4.00am
17 January 2016
I have personally always considered Rubber Soul the “transitional” album. The last of the “early” sound I guess.
“She wasn't doing a thing that I could see, except standing there leaning on the balcony railing, holding the universe together.” - J.D. Salinger
8.16am
9 March 2017
I don’t see much difference between Beatles For Sale , Help !, and Rubber Soul , besides that the songs on Rubber Soul are of a better quality. People often point out the sitar on Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown) but that’s only 1 song and even then, the sitar was an afterthought.
For me, Revolver is the transitional album, as it features tons of stuff the earlier albums didn’t do (reversed guitar, varispeed, guest musicians, tape loops, songs missing Beatles, songs missing key instruments) while still having 14 tracks and sticking to the 1:45 to 3:00 timeframe and having that early Beatles sound.
If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
9.48am
26 January 2017
Dark Overlord said
I don’t see much difference between Beatles For Sale , Help !, and Rubber Soul , besides that the songs on Rubber Soul are of a better quality. People often point out the sitar on Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown) but that’s only 1 song and even then, the sitar was an afterthought.For me, Revolver is the transitional album, as it features tons of stuff the earlier albums didn’t do (reversed guitar, varispeed, guest musicians, tape loops, songs missing Beatles, songs missing key instruments) while still having 14 tracks and sticking to the 1:45 to 3:00 timeframe and having that early Beatles sound.
Revolver is a huge step forward for sure, but it’s building on what Rubber Soul had done before it. Rubber Soul was their first conceptual album designed to stand as a complete piece of art rather than a collection of songs. The use of sitar, fuzz bass, harmonium, the motown instrumentation on Drive My Car , and the sped up piano solo on In My Life showed them using the studio to its potential and trying out new sounds and instruments. It was their first album of all original material since A Hard Day’s Night , featured Ringo’s first credit, and the George songs were arguably the first to truly compete with the Lennon-McCartney team. The songwriting was for the first time more focused with storytelling (Drive My Car , Norwegian Wood ) and philosophical themes (Nowhere Man , The Word ) than simple love songs. Plus the cover marks a clear difference from what they’d had before, and doesn’t have the word ‘Beatles’ on.
I've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
10.23am
26 January 2017
Revolver absolutely does not have the early Beatles sound. Neither does Rubber Soul . The lyrical content and the way they used harmony changed completely. While they had been doing complex harmony on PPM and beyond, they began to really emphasize the 3 part harmony, and the production quality really locked in. Plus in terms of the progression of their harmony they started taking in a wider pool of influences that they previously had, resulting in more diverse tunes and progressions. Several tecniques in changing tape speed also contributed to a more advanced sound as well.
On top of that their lifestyle had very much changed by that time. The touring years ended the same month as the release of Revolver and they were lookig for new ways to satisfy themselves through foreign art, psychedelic drugs, and the general swinging culture of London. These things also found their way into Beatles music and changed the way their music sounded.
If you really think that Revolver sounds like an early Beatles album you need to listen again, or get more familiar with the earlier albums.
The following people thank sir walter raleigh for this post:
QuarryMan, Shamrock Womlbs, Von Bontee"The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles!"
-Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues
"We could ride and surf together while our love would grow"
-Brian Wilson, Surfer Girl
11.02am
24 March 2014
Dark Overlord said
[…]
For me, Revolver is the transitional album, as it features tons of stuff the earlier albums didn’t do (reversed guitar, varispeed, guest musicians, tape loops, songs missing Beatles, songs missing key instruments) while still having 14 tracks and sticking to the 1:45 to 3:00 timeframe and having that early Beatles sound.
Except for tape loops, varispeed and reversed guitars Help ! Has all of the above…
The following people thank Shamrock Womlbs for this post:
sir walter raleigh"I Need You by George Harrison"
11.58am
15 November 2018
I’m a little ashamed to admit that my definitions of “early” “middle” and “late” were partially influenced by the appearances of the Beatles, in which case the transition was facial hair. Musically, I’d divide it like this:
Early: Please Please Me , With The Beatles , A Hard Day’s Night , Beatles For Sale
Middle/Transitional: Help , Rubber Soul , Revolver , Sgt Pepper , MMT
Late: The Beatles, Yellow Submarine , Abbey Road , Let It Be
The following people thank 50yearslate for this post:
QuarryManLove one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019: 2020:
2.35pm
9 March 2017
sir walter raleigh said
Revolver absolutely does not have the early Beatles sound. Neither does Rubber Soul . The lyrical content and the way they used harmony changed completely. While they had been doing complex harmony on PPM and beyond, they began to really emphasize the 3 part harmony, and the production quality really locked in. Plus in terms of the progression of their harmony they started taking in a wider pool of influences that they previously had, resulting in more diverse tunes and progressions. Several tecniques in changing tape speed also contributed to a more advanced sound as well.On top of that their lifestyle had very much changed by that time. The touring years ended the same month as the release of Revolver and they were lookig for new ways to satisfy themselves through foreign art, psychedelic drugs, and the general swinging culture of London. These things also found their way into Beatles music and changed the way their music sounded.
If you really think that Revolver sounds like an early Beatles album you need to listen again, or get more familiar with the earlier albums.
