8.12pm
7 August 2010
6.49pm
7 August 2010
7.08pm
1 May 2010
7.18pm
7 August 2010
7.28pm
1 May 2010
Dear Prudence said:
GniknuS said:
Was it 1962 or 1964? I saw 1964 a few years ago and they were pretty spectacular. Their mannerisms and stage presence were both perfect!
1964, the 2 was a typo,and it was good wasent it?
Yeah, if the Beatles would have grown into 4 middle aged, slightly overweight moptops, they would have looked exactly like 1964. I remember I watched “Ringo” pretty much the entire show, and he looked and played like Ringo, especially when he would kind of tilt his head to the side and just bash away.
I sat on a rug, biding my time, drinking her wine
7.32pm
7 August 2010
GniknuS said:
Dear Prudence said:
GniknuS said:
Was it 1962 or 1964? I saw 1964 a few years ago and they were pretty spectacular. Their mannerisms and stage presence were both perfect!
1964, the 2 was a typo,and it was good wasent it?
Yeah, if the Beatles would have grown into 4 middle aged, slightly overweight moptops, they would have looked exactly like 1964. I remember I watched “Ringo” pretty much the entire show, and he looked and played like Ringo, especially when he would kind of tilt his head to the side and just bash away.
I know! My eyes couldent leave him, He was playing his part really well.
Dear Prudence
Giving you quality -Facepalms- , since August 7, 2010.
1 Guest(s)