10.41am
1 November 2013
One thing I don’t get with guns is if people buy them for protection, hunting and to make a militia, then why isn’t gun training required to own a gun? Cars require training because they can be a danger to others and themselves which is the same with guns. With training, people would be able to better use the guns for protection.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
trcanberra, UnidentifiedFiendishThingy, BeatlebugIf you can't log in and can't use the forum go here and someone will help you out.
2.50pm
19 September 2010
Zig said
mr. Sun king coming together said
Other note: The US is the only country that doesn’t respond to something like this.
I beg to differ. There is always a response. Unfortunately the N.R.A. (Neanderthal Retarded A******s) responds in a larger way by lining the pockets of and providing favors for politicians.
Makes me want to puke.
That’s a better way of saying it. I meant the laws don’t respond. You’re right that the people do.
The following people thank mr. Sun king coming together for this post:
ZigAs if it matters how a man falls down.'
'When the fall's all that's left, it matters a great deal.
7.32pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Wigwam said
…….And most of us Brits don’t know that the American Constitution was almost a perfect re-drafting of the English Bill of Rights 1689. Which also included the right for all to bear arms . ….James 11 having earlier disarmed the protestants.
Being curious, I had to go take a look at the Bill of Rights of 1689 about the gun laws.
Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counsellors, judges and ministers employed by him, did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom;…
By causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law;And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare…
That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;
Very interesting. Thanks for bringing it up, Wigwam.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
Wigwam, OudisCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
7.49pm
17 October 2013
Ahhh Girl said
Wigwam said
…….And most of us Brits don’t know that the American Constitution was almost a perfect re-drafting of the English Bill of Rights 1689. Which also included the right for all to bear arms . ….James 11 having earlier disarmed the protestants.
Being curious, I had to go take a look at the Bill of Rights of 1689 about the gun laws.
Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counsellors, judges and ministers employed by him, did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom;…
By causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law;And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare…
That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;Very interesting. Thanks for bringing it up, Wigwam.
This was performed for American audiences who could see the truth and the funny side behind it……..Good humour does that.
Great arguments but…..
I think it’s good to keep it light on here…..So here’s Eddie. If you like him check out one of the lego ‘Death Star canteen’ vids
Edit…both contain coarse language so be warned.
5.17am
17 October 2013
10.37am
18 April 2013
I’m really happy that the USA has legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states. I have a lot of gay friends and I’m very happy for them. It’s nice to see my country taking steps forward for once!
The following people thank Expert Textpert for this post:
Starr Shine?, Beatlebug, Ron Nasty, Beatleva, UnidentifiedFiendishThingy"If you're ever in the shit, grab my tit.” —Paul McCartney
1.43pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
We have? Oh, I didn’t know that… that’s good.
And what Stella’s t-shirt said when Paul was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame…
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
3.20pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
The decision by the US Supreme Court on same-sex marriage is remarkable but has to be put into context. In many ways the US now has to run to catch up with its equality laws now. Most countries had strong legal protections against discrimination of their LGBT citizens in place long before they reached the decision to legalise same-sex marriage. Sadly this is not true of the US. In only 22 States is it against the law to fire or evict someone because they are homosexual, or to not offer them the job or home because they are homosexual. Three of those States do not extend those protections to their transgender citizens.
What the US needs now is the equivalent of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to offer federal protections to their LGBT citizens where States refuse. Given the make-up of the Senate and Congress at the moment, and the huge political weight of the religious far-right, the chances of such a Bill being proposed and passed seems somewhere between nil and zero.
Until there is national protection even this huge step is not as big as it might seem, and – just as there have been those looking to overturn Roe v Wade since 1973 – there will now be those looking to overturn Obergefell v Hodges. Until you are protected from being sacked or losing your home if you get married, including by the State were you employed by the State, it remains only job part done…
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
UnidentifiedFiendishThingy"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
4.38pm
27 March 2015
I was very happy to hear that bit of news today. I’ve been a huge LGBT supporter for as long as I can remember. It’s just always seemed perfectly logical to me that everyone should be able to love and marry the person of their choice, regardless of gender. I’m definitely not an exception in my country, given the fact that in 2001, the Netherlands was the first nation to have full marriage equality.
I’ve made several gay friends in the recent years, which made the cause more tangible for me. Not that any of my friends are American, but still. I realise there’s still a lot of ground to cover, but at least the USA has started to arrive in the 21st century.