A lot of this i’m thinking from a technical standard. With Rubber Soul and Revolver , The Beatles were still locked into that 2 14 tracks albums a year with songs ranging from 1:45 to 3:00 in length.
Also, even if you don’t think Rubber Soul has that early Beatles sound, you have to admit it sounds different compared to Sgt. Pepper .
Shamrock Womlbs said
Except for tape loops, varispeed and reversed guitars Help ! Has all of the above…
But Revolver does them far more often.
If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
3.18pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
You have to look at it from the point of view of them learning to play their instruments, and view the studio as another instrument.
Up until Rubber Soul they considered their songs, pretty much, as live performances. From RS on they started leaving behind songs that could be easily recreated live, as well as the already evident effect Dylan had had on them lyrically, particularly John, starting to increasingly impact the themes they explored, taking them away from the simple boy-meets-girls themes of the past.
It is that testing of the studio as an instrument and their increasing lyrical confidence, both of which they grew increasingly adventurous with, that marked the point of transition where they abandoned live performance and marched into the studio years, though with the annoyance of having to wade through another year of touring obligations where they could play little of their recent work because the technology was a long way away from reproducing studio effects live.
For that reason RS is the pivot point between Beatlemania and Pepper. Pepper would never have been produced in the way it was if they were still a live band, and RS was where they started not being satisfied by what they could do live and what they could do on the stage.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Dark Overlord, Von Bontee"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
3.22pm
26 January 2017
Ron Nasty said
You have to look at it from the point of view of them learning to play their instruments, and view the studio as another instrument.Up until Rubber Soul they considered their songs, pretty much, as live performances. From RS on they started leaving behind songs that could be easily recreated live, as well as the already evident effect Dylan had had on them lyrically, particularly John, starting to increasingly impact the themes they explored, taking them away from the simple boy-meets-girls themes of the past.
It is that testing of the studio as an instrument and their increasing lyrical confidence, both of which they grew increasingly adventurous with, that marked the point of transition where they abandoned live performance and marched into the studio years, though with the annoyance of having to wade through another year of touring obligations where they could play little of their recent work because the technology was a long way away from reproducing studio effects live.
For that reason RS is the pivot point between Beatlemania and Pepper. Pepper would never have been produced in the way it was if they were still a live band, and RS was where they started not being satisfied by what they could do live and what they could do on the stage.
I agree, but with this way of looking at it it’s important not to leave out Help ! in the discussion. Both Yesterday and You’ve Got To Hide Your Love Away are early and perfect examples of their songs becoming more than live performances through the studio.
The following people thank QuarryMan for this post:
Shamrock WomlbsI've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
4.53pm
9 March 2017
Good point @Ron Nasty Rubber Soul is definitely a step up from Help ! in that sense, although Revolver and Sgt. Pepper are far bigger steps up.
Since we’re on the topic, have you guys noticed how Paul’s bass playing improved on Rubber Soul compared to earlier albums.
If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
5.24pm
15 November 2018
Definitely. The bass on Nowhere Man and Think For Yourself is sublime.
Love one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019: 2020:
5.30pm
26 January 2017
50yearslate said
Definitely. The bass on Nowhere Man and Think For Yourself is sublime.
Also Drive My Car . You can definitely hear the Motown influence on that one.
I've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
5.37pm
15 November 2018
QuarryMan said
Also Drive My Car . You can definitely hear the Motown influence on that one.
Isn’t that George though?
George was also quite a good bassist though, as one can see by listening to Two Of Us and Maxwell’s Silver Hammer .
Love one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019: 2020:
5.45pm
26 January 2017
50yearslate said
Isn’t that George though?
George was also quite a good bassist though, as one can see by listening to Two Of Us and Maxwell’s Silver Hammer .
According to Ian MacDonald bass was handled by Paul. I’ll see what Joe has to say on the matter.
I've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
5.53pm
15 November 2018
5.56pm
26 January 2017
Whoops sorry @QuarryMan ! Looks like I was mistaken… (I could have sworn I read that George played it somewhere…. )
I thought you might have been right actually, since Paul plays a lead guitar line on this too, which I was aware of, so I thought maybe he’d left the bass to George. Looks like he overdubbed it though.
I've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
5.57pm
Moderators
27 November 2016
Also You Won’t See Me and and In My Life . Who thinks of that sort of a bassline? So awesome!
The following people thank The Hole Got Fixed for this post:
QuarryMan#AppleHoley2024: Make America Great For The First Time
2016 awards: 2017 awards: 2018 awards: 2019 awards: 2020 awards: 2021 awards:
6.02pm
15 November 2018
I don’t think there’s such a thing as a bad bass line on Rubber Soul .
Now I want to listen to Rubber Soul …
The following people thank 50yearslate for this post:
The Hole Got FixedLove one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019: 2020:
6.04pm
9 March 2017
George doubled Paul’s bassline on Drive My Car on his Fender.
If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
6.05pm
26 January 2017
The Hole Got Fixed said
Also You Won’t See Me and and In My Life . Who thinks of that sort of a bassline? So awesome!
I once had someone try to tell me that the Beatles weren’t good musicians by saying ‘name one memorable McCartney bass line”. I made sure to give them an extensive list.
The following people thank QuarryMan for this post:
The Hole Got FixedI've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
1 Guest(s)