off, they only show you how to get to one exit and tell you not to try to go anywhere else. There actually was a fire at one of my schools when I was younger, and this stupid practice led to some kids getting hurt because they didn’t know where to go when they couldn’t escape through their “assigned exit.”
The following people thank moriz for this post:
Beatlebug4.46am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline Not entirely sure how wild mad chaos is the best form of safety and protection in such a situation of a shooting.
I’m all for flexible rules and nothing being cast in stone and buried 10ft in the ground but if there is a gunman on the rampage I’m hiding. No chance I’m running down corridors or across open spaces where I can be shot it.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
WeepingAtlasCedars"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
6.25am
1 November 2013
Offline Plus, playing dead is a great plan when faced with a spree shooter.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
moriz6.54am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline If someone wants to run about making noises and getting a gunperson’s attention please do so by going as fast and as loud as possible in the opposite direction from me. As a thank you I’ll buy you a coffee after or attend your funeral – depending on whether you survive obviously, not much point buying you a coffee if you are dead.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
moriz, Beatlebug, pepperland"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
7.59pm
23 July 2016
Offline This one really pisses me off, a lack of modesty. For females, sometimes they’re too damn lazy to wear pants, so they invented the dress, which would be fine if it actually covered the parts of your body your pants cover, but some dresses are so short, they look like a shirt and you have to see their underwear. For males, put on a shirt, if I walk around on a hot day, I’ll sometimes see men without their shirts on doing yardwork or something. The funny part is that although a female doesn’t have to wear pants and a male doesn’t have to wear a shirt, if a male doesn’t wear pants or a female doesn’t wear a shirt, they get in trouble. I wonder who came up with this logic, some rapper, a drunk courtroom with people who deliberately placed bad votes because they didn’t want to do jury duty, I really wonder. Anyways, men, put on a shirt when you’re outside and girls, if your dress goes higher up than Dorothy’s from The Wizard Of Oz, put on some pants.
The following people thank HMBeatlesfan for this post:
Little Piggy Dragonguy, Starr TestMaybe you should try posting more.
8.09pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline Waiting and i don’t mean in queues or stuff in the post.
Sorry to all those who see it as some kind of personality and character boosting privilege of life but it’s a pain in the ass, especially if a) the reality is rarely as good as the anticipation and b) often what you are waiting for never bloody comes.
Sometimes I think im going crazy
But I am waiting patiently
Though I fear it will all be in vain‘The Second Day’ – Kendall Payne
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
HMBeatlesfan, HMBeatlesfan, The Hole Got Fixed, Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars, WeepingAtlasCedars"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
9.22pm
1 November 2013
Offline HMBeatlesfan said
This one really pisses me off, a lack of modesty. For females, sometimes they’re too damn lazy to wear pants, so they invented the dress, which would be fine if it actually covered the parts of your body your pants cover, but some dresses are so short, they look like a shirt and you have to see their underwear.
Funny, in some areas, dresses are considered the more modest option.
For males, put on a shirt, if I walk around on a hot day, I’ll sometimes see men without their shirts on doing yardwork or something. The funny part is that although a female doesn’t have to wear pants and a male doesn’t have to wear a shirt, if a male doesn’t wear pants or a female doesn’t wear a shirt, they get in trouble. I wonder who came up with this logic, some rapper, a drunk courtroom with people who deliberately placed bad votes because they didn’t want to do jury duty, I really wonder.
In Scotland, if a man doesn’t wear pants, it is just a regular Tuesday.
Anyways, men, put on a shirt when you’re outside and girls, if your dress goes higher up than Dorothy’s from The Wizard Of Oz, put on some pants.
Modesty is an interesting thing, it changes rapidly with the times. I wonder in 50 years, what the children of today will call non-modest?
10.06pm
5 November 2011
Offline What makes me mad is that it’s not okay for women to be shirtless in public. If that were socially acceptable, I would never wear a shirt.
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
1 Guest(s)