The following people thank Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^< for this post:
Beatlebug, parlanceFormerly Known As JPM-Fangirl -- 2016
'Out There' - 07-06-2015 - Ziggo Dome Amsterdam -- 'One On One' - 12-06-2016 - Pinkpop Festival Landgraaf
8.03pm
17 February 2015
5.11pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
The Forth Road Bridge in Scotland has been granted World Heritage Status and is now a site of universal beauty report the BBC.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
12.49pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
1.36pm
22 September 2014
1.52am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
I don’t know where else to post this.
I am a Londoner, I was born opposite Dockhead Fire Station, in Bermondsey, South London. I am very proud to be a Londoner.
Ten years ago today, just before 9am, it started to be reported that there had been a power surge on London’s underground railway (we call it the Tube).
Within the hour, a bus blew apart in Tavistock Square. We then knew it was not a power surge, that our beautiful city was under attack. Muslims, Christians, Jews, Atheists and non-believers had been attacked by scum. By scum. I will not name them, because they do not deserve a name. No more than he who shot John, Christian abortion clinic bombers, IRA and Unionist bombers. Anyone who thinks these scum represent anything but their own twisted and abominable views should be ashamed.
My city was attacked by four worthless scum who DO NOT REPRESENT THE FAITH OF ISLAM.
Let us today remember all those of the professed faith they disrespected, of other faiths, and of no faith. They are scum. Worthless scum.
I cannot list all the hundreds of injured, many of whom had their lives changed forever by the actions of four pieces of scum who represented no religion.
We remember the dead of every faith and none:
Aldgate (tube bomb)
Lee Baisden (34)
Benedetta Ciaccia (30)
Richard Ellery (21)
Richard Gray (41)
Anne Moffat (48)
Fiona Stevenson (29)
Carrie Taylor (24)
Edgware Road (tube bomb)
Michael Stanley Brewster (52)
Jonathan Downey (34)
David Graham Foulkes (22)
Colin William Morley (52)
Jennifer Vanda Nicholson (24)
Laura Webb (29)
Russell Square (tube bomb)
James Adams (32)
Samantha Badham (35)
Phillip Beer (22)
Anna Brandt (41)
Ciaran Cassidy (22)
Elizabeth Daplyn (26)
Arthur Frederick (60)
Emily Jenkins (24)
Adrian Johnson (37)
Helen Jones (28)
Karolina Gluck (29)
Gamze Gunoral (24)
Lee Harris (30)
Ojara Ikeagwu (56)
Susan Levy (53)
Shelley Mather (25)
Michael Matsushita (37)
James Mayes (28)
Behnaz Mozakka (47)
Mihaela Otto (46)
Atique Sharifi (24)
Ihab Slimane (24)
Christian Small (28)
Monika Suchoka (23)
Mala Trivedi (51)
Rachell Chung For Yuen (27)
Tavistock Square (bus bomb)
Anthony Fatayi-Williams (26)
Jamie Gordon (30)
Giles Hart (55)
Marie Hartley (34)
Miriam Hyman (31)
Shahara Islam (20)
Neetu Jain (37)
Sam Ly (28)
Shayanuja Parathasangarary (30)
Anat Rosenberg (39)
Philip Russell (28)
William Wise (54)
Gladys Wundowa (50)
"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
6.36am
1 November 2013
^ Why mention their religion and everyone’s religion. What does it matter in this context?
If you can't log in and can't use the forum go here and someone will help you out.
9.23am
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Ron Nasty said
Ten years ago today, just before 9am…our beautiful city was under attack.
Let us today remember…the dead of every faith…
They will be in my thoughts.
The following people thank Zig for this post:
Ron NastyTo the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
10.56am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Its illegal again in the UK to buy a cd and rip it to your computer or play it on your ipod, in your car etc.
How on earth are they meant to enforce such a ruling? Random checks on the road where you are pulled over to the side and asked to prove that the song you are singing along to wasnt first bought on cd and then copied over? Morning house raids to ensure the music on your laptop is not from a cd?
Its as likely to be enforced as arresting someone in England for eating a mince pie on the 25th December. Thankfully i’m in Scotland where it is legal to do so. My country is immense.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Oudis"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
11.06am
24 March 2014
11.34am
1 November 2013
That’s just as unenforceable as the ban on trolling in Arizona
If you can't log in and can't use the forum go here and someone will help you out.
11.59am
17 October 2013
Annadog40 said
^ Why mention their religion and everyone’s religion. What does it matter in this context?
Not sure I understand your question…….Unless you’re distancing the bombers completely from mainstream Islam.
If the bombers had carried out their attacks in the name of something other than religion we would note their motivation ……. It’s absolutely right that we do so in this context too.
Islam is being twisted into a religious death cult. I believe it could do more itself to combat this amongst its brethren.
RIP those that died and the ones shot in America yesterday.
4 Guest(s)