Log In
Register
3.15pm
3 February 2014
Offline
Hello everybody. I recently purchased the mono box set, and I really like how Rubber Soul sounds in mono, especially since the 2009 stereo remaster sounded quite uneven to me. The original ’65 stereo mix included in the set doesn’t sound too bad to me either, but what do all of you think? Do you prefer mono or stereo when it comes to Rubber Soul , and which of the stereo mixes do you prefer? Also, does anybody know why the 2009 stereo remasters of Help ! and Rubber Soul use the 1987 remix instead of the original master tapes. Thank you.
4.47pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline AbbeyRoadRage said
Hello everybody. I recently purchased the mono box set, and I really like how Rubber Soul sounds in mono, especially since the 2009 stereo remaster sounded quite uneven to me. The original ’65 stereo mix included in the set doesn’t sound too bad to me either, but what do all of you think? Do you prefer mono or stereo when it comes to Rubber Soul , and which of the stereo mixes do you prefer? Also, does anybody know why the 2009 stereo remasters of Help ! and Rubber Soul use the 1987 remix instead of the original master tapes. Thank you.
George Martin didn’t like the original ’65 mixes when it came to releasing the cd’s for ’87 so he did new ones which have become the standards ever since. There is an interview floating about from that time with George M speaking about it, i have no idea where.
I prefer the ’65 ones.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
5.22pm
20 December 2010
Offline I also prefer the 1965 Stereo mix of Rubber Soul . Too much reverb added in the remix from ’87.
Regarding mono versus stereo, I love the mono mixes. They always seem to have a little more punch to them.
The further one travels, the less one knows
5.45pm
Reviewers
29 November 2012
Offline
I prefer the mono mixes of every Beatles album that has them (everything up to and including the White Album ).
The following people thank DrBeatle for this post:
Vera Chuck and Dave"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"
Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist
Twitter: @rocknrollchem
Facebook: rnrchemist
5.48pm
3 February 2014
Offline meanmistermustard said
AbbeyRoadRage said
Hello everybody. I recently purchased the mono box set, and I really like how Rubber Soul sounds in mono, especially since the 2009 stereo remaster sounded quite uneven to me. The original ’65 stereo mix included in the set doesn’t sound too bad to me either, but what do all of you think? Do you prefer mono or stereo when it comes to Rubber Soul , and which of the stereo mixes do you prefer? Also, does anybody know why the 2009 stereo remasters of Help ! and Rubber Soul use the 1987 remix instead of the original master tapes. Thank you.George Martin didn’t like the original ’65 mixes when it came to releasing the cd’s for ’87 so he did new ones which have become the standards ever since. There is an interview floating about from that time with George M speaking about it, i have no idea where.
I prefer the ’65 ones.
I see… I’ll have to find that interview then. Thanks.
5.52pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline 
AbbeyRoadRage said
meanmistermustard said
AbbeyRoadRage said
Hello everybody. I recently purchased the mono box set, and I really like how Rubber Soul sounds in mono, especially since the 2009 stereo remaster sounded quite uneven to me. The original ’65 stereo mix included in the set doesn’t sound too bad to me either, but what do all of you think? Do you prefer mono or stereo when it comes to Rubber Soul , and which of the stereo mixes do you prefer? Also, does anybody know why the 2009 stereo remasters of Help ! and Rubber Soul use the 1987 remix instead of the original master tapes. Thank you.George Martin didn’t like the original ’65 mixes when it came to releasing the cd’s for ’87 so he did new ones which have become the standards ever since. There is an interview floating about from that time with George M speaking about it, i have no idea where.
I prefer the ’65 ones.
I see… I’ll have to find that interview then. Thanks.
A two second search brought it, well one, up. Sorry, i should have done it earlier but was otherwise engaged.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Bongo"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
5.59pm
3 February 2014
Offline meanmistermustard said
AbbeyRoadRage said
meanmistermustard said
AbbeyRoadRage said
Hello everybody. I recently purchased the mono box set, and I really like how Rubber Soul sounds in mono, especially since the 2009 stereo remaster sounded quite uneven to me. The original ’65 stereo mix included in the set doesn’t sound too bad to me either, but what do all of you think? Do you prefer mono or stereo when it comes to Rubber Soul , and which of the stereo mixes do you prefer? Also, does anybody know why the 2009 stereo remasters of Help ! and Rubber Soul use the 1987 remix instead of the original master tapes. Thank you.George Martin didn’t like the original ’65 mixes when it came to releasing the cd’s for ’87 so he did new ones which have become the standards ever since. There is an interview floating about from that time with George M speaking about it, i have no idea where.
I prefer the ’65 ones.
I see… I’ll have to find that interview then. Thanks.
A two second search brought it, well one, up.
Perfect, thanks.
8.41am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline Was listening to some of the 1965 stereo mixes a couple of days ago and found them to be a mess. The first 4 songs have the vocals on one side, instruments on the other and just as your brain is getting used to it ‘Think For Yourself ‘ reverses it. Presumably it was down to the little amount of time George M had to get it ready for release. Not surprised he remixed it in 1987, shame he didn’t do a better job.
I disagree with myself of two years ago.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Beatlebug, Bongo, ewe2, Vera Chuck and Dave"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
2.52pm
28 March 2014
Offline meanmistermustard said
Was listening to some of the 1965 stereo mixes a couple of days ago and found them to be a mess. The first 4 songs have the vocals on one side, instruments on the other and just as your brain is getting used to it ‘Think For Yourself ‘ reverses it. Presumably it was down to the little amount of time George M had to get it ready for release. Not surprised he remixed it in 1987, shame he didn’t do a better job.I disagree with myself of two years ago.
I’ve been having 2nd thoughts too, especially after hearing some of the songs on Beatles 1 were they finally centered the vocals in the stereo tracks! 
Looks like you and I will be buying more re-re-re-re-reissues after all @meanmistermustard 
P.S. Love that Interview, that was a nice read and foresight with the mono/stereo reissues!
BEATLES Music gives me Eargasms! 
9.23pm
5 November 2011
Offline I prefer the mono version of Rubber Soul . It sounds fuller to me than the stereo versions.
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
5.45pm
25 February 2020
Offline DrBeatle said
I prefer the mono mixes of every Beatles album that has them (everything up to and including the White Album ).
this
The following people thank Vera Chuck and Dave for this post:
lovelyritametermaid7.37am
28 February 2020
Offline The irony of canyon width wide stereo mix being added to the Mono Box is delicious. Listening to the actual 65 stereo mix is not. I don’t hate the 87 mixes but I understand why George made them. So ya, Mono all the way for me.
What is happening? And tell me how you've been.
1 Guest(s)